• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对在乌克兰需要进行髋关节翻修的原因进行系统分类、解决这些原因的方法以及治疗结果。

Systematisation of the causes that required revision hip replacement, methods of their solution, treatment results in Ukraine.

机构信息

Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics of Adults, Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine.

Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02631-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02631-9
PMID:39434026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11492652/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to organise data on complications following total hip replacement (THA) over a span of 10 years, specifically focussing on cases that necessitated revision endoprosthetic surgeries. The objective is to create a recommendation for an All-Ukrainian registry of initial and repeated hip arthroplasty (HA) and standardise the terminology used to define "revision of total hip replacement surgery".

METHODS

The retrospective analysis examined 236 instances of revision hip arthroplasty (rTHA) performed at the Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics Centre between January 2005 and December 2021. The primary factors for revision were identified through an analysis of the patient's medical records, laboratory results, visual inspection, and the state of the previously implanted prosthesis. Demographic information, primary and revision HA dates, diagnoses, and causes of complications were recorded. The statistical analysis was conducted using the Statistica package (StatSoft), version 12.6 (2015), with a significance level of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Out of the 364 patients who were diagnosed with complications, 236 of them (55.17%) needed a procedure called 1rTHA. Among these cases, 152 (41.76%) were specifically diagnosed with aseptic component instability. Significant factors for mechanical loosening were a high body mass index (BMI ≥ 30) and older age, with respective t-values of 2.08 (p = 0.004) and 2.59 (p = 0.045). Osteoporosis significantly contributed to aseptic loosening and fractures around the implant. The occurrence of infectious complications was frequently linked to chronic infectious diseases (t = 3.37, p = 0.001). The overall percentage of need for 2rTHA was 27.22% (43 cases), with one case of infectious lesion following the revision.

CONCLUSIONS

The study emphasises the urgent requirement for standardised terminology and a comprehensive registry for hip arthroplasty procedures. Primary results indicate that cement-free fixation is more effective than cement-based fixation for revision in patients with aseptic instability and that two-stage arthroplasty is effective for treating infectious inflammation. Furthermore, the most effective treatment for femoral fractures with periprosthetic involvement was determined to be open repositioning and osteosynthesis with metal retainers. The aforementioned observations emphasise the need to create a comprehensive registry across Ukraine to support patient care, enable evidence-based practices, and enhance the overall effectiveness of hip arthroplasty operations.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在对 10 年间全髋关节置换术(THA)后并发症的数据进行整理,重点关注需要翻修的病例。目的是为乌克兰初次和翻修髋关节置换术(HA)的注册制定建议,并规范“全髋关节翻修术”定义的术语。

方法

本回顾性分析研究了 2005 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月在创伤与矫形中心研究所进行的 236 例翻修髋关节置换术(rTHA)病例。通过对患者病历、实验室结果、肉眼观察和先前植入假体的状态进行分析,确定翻修的主要因素。记录了人口统计学信息、初次和翻修 HA 的日期、诊断和并发症的原因。统计分析使用 Statistica 软件包(StatSoft),版本 12.6(2015 年),显著性水平为 p<0.05。

结果

在 364 名被诊断为并发症的患者中,有 236 名(55.17%)需要进行 1rTHA 手术。在这些病例中,有 152 例(41.76%)被明确诊断为无菌性部件不稳定。机械松动的显著因素是高体重指数(BMI≥30)和年龄较大,相应的 t 值分别为 2.08(p=0.004)和 2.59(p=0.045)。骨质疏松症显著导致无菌性松动和植入物周围骨折。感染性并发症的发生常与慢性传染病有关(t=3.37,p=0.001)。需要 2rTHA 的总体百分比为 27.22%(43 例),其中一例为翻修后感染性病变。

