Assis José Guilherme, Almendra Ricardo, Matas Andreia, Veiga Andreia, Pires Romeu, Silva Mário Rui
Department of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, PRT.
Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, PRT.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):e71851. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71851. eCollection 2024 Oct.
It is essential to understand the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on stroke care, contemplating the potential health and economic consequences of missed diagnoses or treatments. This study examined the pandemic's effects on stroke epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment in a hospital setting, comparing data from March 2020 to February 2021 with the homologous period the previous year. A secondary analysis focused on the state of emergency periods (March 19 to May 2 and November 6 to February 28). The sample included 730 stroke admissions, with 343 during the pandemic. There was a 24.75% reduction in the average daily occupancy rate (p<0.001) and a slight decrease in average daily admissions, especially in June from 132% to 74% (p=0.01). There was a moderate negative correlation between the number of COVID-19 cases and occupancy rates in January (r{s}=-0.422, p=0.01) and February (r{s}=-0.532, p=0.01). Admissions for ischemic stroke decreased by 7.2% (p=0.026), particularly mild events, with a 6.8% decrease in lacunar syndromes (p=0.048). Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) increased by 5.4% (p=0.046), while intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) decreased by 2.8% (p=0.048), especially in severe stroke cases (-21.4%, p=0.001). The pandemic period documented more MT procedures than IVT. Hemorrhagic stroke admissions increased by 6.7% (p=0.01). The analysis suggests a reduction in mild ischemic stroke admissions and fewer patients undergoing IVT for severe strokes during the pandemic. Broader-scale studies are necessary to confirm these findings. Considering the documented decline in diagnosis and treatment, minimizing the impact on stroke care during potential sanitary crises is paramount.
了解新冠疫情对中风护理的影响至关重要,要考虑漏诊或漏治可能带来的健康和经济后果。本研究在医院环境中考察了疫情对中风流行病学、临床特征及治疗的影响,将2020年3月至2021年2月的数据与上一年同期数据进行了比较。二次分析聚焦于紧急状态时期(3月19日至5月2日以及11月6日至2月28日)。样本包括730例中风入院病例,其中疫情期间有343例。平均每日住院率下降了24.75%(p<0.001),平均每日入院人数略有减少,尤其是6月从132%降至74%(p=0.01)。1月(rs=-0.422,p=0.01)和2月(rs=-0.532,p=0.01)新冠病例数与住院率之间存在中度负相关。缺血性中风入院人数减少了7.2%(p=0.026),尤其是轻度病例,腔隙综合征减少了6.8%(p=0.048)。机械取栓术(MT)增加了5.4%(p=0.046),而静脉溶栓(IVT)减少了2.8%(p=0.048),尤其是在重症中风病例中减少了21.4%(p=0.001)。疫情期间记录的MT手术比IVT更多。出血性中风入院人数增加了6.7%(p=0.01)。分析表明,疫情期间轻度缺血性中风入院人数减少,重症中风接受IVT治疗的患者也减少。需要开展更广泛的研究来证实这些发现。鉴于已记录到的诊断和治疗下降情况,在潜在卫生危机期间尽量减少对中风护理的影响至关重要。