Kerr Bradley, Garimella Amrutha, Pillarisetti Lekha, Charlly Neha, Sullivan Katie, Moreno Megan A
Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Dauten Family Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Adolesc Health. 2025 Jan;76(1):18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.09.003. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
Studies show mixed associations between adolescent social media use and anxiety. This systematic review evaluated research on social media and anxiety among adolescents for direction of associations, social media measures, demographic stratification, anxiety measures, and study quality.
We searched for articles published in English before 2021 that tested associations between adolescent social media use and anxiety. Each study underwent screening and data extraction by two reviewers. Measures included direction of associations (positive, negative, null, mixed), social media measures, demographic group stratification, anxiety measures, and study quality (Strengthening of Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology).
A total of 32 studies were included. Over half reported positive associations between social media use and anxiety (56.3%). Problematic use was the most common social media measure type (31.4%). Positive associations with anxiety were predominantly observed for measures of problematic use (75.0%) and screen time (72.7%). Among other social media measures, 40.9% showed positive associations. A total of 18 anxiety measures were used. Four studies (12.5%) stratified findings by gender identity. The mean Strengthening of Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology score was 34.1 (standard deviation = 4.3) out of 46.
Future work should explore accurate social media use measures that are not based on problematic use.
研究表明青少年使用社交媒体与焦虑之间的关联不一。本系统评价评估了关于青少年社交媒体使用与焦虑的研究,涉及关联方向、社交媒体测量方法、人口分层、焦虑测量方法及研究质量。
我们检索了2021年之前发表的英文文章,这些文章检验了青少年社交媒体使用与焦虑之间的关联。每项研究由两名评审员进行筛选和数据提取。测量内容包括关联方向(正相关、负相关、无关联、混合关联)、社交媒体测量方法、人口分组分层、焦虑测量方法以及研究质量(《加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范》)。
共纳入32项研究。超过一半的研究报告社交媒体使用与焦虑之间存在正相关(56.3%)。问题使用是最常见的社交媒体测量类型(31.4%)。在问题使用(75.0%)和屏幕使用时间(72.7%)的测量中,主要观察到与焦虑的正相关。在其他社交媒体测量中,40.9%显示出正相关。总共使用了18种焦虑测量方法。四项研究(12.5%)按性别认同对研究结果进行了分层。《加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范》的平均得分在46分中为34.1分(标准差 = 4.3)。
未来的研究应探索不基于问题使用的准确社交媒体使用测量方法。