Suppr超能文献

用于评估首发精神性障碍个体的COMPASS量表。

The COMPASS scale for the assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders.

作者信息

Robinson Delbert G, John Majnu, Miller Alexander L, Schooler Nina R, Kane John M

机构信息

The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Departments of Psychiatry and of Molecular Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA; The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Institute of Behavioral Science, Manhasset, NY, USA; The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health System, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.

The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Institute of Behavioral Science, Manhasset, NY, USA; Hofstra University, Department of Mathematics, Hempstead, NY, USA.

出版信息

Schizophr Res. 2024 Dec;274:307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.009. Epub 2024 Oct 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychosis symptom assessment instruments are rarely used in US mental health community clinical practice despite the advantages of measurement-based care. Barriers include the length of typical scales and that data for scale evaluation often come from researcher and not clinician raters.

STUDY DESIGN

The 12-item COMPASS symptom assessment was designed for the RAISE-ETP study of early phase psychosis. Ratings were done by community facility clinicians. COMPASS psychometric properties were examined with a Mokken scale analysis. Subsequently, Mokken analyses were done on 10-item COMPASS data from the ESPRITO learning health system.

STUDY RESULTS

3600 RAISE-ETP COMPASS assessments were examined. The COMPASS 12-item version fulfilled Mokken scale criteria for unidimensionality (H = 0.329 (SE:0.007)) as did a derived reduced 10-item version (H = 0.359 (SE:0.007)) and 5-item version (H = 0.396 (SE = 0.009)). The 12-item version showed one significant monotonicity violation; no significant violations were found in the reduced item versions. Of the reduced item versions, clinicians preferred the 10-item over the 5-item version. In the ESPRITO data, both the 10-item and 5-item versions met unidimensionality criteria (H = 0.458 (SE:0.030) and 0.478 (0.034) respectively) with no monotonicity violations.

CONCLUSIONS

The COMPASS scale offers clinicians versions with varying lengths for assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders in community settings. COMPASS can also facilitate data collection for large scale initiatives; the 10-item version is a symptom assessment option in the US national EPINET project.

摘要

背景

尽管基于测量的护理具有诸多优势,但精神病症状评估工具在美国心理健康社区临床实践中很少使用。障碍包括典型量表的长度,以及量表评估数据通常来自研究人员而非临床评估者。

研究设计

12项COMPASS症状评估工具是为早期精神病的RAISE-ETP研究而设计的。由社区机构的临床医生进行评分。采用莫肯量表分析来检验COMPASS的心理测量特性。随后,对来自ESPRITO学习健康系统的10项COMPASS数据进行了莫肯分析。

研究结果

对3600份RAISE-ETP COMPASS评估进行了检查。COMPASS的12项版本符合莫肯量表的单维性标准(H = 0.329(标准误:0.007)),一个派生的简化10项版本(H = 0.359(标准误:0.007))和5项版本(H = 0.396(标准误 = 0.009))也是如此。12项版本显示有一个显著的单调性违背;在简化项目版本中未发现显著违背。在简化项目版本中,临床医生更喜欢10项版本而非5项版本。在ESPRITO数据中,10项和5项版本均符合单维性标准(分别为H = 0.458(标准误:0.030)和0.478(0.034)),且无单调性违背。

结论

COMPASS量表为临床医生提供了不同长度的版本,用于在社区环境中评估首发精神病性障碍患者。COMPASS还可以促进大规模项目的数据收集;10项版本是美国国家EPINET项目中的一种症状评估选项。

相似文献

1
The COMPASS scale for the assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders.
Schizophr Res. 2024 Dec;274:307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.009. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
Clinical and psychometric validation of the psychotic depression assessment scale.
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 1;173:261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
3
The Symptom Checklist-core depression (SCL-CD6) scale: psychometric properties of a brief six item scale for the assessment of depression.
Scand J Public Health. 2014 Feb;42(1):82-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494813500591. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales.
Compr Psychiatry. 2011 Jan-Feb;52(1):102-8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.04.014. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
9
French Validation of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS).
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;70(4):312-319. doi: 10.1177/07067437251328350. Epub 2025 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The problem of missing data for learning health systems focused on first-episode psychosis.
Schizophr Res. 2025 May;279:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2025.03.021. Epub 2025 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
A Survey of Behavioral Health Care Providers on Use and Barriers to Use of Measurement-Based Care.
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Apr 1;74(4):349-357. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100735. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
3
Psychopharmacological Treatment in the RAISE-ETP Study: Outcomes of a Manual and Computer Decision Support System Based Intervention.
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;175(2):169-179. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16080919. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
Monitoring Treatment Progress and Providing Feedback is Viewed Favorably but Rarely Used in Practice.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jan;45(1):48-61. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0763-0.
5
A Tipping Point for Measurement-Based Care.
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Feb 1;68(2):179-188. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500439. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
PANSS-6: a brief rating scale for the measurement of severity in schizophrenia.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Jun;133(6):436-44. doi: 10.1111/acps.12526. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
8
Why some clinicians use outcome measures and others do not.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007 May;34(3):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0110-y. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
9
The Texas medication algorithm project: clinical results for schizophrenia.
Schizophr Bull. 2004;30(3):627-47. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007111.
10
Index for rating diagnostic tests.
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验