• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠中社会强化与海洛因或可卡因之间的经济相互作用的研究。

An investigation of economic interactions between social reinforcement and heroin or cocaine in rats.

机构信息

Psychology Department, American University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Behav Pharmacol. 2024 Dec 1;35(8):442-452. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000798. Epub 2024 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000798
PMID:39421898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11527553/
Abstract

The primary goal of the present study was to determine the economic relationship between heroin and social reinforcement in rats: are they substitutes, independents, or complements? In Experiment 1, one group of rats was given a budget of responses that they could allocate between heroin and social reinforcement offered at various combinations of prices. A second group chose between two levers that each resulted in social reinforcement at varying prices when pressed. There was no relationship between the relative allocation of responses between heroin and social reinforcement and changes in their relative prices, indicating that these reinforcers are best viewed as independents. In contrast, when choosing between two sources of social reinforcement, rats increased the allocation of behavior to the cheaper option, confirming that the method used here was sensitive to detecting substitution effects. In Experiment 2, the same method was used to compare one group that chose between heroin and social reinforcement with a second group that chose between cocaine and social reinforcement. The finding that heroin and social reinforcement were independents was replicated. Additionally, there was some evidence that cocaine and social reinforcement were substitutes, at least when the first few minutes of the session were excluded. These results add to our knowledge of how drug and nondrug reinforcers interact in choice situations in rats and may model factors that influence drug use in humans.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是确定海洛因和社会强化物在大鼠中的经济关系

它们是替代品、独立物还是互补品?在实验 1 中,一组大鼠可以在不同价格的海洛因和社会强化物之间分配反应预算。第二组大鼠可以在两个杠杆之间进行选择,当按下时,每个杠杆都会以不同的价格提供社会强化物。海洛因和社会强化物之间反应分配的相对变化与它们相对价格的变化之间没有关系,这表明这些强化物最好被视为独立物。相比之下,当大鼠在两种社会强化物之间进行选择时,它们会增加对较便宜选项的行为分配,这证实了这里使用的方法对检测替代效应很敏感。在实验 2 中,使用相同的方法比较了一组大鼠在海洛因和社会强化物之间进行选择与另一组大鼠在可卡因和社会强化物之间进行选择的情况。结果复制了海洛因和社会强化物是独立物的发现。此外,有一些证据表明,可卡因和社会强化物至少在排除了会议的前几分钟后是替代品。这些结果增加了我们对大鼠在选择情境中药物和非药物强化物如何相互作用的了解,并且可能模拟了影响人类药物使用的因素。

相似文献

1
An investigation of economic interactions between social reinforcement and heroin or cocaine in rats.大鼠中社会强化与海洛因或可卡因之间的经济相互作用的研究。
Behav Pharmacol. 2024 Dec 1;35(8):442-452. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000798. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Cocaine and heroin interact differently with nondrug reinforcers in a choice situation.在选择情境中,可卡因和海洛因与非药物强化物的相互作用方式不同。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Apr;32(2):158-172. doi: 10.1037/pha0000674. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
3
Comparison of the reinforcing effects of cocaine and cocaine/heroin combinations under progressive ratio and choice schedules in rats.可卡因及可卡因/海洛因组合在大鼠渐进比率和选择实验模式下强化作用的比较
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005 Feb;30(2):286-95. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300560.
4
Qualitative and quantitative differences in the operant runway behavior of rats working for cocaine and heroin reinforcement.为获取可卡因和海洛因强化物而工作的大鼠在操作性跑道行为上的定性和定量差异。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1993 Jan;44(1):191-8. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(93)90298-8.
5
Effects of ibogaine on responding maintained by food, cocaine and heroin reinforcement in rats.伊博格碱对大鼠食物、可卡因和海洛因强化维持反应的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Feb;117(3):257-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02246099.
6
Bromocriptine self-administration and bromocriptine-reinstatement of cocaine-trained and heroin-trained lever pressing in rats.溴隐亭自我给药以及可卡因训练和海洛因训练大鼠按压杠杆行为的溴隐亭复吸实验
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;100(3):355-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02244606.
7
Drug specificity in drug versus food choice in male rats.雄性大鼠在药物与食物选择中的药物特异性
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Aug;22(4):364-72. doi: 10.1037/a0037019. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
8
Ambience and drug choice: cocaine- and heroin-taking as a function of environmental context in humans and rats.环境与药物选择:人类和大鼠中可卡因及海洛因使用与环境背景的关系
Biol Psychiatry. 2009 May 15;65(10):893-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.12.009. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
9
Choosing Under the Influence: A Drug-Specific Mechanism by Which the Setting Controls Drug Choices in Rats.在影响下做出选择:一种特定药物机制,环境借此控制大鼠的药物选择。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Jan;41(2):646-57. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.195. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
10
Extended heroin access increases heroin choices over a potent nondrug alternative.延长海洛因获取途径会增加人们对强力非毒品替代品的海洛因选择。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Jun;38(7):1209-20. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.17. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of Behavioral Economic Manipulations Affecting Drug versus Nondrug Choice in Rats.关于影响大鼠药物与非药物选择的行为经济学操纵的综述。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Apr 7;48(2):341-366. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00445-5. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Mechanistic and translational insights from preclinical cocaine choice procedures on the economic substitutability of cocaine and nondrug reinforcers.临床前可卡因选择程序对可卡因与非药物强化物经济替代性的机制及转化性见解。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025 Aug;175:106217. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106217. Epub 2025 May 21.
3
Demand for heroin in rats: effects of non-drug alternative substitutes and complements.

