• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康应用程序Oncokompas对晚期癌症患者自我管理姑息治疗需求的促进作用:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of the eHealth application Oncokompas, facilitating incurably ill cancer patients to self-manage their palliative care needs: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Schuit Anouk S, Holtmaat Karen, Lissenberg-Witte Birgit I, Eerenstein Simone E J, Zijlstra Josée M, Eeltink Corien, Becker-Commissaris Annemarie, van Zuylen Lia, van Linde Myra E, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt C Willemien, Sommeijer Dirkje W, Verbeek Nol, Bosscha Koop, Tewarie Rishi Nandoe, Sedee Robert-Jan, de Bree Remco, de Graeff Alexander, de Vos Filip, Cuijpers Pim, Verdonck-de Leeuw Irma M

机构信息

Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Apr 21;18:100390. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100390. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100390
PMID:
35496496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9046636/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients with incurable cancer have symptoms affecting their health-related quality of life. The eHealth application 'Oncokompas' supports patients to take an active role in managing their palliative care needs, to reduce symptoms and improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of Oncokompas compared to care as usual among incurably ill cancer patients with a life expectancy of more than three months.

METHODS

Patients were recruited in six hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (direct access to Oncokompas) or the control group (access to Oncokompas after three months). The primary outcome measure was patient activation (i.e., patients' knowledge, skills and confidence for self-management). Secondary outcomes were general self-efficacy and HRQOL. Measures were assessed at baseline, two weeks after randomization, and three months after the baseline measurement. Linear mixed models were used to compare longitudinal changes between both groups from baseline to the three-month follow-up.

FINDINGS

In total, 219 patients were eligible of which 138 patients completed the baseline questionnaire (response rate 63%), and were randomized to the intervention (69) or control group (69). There were no significant differences between the intervention and control group over time in patient activation (estimated difference in change T0-T2; 1·8 (90% CI: -1·0 to 4·7)), neither in general self-efficacy and HRQOL. Of the patients in the intervention group who activated their account, 74% used Oncokompas as intended. The course of patient activation, general self-efficacy, and HRQOL was not significantly different between patients who used Oncokompas as intended versus those who did not.

INTERPRETATION

Among incurably ill cancer patients with a life expectancy of more than three months and recruited in the hospital setting, Oncokompas did not significantly improve patient activation, self-efficacy, or HRQOL.

FUNDING

ZonMw, Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (844001105).

摘要

背景

许多无法治愈的癌症患者存在影响其健康相关生活质量的症状。电子健康应用程序“Oncokompas”帮助患者在管理其姑息治疗需求方面发挥积极作用,以减轻症状并改善健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。本随机对照试验旨在确定与常规护理相比,Oncokompas对预期寿命超过三个月的无法治愈的癌症患者的疗效。

方法

在荷兰的六家医院招募患者。符合条件的患者被随机分配到干预组(直接使用Oncokompas)或对照组(三个月后使用Oncokompas)。主要结局指标是患者激活度(即患者自我管理的知识、技能和信心)。次要结局是一般自我效能感和健康相关生活质量。在基线、随机分组后两周以及基线测量后三个月进行测量。使用线性混合模型比较两组从基线到三个月随访的纵向变化。

结果

共有219名患者符合条件,其中138名患者完成了基线问卷(应答率63%),并被随机分配到干预组(69名)或对照组(69名)。随着时间的推移,干预组和对照组在患者激活度方面没有显著差异(T0 - T2变化的估计差异;1·8(90%CI:-1·0至4·7)),在一般自我效能感和健康相关生活质量方面也没有显著差异。在干预组中激活账户的患者中,74%按预期使用了Oncokompas。按预期使用Oncokompas的患者与未按预期使用的患者在患者激活度、一般自我效能感和健康相关生活质量的变化过程上没有显著差异。

