Sun Shufang, Guy Arryn A, Murphy Matthew J, Zelaya David G, Fernandez Yohansa, Operario Don
Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health.
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School.
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2024 Jul;33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100804. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
Young adult sexual minority men are at heightened risk for psychological distress (i.e., depression and anxiety). Mounting evidence suggests the adverse consequences of distal stigma, and existing frameworks (the Minority Stress Theory and Psychological Mediation Framework) posit that distal minority stress may impact psychological distress through minority stress-specific processes, such as internalized homonegativity, as well as general psychological vulnerability factors, such as emotion dysregulation. There is a lack of research examining this process integrating both frameworks and understanding potential resilience factors such as mindfulness and self-compassion and where they may assert impact. Using structural equation modeling, the current study investigated the relationship between distal minority stress, measured by heterosexist discrimination, and psychological distress (i.e., depression and anxiety) through a serial indirect effect via internalized homonegativity and emotion dysregulation, while including internalized homonegativity and emotion dysregulation for their unique indirect effects separately, among young adult sexual minority men ( = 307). Further, the study explored mindfulness and self-compassion as potential moderators in subsequent models. Results indicate that two significant paths explain the association between heterosexist discrimination and psychological distress, including through internalized homonegativity and emotion dysregulation as a serial indirect path, as well as through internalized homonegativity alone. Both mindfulness and self-compassion emerged as protective factors in the "upstream" part of the model, particularly in the effect of heterosexist discrimination on internalized homonegativity. Contrary to expectation, both mindfulness and self-compassion had a strengthening impact on the positive association between internalized homonegativity and emotion dysregulation. Findings support the conceptualization of emotion dysregulation as a "downstream" effect of minority stress, as well as adapting and utilizing mindfulness and self-compassion to alleviate the impact of distal minority stress. Additional longitudinal research, particularly rigorously designed clinical trials, is needed to further evaluate such intervention programs.
年轻的成年性少数群体男性面临心理困扰(即抑郁和焦虑)的风险更高。越来越多的证据表明了远端污名的不良后果,现有的框架(少数群体压力理论和心理中介框架)假定远端少数群体压力可能通过特定于少数群体压力的过程(如内化的同性恋消极态度)以及一般心理易损因素(如情绪失调)来影响心理困扰。缺乏研究将这两个框架结合起来考察这一过程,并理解诸如正念和自我同情等潜在的复原力因素以及它们可能发挥影响的方面。本研究采用结构方程模型,调查了以异性恋歧视衡量的远端少数群体压力与心理困扰(即抑郁和焦虑)之间的关系,通过内化的同性恋消极态度和情绪失调的系列间接效应,同时分别纳入内化的同性恋消极态度和情绪失调以考察其独特的间接效应,研究对象为年轻的成年性少数群体男性(n = 307)。此外,该研究在后续模型中探讨了正念和自我同情作为潜在调节变量的情况。结果表明,两条显著路径解释了异性恋歧视与心理困扰之间的关联,包括通过内化的同性恋消极态度和情绪失调作为系列间接路径,以及仅通过内化的同性恋消极态度。正念和自我同情在模型的“上游”部分均表现为保护因素,特别是在异性恋歧视对内化的同性恋消极态度的影响方面。与预期相反,正念和自我同情对内化的同性恋消极态度与情绪失调之间的正相关关系均有增强作用。研究结果支持将情绪失调概念化为少数群体压力的“下游”效应,以及采用和利用正念与自我同情来减轻远端少数群体压力的影响。需要更多的纵向研究,特别是设计严谨的临床试验,来进一步评估此类干预项目。