An investigation of economic interactions between social reinforcement and heroin or cocaine in rats.

The primary goal of the present study was to determine the economic relationship between heroin and social reinforcement in rats: are they substitutes, independents, or complements? In Experiment 1, one group of rats was given a budget of responses that they could allocate between heroin and social reinforcement offered at various combinations of prices. A second group chose between two levers that each resulted in social reinforcement at varying prices when pressed. There was no relationship between the relative allocation of responses between heroin and social reinforcement and changes in their relative prices, indicating that these reinforcers are best viewed as independents. In contrast, when choosing between two sources of social reinforcement, rats increased the allocation of behavior to the cheaper option, confirming that the method used here was sensitive to detecting substitution effects. In Experiment 2, the same method was used to compare one group that chose between heroin and social reinforcement with a second group that chose between cocaine and social reinforcement. The finding that heroin and social reinforcement were independents was replicated. Additionally, there was some evidence that cocaine and social reinforcement were substitutes, at least when the first few minutes of the session were excluded. These results add to our knowledge of how drug and nondrug reinforcers interact in choice situations in rats and may model factors that influence drug use in humans.