Abu-Basha Ehab A, Ismail Zuhair Bani, Widemann Lea, Daradkeh Yasmin, Al-Omari Omar, Fahmawi Alaa, Lakaideh Mais, Sha'fout Belal, Mellhem Haia, Al-Bayari Leen, Talafha Hani, Hijazeen Zaidoun, Al-Omari Bilal, DeMarco Jean, Karesh William B
Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
EcoHealth Alliance, 520 Eighth Avenue, Ste. 1200, New York, NY 10018, USA.
One Health. 2024 Oct 5;19:100906. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100906. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Despite its endemic status in the Middle East, key knowledge gaps persist regarding the prevalence, transmission rate, and geographical distribution of both human and livestock brucellosis in Jordan. This study aimed to investigate the seroprevalence of human and livestock brucellosis as well as the incidence of brucellosis in humans in Jordan. A total of 500 human participants (202 exposed and 296 unexposed to livestock) were enrolled in the study. Sampling was conducted at baseline and 1.5 years later. Additionally, a total of 700 livestock were sampled, comprising 20 animals per taxa (camels, cattle, sheep, goats) per site, at both baseline ( = 350) and the 1.5-year follow-up (N = 350). Human participants were longitudinally followed, whereas livestock sampling was conducted opportunistically. Blood samples obtained from both humans and livestock at baseline and follow-up were tested for spp. serum antibodies using the Rose Bengal test (RBT) and complement fixation test (CFT). The overall seroprevalence of brucellosis in humans at baseline was 3.4 % (95 % CI: 2.0-5.4). Positive test results in humans were detected from all five sites with no significant regional variation observed. Seroprevalence was higher in individuals regularly exposed to livestock (6.1 %; 95 % CI: 3.5-9.9) compared to those not regularly exposed (0.80 %; 95 % CI: 0.10-2.9). Incidence of human brucellosis was 924 seropositives per 100,000 person-years, with all incident seropositives occurring in the livestock-exposed cohort. In livestock, the overall seroprevalence of brucellosis was 5.4 % (95 % CI: 3.5-8.3) at baseline compared to 2.6 % (95 % CI: 1.4-4.8) at follow-up. Seropositive livestock were detected at all sites apart from Al-Zarqa, and in all species apart from camels. In conclusion: Brucellosis burden was higher among humans regularly exposed to livestock, re-emphasizing the need for disease control in livestock populations to prevent primary infection in humans.
尽管布鲁氏菌病在中东地区呈地方病状态,但约旦人畜布鲁氏菌病的流行率、传播率和地理分布方面仍存在关键知识空白。本研究旨在调查约旦人畜布鲁氏菌病的血清阳性率以及人类布鲁氏菌病的发病率。共有500名人类参与者(202名接触家畜者和296名未接触家畜者)纳入本研究。在基线期和1.5年后进行采样。此外,共对700头家畜进行采样,每个地点每个分类群(骆驼、牛、绵羊、山羊)20只动物,在基线期(n = 350)和1.5年随访期(N = 350)均进行采样。对人类参与者进行纵向随访,而家畜采样则是机会性进行。在基线期和随访期从人和家畜采集的血样使用玫瑰红试验(RBT)和补体结合试验(CFT)检测布鲁氏菌属血清抗体。基线期人类布鲁氏菌病的总体血清阳性率为3.4%(95%CI:2.0 - 5.4)。在所有五个地点均检测到人类阳性检测结果,未观察到显著的区域差异。与未经常接触家畜者(0.80%;95%CI:0.10 - 2.9)相比,经常接触家畜的个体血清阳性率更高(6.1%;95%CI:3.5 - 9.9)。人类布鲁氏菌病发病率为每10万人年924例血清阳性,所有新发血清阳性病例均出现在接触家畜的队列中。在家畜中,基线期布鲁氏菌病的总体血清阳性率为5.4%(95%CI:3.5 - 8.3),随访期为2.6%(95%CI:1.4 - 4.8)。除扎尔卡外,所有地点均检测到血清阳性家畜,除骆驼外所有物种均有血清阳性。总之:经常接触家畜的人群中布鲁氏菌病负担更高,再次强调需要控制家畜群体中的疾病以预防人类的原发性感染。