解读

在医院环境中招募的预期寿命超过三个月的无法治愈的癌症患者中,Oncokompas并未显著改善患者激活度、自我效能感或健康相关生活质量。

资助

荷兰卫生研究与发展组织ZonMw(844001105)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3cb/9046636/cac917a72b2d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3cb/9046636/cac917a72b2d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3cb/9046636/cac917a72b2d/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of the eHealth application Oncokompas, facilitating incurably ill cancer patients to self-manage their palliative care needs: A randomized controlled trial.电子健康应用程序Oncokompas对晚期癌症患者自我管理姑息治疗需求的促进作用:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Apr 21;18:100390. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100390. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Reach and efficacy of the eHealth application Oncokompas, facilitating partners of incurably ill cancer patients to self-manage their caregiver needs: a randomized controlled trial.电子健康应用程序 Oncokompas 的可达性和效果,促进绝症癌症患者的伴侣自我管理其照顾者需求:一项随机对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec;30(12):10191-10201. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07441-4. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
3
Efficacy and cost-utility of the eHealth application 'Oncokompas', supporting patients with incurable cancer in finding optimal palliative care, tailored to their quality of life and personal preferences: a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.电子健康应用程序“Oncokompas”在支持绝症患者寻找最佳姑息治疗方面的疗效和成本效益,以适应他们的生活质量和个人偏好:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 23;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0468-8.
4
Cost-Utility of the eHealth Application 'Oncokompas', Supporting Incurably Ill Cancer Patients to Self-Manage Their Cancer-Related Symptoms: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.电子健康应用程序“Oncokompas”在支持绝症癌症患者自我管理癌症相关症状方面的成本效用:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 27;29(9):6186-6202. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090486.
5
Efficacy and cost-utility of the eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas', helping partners of patients with incurable cancer to identify their unmet supportive care needs and to take actions to meet their needs: a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.电子健康自我管理应用程序“Oncokompas”在帮助绝症患者的伴侣识别其未满足的支持性护理需求并采取行动满足这些需求方面的疗效和成本效用:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jan 31;21(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4037-5.
6
Role of eHealth application Oncokompas in supporting self-management of symptoms and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors: a randomised, controlled trial.电子健康应用 Oncokompas 在支持癌症幸存者自我管理症状和健康相关生活质量中的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):80-94. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30675-8. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
7
The eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas' that supports cancer survivors to improve health-related quality of life and reduce symptoms: which groups benefit most?电子健康自我管理应用程序“Oncokompas”可帮助癌症幸存者改善健康相关生活质量并减轻症状:哪些群体受益最大?
Acta Oncol. 2021 Apr;60(4):403-411. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1851764. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
8
Efficacy, cost-utility and reach of an eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas' that helps cancer survivors to obtain optimal supportive care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一款帮助癌症幸存者获得最佳支持性护理的电子健康自我管理应用程序“Oncokompas”的疗效、成本效益及覆盖范围:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 May 22;18(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1952-1.
9
Effect of general practitioner-led versus surgeon-led colon cancer survivorship care, with or without eHealth support, on quality of life (I CARE): an interim analysis of 1-year results of a randomised, controlled trial.全科医生主导与外科医生主导的结肠癌生存护理,联合或不联合电子健康支持,对生活质量的影响(I CARE):一项随机对照试验 1 年结果的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1175-1187. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00273-4. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
Symptom monitoring in cancer and fully automated advice on supportive care: Patients' perspectives on self-management strategies and the eHealth self-management application Oncokompas.癌症症状监测和支持性护理的全自动化建议:患者对自我管理策略和电子健康自我管理应用 Oncokompas 的看法。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Nov;30(6):e13497. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13497. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Patient-Centered Digital Empowerment Programs in Hematological Cancer Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.以患者为中心的数字赋能项目在血液系统癌症护理中的有效性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2025 Aug;22(4):e70064. doi: 10.1111/wvn.70064.
2
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Mobile App for Breast Cancer Self-Management on Self-Efficacy: Nonrandomized Intervention Trial.评估一款乳腺癌自我管理移动应用对自我效能的有效性:非随机干预试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Mar 26;13:e63989. doi: 10.2196/63989.
3
A regional program evaluation of the Stanford Chronic Pain Self-Management Program in Eastern Ontario, Canada.

