Acosta-Enriquez Benicio Gonzalo, Ramos Farroñan Emma Verónica, Villena Zapata Luigi Italo, Mogollon Garcia Francisco Segundo, Rabanal-León Helen Catalina, Angaspilco Jahaira Eulalia Morales, Bocanegra Jesús Catherine Saldaña
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru.
Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Peru.
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 29;10(19):e38315. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38315. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
This systematic review examined, through the UTAUT2 model, the factors influencing the acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in university contexts. A total of 50 scientific texts published between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed and selected after a rigorous search of specialized databases. These findings confirm the versatility of UTAUT2 in elucidating technological adoption processes in higher education. Performance expectancy and hedonic motivation emerged as significant predictors of intentions and effective use among students, faculty, and administrative staff. Among students, perceived ease of use and social influence were also relevant. The analysis revealed differences in adoption patterns between STEM and non-STEM disciplines and between public and private institutions. Despite widespread positive perceptions of AI's potential, barriers such as distrust and lack of knowledge persist. The research also identified moderating and mediating factors, such as prior technology experience and technological self-efficacy. These results have important implications for the implementation of AI in higher education, suggesting the need for differentiated approaches according to the characteristics of each group and institutional context. It is recommended to develop strategies that address the identified barriers and leverage facilitators, with an emphasis on training, ethical design, and contextual adaptation of AI applications. Future research should explore the longitudinal evolution of these factors and examine AI adoption in non-STEM disciplines in greater depth.
本系统综述通过UTAUT2模型,研究了影响大学环境中人工智能(AI)应用接受度的因素。在对专业数据库进行严格检索后,分析并筛选了2018年至2023年间发表的50篇科学文献。这些研究结果证实了UTAUT2在阐释高等教育技术采用过程方面的通用性。绩效期望和享乐动机成为学生、教师和行政人员意图和有效使用的重要预测因素。在学生中,感知易用性和社会影响也具有相关性。分析揭示了STEM学科与非STEM学科之间以及公立和私立机构之间采用模式的差异。尽管对人工智能的潜力普遍持积极看法,但不信任和知识匮乏等障碍仍然存在。该研究还确定了调节和中介因素,如先前的技术经验和技术自我效能感。这些结果对高等教育中人工智能的实施具有重要意义,表明需要根据每个群体的特点和机构背景采取差异化方法。建议制定应对已识别障碍并利用促进因素的策略,重点是人工智能应用的培训、道德设计和情境适应。未来的研究应探索这些因素的纵向演变,并更深入地研究非STEM学科中的人工智能采用情况。