Golbin Jem M, Shukla Neehal, Nero Neil, Hockstein Maxwell A, Tonelli Adriano R, Siuba Matthew T
Department of Internal Medicine Community Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA.
The Cleveland Clinic Floyd D. Loop Alumni Library, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA.
Pulm Circ. 2024 Oct 21;14(4):e70004. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70004. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Right ventricle-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling describes the energetic relationship between RV contractility and its afterload. The gold standard for assessment of this relationship requires invasive pressure-volume (PV) loop measurements. Non-invasive surrogates of RV-PA coupling have been developed, such as the echocardiographic tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratio (TAPSE/PASP), but their performance has not been systematically assessed. We sought to assess performance of TAPSE/PASP ratio compared to PV loop-defined RV-PA coupling. A systematic search was conducted. Studies were included if PV loop derived RV-PA coupling metrics were compared to echocardiographic or magnetic resonance imaging surrogates. We conducted a meta-analysis of TAPSE/PASP correlation to PV loop-defined RV-PA coupling. 1452 studies were identified in the initial search, of which ten met inclusion criteria. Five studies allowed for pooled analysis of TAPSE/PASP to Ees/Ea correlation ( = 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.65). There was moderate heterogeneity across the pooled studies. Despite the common use of Non-invasive surrogates of RV-PA coupling, there is only moderate correlation with gold standard measurements. These metrics do not inform on the individual components of RV-PA coupling, limiting their use in the management of patients with RV dysfunction.
右心室-肺动脉(RV-PA)耦合描述了右心室收缩力与其后负荷之间的能量关系。评估这种关系的金标准需要进行有创压力-容积(PV)环测量。已经开发出右心室-肺动脉耦合的非侵入性替代指标,如超声心动图三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移与肺动脉收缩压之比(TAPSE/PASP),但其性能尚未得到系统评估。我们试图评估TAPSE/PASP比值与PV环定义的右心室-肺动脉耦合相比的性能。进行了系统检索。如果将PV环得出的右心室-肺动脉耦合指标与超声心动图或磁共振成像替代指标进行比较,则纳入相关研究。我们对TAPSE/PASP与PV环定义的右心室-肺动脉耦合的相关性进行了荟萃分析。在初步检索中识别出1452项研究,其中10项符合纳入标准。5项研究允许对TAPSE/PASP与Ees/Ea相关性进行汇总分析(r = 0.52,95%置信区间0.36 - 0.65)。汇总研究之间存在中度异质性。尽管右心室-肺动脉耦合的非侵入性替代指标被广泛使用,但与金标准测量值的相关性仅为中度。这些指标无法反映右心室-肺动脉耦合的各个组成部分,限制了它们在右心室功能障碍患者管理中的应用。