Gallagher Joshua, Antunes Bárbara, Sutton James, Kuhn Isla, Kelly Michael P, Duschinsky Robbie, Barclay Stephen
Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Cambridge University Medical Library, Cambridge, UK.
Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;39(1):53-69. doi: 10.1177/02692163241286110. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
Policy and practice encourages patients to engage in self-care, with individual patient management and remote monitoring of disease. Much is known of the moderate stage of chronic disease, without a clear understanding of how self-care applies towards the end of life.
To review the current evidence on practices of self-care in life-limiting conditions and its impacts on healthcare utilisation, quality of life and associated costs.
We systematically searched 10 scientific databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts and Health Management Information Consortium) from inception to October 2023 with citation and hand searching. A narrative synthesis was undertaken, with quality and relevance assessed using Gough's Weight of Evidence framework. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by three researchers.
Findings from 33 studies revealed self-care as increasingly burdensome or unfeasible towards the end of life, with patients delaying use of professional care. Self-care became increasingly burdensome for patients, carers and professionals as illness progressed. Self-monitoring may exacerbate hospitalisations as patients delayed seeking professional help until crises arose. Findings regarding quality were inconclusive, with some evidence suggesting that self-care can decrease care costs.
This review has shown that research on self-care is an evolving area of study, with a current focus on acute care and hospitalisations. Future research should seek to provide a more complete account of the relation between self-care and non-acute care use, and quality, with further efforts to study self-care costs incurred through self-funding.
政策与实践鼓励患者进行自我护理,并对疾病进行个体化患者管理和远程监测。人们对慢性病的中期情况了解颇多,但对于自我护理在生命末期的应用却缺乏清晰认识。
回顾当前关于临终状态下自我护理实践及其对医疗利用、生活质量和相关成本影响的证据。
我们从数据库建库至2023年10月,通过引文检索和手工检索,系统地搜索了10个科学数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane Central、Cochrane系统评价数据库、Scopus、社会学文摘、社会工作文摘和卫生管理信息联盟)。采用叙述性综合分析方法,并使用高夫证据权重框架评估质量和相关性。由三名研究人员独立筛选标题和摘要。
33项研究的结果显示,在生命末期,自我护理对患者而言愈发繁重或不可行,患者会推迟寻求专业护理。随着疾病进展,自我护理对患者、护理人员和专业人员来说负担越来越重。由于患者直到病情危急才寻求专业帮助,自我监测可能会加剧住院情况。关于生活质量的研究结果尚无定论,一些证据表明自我护理可降低护理成本。
本综述表明,自我护理研究是一个不断发展的研究领域,目前主要关注急性护理和住院治疗。未来的研究应更全面地阐述自我护理与非急性护理利用及质量之间的关系,并进一步研究自费产生的自我护理成本。