Shen Lujun, Jiang Yiquan, Zhang Tao, Cao Fei, Ke Liangru, Li Chen, Nuerhashi Gulijiayina, Li Wang, Wu Peihong, Li Chaofeng, Zeng Qi, Fan Weijun
Department of Minimally invasive therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Cancer Inform. 2024 Oct 16;23:11769351241289719. doi: 10.1177/11769351241289719. eCollection 2024.
Patients with intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) require repeated disease monitoring, prognosis assessment and treatment planning. In 2018, a novel machine learning methodology "survival path" (SP) was developed to facilitate dynamic prognosis prediction and treatment planning. One year after, a deep learning approach called Dynamic Deephit was developed. The performance of the two state-of-art models in dynamic prognostication have not been compared.
We trained and tested the SP and Dynamic DeepHit models in a large cohort of 2511 HCC patients using time-series data. The time-series data were converted into data of time slices, with an interval of three months. The time-dependent c-index for OS at given prediction time ( = 1, 6, 12, 18 months) and evaluation time (∆ = 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 months) were compared.
The comparison between SP model and Dynamic DeepHit-HCC model showed the latter had significant better performance at the time of initial admission. The time-dependent c-index of Dynamic DeepHit-HCC model gradually decreased with the extension of time (from 0.756 to 0.639 in the training set; from 0.787 to 0.661 in internal testing set; from 0.725 to 0.668 in multicenter testing set); while the time-dependent c-index of SP model displayed an increased trend (from 0.665 to 0.748 in the training set; from 0.608 to 0.743 in internal testing set; from 0.643 to 0.720 in multicenter testing set). When the prediction time comes to 6 months or later since initial treatment, the survival path model outperformed the dynamic DeepHit model at late evaluation times (∆ > 12 months).
This research highlighted the unique strengths of both models. The SP model had advantage in long term prediction while the Dynamic DeepHit-HCC model had advantages in prediction at near time points. Fine selection of models is needed in dealing with different scenarios.
中晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者需要反复进行疾病监测、预后评估和治疗规划。2018年,一种名为“生存路径”(SP)的新型机器学习方法被开发出来,以促进动态预后预测和治疗规划。一年后,一种名为动态深度命中(Dynamic Deephit)的深度学习方法被开发出来。这两种最先进的模型在动态预后预测方面的性能尚未得到比较。
我们使用时间序列数据在一个包含2511例HCC患者的大型队列中训练和测试了SP和动态深度命中模型。时间序列数据被转换为时间切片数据,时间间隔为三个月。比较了在给定预测时间(=1、6、12、18个月)和评估时间(∆=3、6、9、12、18、24、36、48个月)时OS的时间依赖性c指数。
SP模型与动态深度命中-HCC模型的比较表明,后者在初次入院时具有显著更好的性能。动态深度命中-HCC模型的时间依赖性c指数随着时间的延长而逐渐下降(训练集中从0.756降至0.639;内部测试集中从0.787降至0.661;多中心测试集中从0.725降至0.668);而SP模型的时间依赖性c指数呈上升趋势(训练集中从0.665升至0.748;内部测试集中从0.608升至0.743;多中心测试集中从0.643升至0.720)。当预测时间从初始治疗起达到6个月或更晚时,生存路径模型在晚期评估时间(∆>12个月)的表现优于动态深度命中模型。
本研究突出了两种模型的独特优势。SP模型在长期预测方面具有优势,而动态深度命中-HCC模型在近期时间点的预测方面具有优势。在处理不同情况时需要精细选择模型。