结论

本研究强调了对髋关节置换术标准化术语和综合登记的迫切需求。初步结果表明,在无菌性不稳定的患者中,无水泥固定比水泥基固定更有效,两阶段关节置换术对治疗感染性炎症有效。此外,对于伴有假体周围受累的股骨骨折,最有效的治疗方法是切开复位和金属固定器骨内固定。上述观察结果强调了在乌克兰建立一个全面的登记处的必要性,以支持患者护理,实施基于证据的实践,并提高髋关节置换术的整体效果。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d51/11492652/d230ef477434/12893_2024_2631_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d51/11492652/715c91c48acc/12893_2024_2631_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d51/11492652/d230ef477434/12893_2024_2631_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d51/11492652/715c91c48acc/12893_2024_2631_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d51/11492652/d230ef477434/12893_2024_2631_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematisation of the causes that required revision hip replacement, methods of their solution, treatment results in Ukraine.对在乌克兰需要进行髋关节翻修的原因进行系统分类、解决这些原因的方法以及治疗结果。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02631-9.
2
In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.在翻修全髋关节置换术中,双动结构或大直径股骨头假体的再次翻修脱位和无菌性松动风险是否更高?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jun 1;480(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002085. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
3
Survivorship and Risk Factors for Re-Revision after Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Aged ≤55 Years.≤55 岁患者无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术后再次翻修的生存情况和危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8):1626-1630. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.057. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
4
[Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].[髋关节假体固定类型及患者年龄对全髋关节置换中期翻修率的影响]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(1):46-53.
5
Contemporary Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients ≤50 Years of Age: Results of >500 Cases.≤50 岁患者的当代无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术:超过 500 例的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Jun 19;106(12):1108-1116. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01467. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
6
A comparison of cemented femoral fixation via anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 60,739 total hip arthroplasties.通过前侧与后侧入路行骨水泥型股骨固定的全髋关节置换术的比较:60739 例全髋关节置换术的分析。
Hip Int. 2024 Jul;34(4):442-451. doi: 10.1177/11207000241239914. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
7
Cemented Versus Cementless Femoral Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Osteoarthritis.骨水泥固定与非骨水泥固定在骨关节炎全髋关节置换术后的应用比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jun;39(6):1545-1549. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.12.024. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
8
Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Through an Anterior Approach: Survivorship and Risk Factors for Re-Revision.经前路入路的无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术:再翻修的生存率及危险因素
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9):2341-2345. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.025. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
9
What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.初次全髋关节置换术治疗骨关节炎的翻修结果如何?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1952-1970. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002339. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
10
Up to 10-year follow-up of the Symax stem in THA: a Danish single-centre study.Symax股骨柄在全髋关节置换术中长达10年的随访:一项丹麦单中心研究。
Hip Int. 2018 Jul;28(4):375-381. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000578. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Revision Hip Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Center Study of 423 Hips at a High-Volume Center Between 2008 and 2021.2008 年至 2021 年高容量中心 423 髋假体关节感染翻修髋关节手术的趋势:单中心研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1151-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.061. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
Impact of Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) collaboration on demographics, methods and revision rates in knee arthroplasty: a register-based study from NARA 2000-2017.北欧关节置换注册协会(NARA)合作对膝关节置换手术的人口统计学、方法和翻修率的影响:来自 NARA 2000-2017 年的基于注册的研究。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Nov 28;93:866-873. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.5256.
3
Primary total hip arthroplasty failure: aseptic loosening remains the most common cause of revision.
初次全髋关节置换术失败:无菌性松动仍是翻修的最常见原因。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Oct 15;14(10):7080-7089. eCollection 2022.
4
How long do revised and multiply revised hip replacements last? A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry.翻修及多次翻修的髋关节置换术能维持多久?一项基于国家关节注册中心的回顾性观察研究。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2022 Jun 23;4(7):e468-e479. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(22)00097-2. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.初次全髋关节置换术治疗骨关节炎的翻修结果如何?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1952-1970. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002339. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
6
Causes of revision after total hip arthroplasty in an orthopedics and traumatology regional center.某骨科与创伤区域中心全髋关节置换术后翻修的原因
Med Pharm Rep. 2022 Apr;95(2):179-184. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2136. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
7
Aseptic Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Modular Femoral Stem and a Modified Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy-Treatment Assessment With the Forgotten Joint Score-12.采用单一模块化股骨柄和改良扩大转子截骨术进行全髋关节置换无菌翻修术——使用遗忘关节评分-12进行治疗评估
Arthroplast Today. 2022 May 18;15:159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.024. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Identification of Risk Factors in the Development of Heterotopic Ossification After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.原发性全髋关节置换术后异位骨化发展的危险因素识别。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Aug 18;107(9):e3944-e3952. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac249.
9
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Solid Organ Transplant Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study for Aseptic and Infected Revisions.实体器官移植患者的翻修全髋关节置换术:无菌性和感染性翻修的倾向评分匹配队列研究
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Jan 20;14:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.10.007. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Instability Is the Most Common Indication for Revision Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Trends From 2012 to 2018.在美国,不稳定是髋关节置换翻修术最常见的指征:2012年至2018年的全国趋势。
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Aug 31;11:88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.001. eCollection 2021 Oct.