本文引用的文献

1
Social odor choice buffers drug craving.社交气味选择缓冲药物渴求。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Mar;49(4):731-739. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01778-y. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
2
Cocaine and heroin interact differently with nondrug reinforcers in a choice situation.在选择情境中,可卡因和海洛因与非药物强化物的相互作用方式不同。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Apr;32(2):158-172. doi: 10.1037/pha0000674. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
3
Wistar rats choose alcohol over social interaction in a discrete-choice model.Wistar 大鼠在离散选择模型中选择酒精而非社交互动。
大鼠对海洛因的需求:非药物替代物和补充物的影响。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 May 9. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02127-x.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Jun;48(7):1098-1107. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01526-8. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
4
Demand and cross-price elasticity of cocaine and social contact in a free-operant procedure of nonexclusive choice.非排他性选择自由操作程序中的可卡因需求和交叉价格弹性与社会接触。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2023 Jan;222:173511. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2022.173511. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
5
Sensitivity of a fentanyl-vs.-social interaction choice procedure to environmental and pharmacological manipulations.芬太尼与社交互动选择程序对环境和药理学操作的敏感性。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2022 Nov;221:173473. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2022.173473. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
6
Rats choose alcohol over social reward in an operant choice procedure.大鼠在操作性选择程序中选择酒精而不是社交奖励。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Mar;48(4):585-593. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01447-6. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
7
Effects of environmental manipulations on cocaine-vs-social choice in male and female rats.环境操作对雄性和雌性大鼠可卡因与社交选择的影响。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2022 Oct;220:173462. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2022.173462. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
8
Characterization of operant social interaction in rats: effects of access duration, effort, peer familiarity, housing conditions, and choice between social interaction vs. food or remifentanil.大鼠操作性社会互动的特征:访问持续时间、努力程度、同伴熟悉度、饲养条件以及在社会互动与食物或瑞芬太尼之间选择的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Jul;239(7):2093-2108. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06064-1. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
9
Effects of acute and repeated administration of the selective M PAM VU0152099 on cocaine versus food choice in male rats.急性和重复给予选择性 M PAM VU0152099 对雄性大鼠可卡因与食物选择的影响。
Addict Biol. 2022 Mar;27(2):e13145. doi: 10.1111/adb.13145.
10
The protective effect of operant social reward on cocaine self-administration, choice, and relapse is dependent on delay and effort for the social reward.操作性社会奖励对可卡因自我给药、选择和复吸的保护作用取决于社会奖励的延迟和努力。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Dec;46(13):2350-2357. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01148-6. Epub 2021 Aug 16.