Robinson Delbert G, John Majnu, Miller Alexander L, Schooler Nina R, Kane John M
The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Departments of Psychiatry and of Molecular Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA; The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Institute of Behavioral Science, Manhasset, NY, USA; The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health System, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Institute of Behavioral Science, Manhasset, NY, USA; Hofstra University, Department of Mathematics, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2024 Dec;274:307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.009. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
Psychosis symptom assessment instruments are rarely used in US mental health community clinical practice despite the advantages of measurement-based care. Barriers include the length of typical scales and that data for scale evaluation often come from researcher and not clinician raters.
The 12-item COMPASS symptom assessment was designed for the RAISE-ETP study of early phase psychosis. Ratings were done by community facility clinicians. COMPASS psychometric properties were examined with a Mokken scale analysis. Subsequently, Mokken analyses were done on 10-item COMPASS data from the ESPRITO learning health system.
3600 RAISE-ETP COMPASS assessments were examined. The COMPASS 12-item version fulfilled Mokken scale criteria for unidimensionality (H = 0.329 (SE:0.007)) as did a derived reduced 10-item version (H = 0.359 (SE:0.007)) and 5-item version (H = 0.396 (SE = 0.009)). The 12-item version showed one significant monotonicity violation; no significant violations were found in the reduced item versions. Of the reduced item versions, clinicians preferred the 10-item over the 5-item version. In the ESPRITO data, both the 10-item and 5-item versions met unidimensionality criteria (H = 0.458 (SE:0.030) and 0.478 (0.034) respectively) with no monotonicity violations.
The COMPASS scale offers clinicians versions with varying lengths for assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders in community settings. COMPASS can also facilitate data collection for large scale initiatives; the 10-item version is a symptom assessment option in the US national EPINET project.
尽管基于测量的护理具有诸多优势,但精神病症状评估工具在美国心理健康社区临床实践中很少使用。障碍包括典型量表的长度,以及量表评估数据通常来自研究人员而非临床评估者。
12项COMPASS症状评估工具是为早期精神病的RAISE-ETP研究而设计的。由社区机构的临床医生进行评分。采用莫肯量表分析来检验COMPASS的心理测量特性。随后,对来自ESPRITO学习健康系统的10项COMPASS数据进行了莫肯分析。
对3600份RAISE-ETP COMPASS评估进行了检查。COMPASS的12项版本符合莫肯量表的单维性标准(H = 0.329(标准误:0.007)),一个派生的简化10项版本(H = 0.359(标准误:0.007))和5项版本(H = 0.396(标准误 = 0.009))也是如此。12项版本显示有一个显著的单调性违背;在简化项目版本中未发现显著违背。在简化项目版本中,临床医生更喜欢10项版本而非5项版本。在ESPRITO数据中,10项和5项版本均符合单维性标准(分别为H = 0.458(标准误:0.030)和0.478(0.034)),且无单调性违背。
COMPASS量表为临床医生提供了不同长度的版本,用于在社区环境中评估首发精神病性障碍患者。COMPASS还可以促进大规模项目的数据收集;10项版本是美国国家EPINET项目中的一种症状评估选项。