本文引用的文献

1
Reasons for not reaching or using web-based self-management applications, and the use and evaluation of Oncokompas among cancer survivors, in the context of a randomised controlled trial.在一项随机对照试验的背景下,癌症幸存者未接触或使用基于网络的自我管理应用程序的原因,以及Oncokompas在他们中的使用和评估情况。
Internet Interv. 2021 Jul 15;25:100429. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100429. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Symptom monitoring in cancer and fully automated advice on supportive care: Patients' perspectives on self-management strategies and the eHealth self-management application Oncokompas.癌症症状监测和支持性护理的全自动化建议:患者对自我管理策略和电子健康自我管理应用 Oncokompas 的看法。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Nov;30(6):e13497. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13497. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
对加拿大安大略省东部斯坦福慢性疼痛自我管理项目的区域项目评估。
Can J Pain. 2025 Jan 24;9(1):2440338. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2024.2440338. eCollection 2025.
4
Electronic Health in the Palliative Care Pathway for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈癌患者姑息治疗途径中的电子健康
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan 1;151(1):19-27. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.3691.
5
Self-care towards the end of life: A systematic review and narrative synthesis on access, quality and cost.临终阶段的自我护理:关于可及性、质量和成本的系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;39(1):53-69. doi: 10.1177/02692163241286110. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
6
Effect of applying digital health in palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.应用数字健康在晚期癌症患者姑息治疗中的效果:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Sep 17;32(10):664. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08866-9.
7
Effect of Digital Health Coaching on Self-Efficacy and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Individuals with Acute Myeloid and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.数字健康指导对急性髓系白血病和慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者自我效能及患者报告结局的影响:一项随机对照试验试点研究
Acta Haematol. 2025;148(2):233-243. doi: 10.1159/000539756. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
8
Interactive digital tools to support empowerment of people with cancer: a systematic literature review.互动数字工具支持癌症患者赋权:系统文献回顾。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 May 31;32(6):396. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08545-9.
9
Evaluating the Potential of Machine Learning and Wearable Devices in End-of-Life Care in Predicting 7-Day Death Events Among Patients With Terminal Cancer: Cohort Study.评估机器学习和可穿戴设备在预测终末期癌症患者 7 天内死亡事件中的应用潜力:队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 18;25:e47366. doi: 10.2196/47366.
10
Cost-Utility of the eHealth Application 'Oncokompas', Supporting Incurably Ill Cancer Patients to Self-Manage Their Cancer-Related Symptoms: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.电子健康应用程序“Oncokompas”在支持绝症癌症患者自我管理癌症相关症状方面的成本效用:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 27;29(9):6186-6202. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090486.
Effect of general practitioner-led versus surgeon-led colon cancer survivorship care, with or without eHealth support, on quality of life (I CARE): an interim analysis of 1-year results of a randomised, controlled trial.全科医生主导与外科医生主导的结肠癌生存护理,联合或不联合电子健康支持,对生活质量的影响(I CARE):一项随机对照试验 1 年结果的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1175-1187. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00273-4. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Digital health interventions in palliative care: a systematic meta-review.姑息治疗中的数字健康干预措施:一项系统的元综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Apr 6;4(1):64. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00430-7.
5
Symptom Burden and Palliative Care Needs of Patients with Incurable Cancer at Diagnosis and During the Disease Course.初诊时不可治愈癌症患者的症状负担和姑息治疗需求,以及在疾病过程中的需求。
Oncologist. 2021 Jun;26(6):e1058-e1065. doi: 10.1002/onco.13751. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
6
Patients' experiences of eHealth in palliative care: an integrative review.患者在姑息治疗中对电子健康的体验:综合评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 14;19(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00667-1.
7
Cost-utility of an eHealth application 'Oncokompas' that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial.电子健康应用程序“Oncokompas”支持癌症幸存者自我管理的成本效用:一项随机对照试验的结果。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Feb;15(1):77-86. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00912-9. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
8
Management of Cancer and Health After the Clinic Visit: A Call to Action for Self-Management in Cancer Care.就诊后癌症与健康管理:癌症护理中自我管理的行动呼吁。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 May 4;113(5):523-531. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa083.
9
How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? Review of anchors and methods.健康相关生活质量量表中的最小临床重要差异是如何确定的?对锚定物和方法的综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 12;18(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01344-w.
10
Palliative Care for Patients With Cancer in the COVID-19 Era.新冠疫情时代癌症患者的姑息治疗
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Oct 1;6(10):1527-1528. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1938.