• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同地区[具体所指未给出]与肠道微生物群的比较分析。

Comparative Analyses of and Gut Microbiota in Different Regions.

作者信息

Zhu Fei, Sun Ke, Zhang He, Lu Jing, Guo Peng, Zhang Jiaqi, Xu Yu, Lyu Bing

机构信息

School of Life Sciences Guizhou Normal University Guiyang Guizhou China.

Guizhou Academy of Forestry Guiyang Guizhou China.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct 22;14(10):e70480. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70480. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.70480
PMID:39440211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11495892/
Abstract

The interactions between hosts and the gut microbiota are intricate and can significantly affect the ecology and evolution of both parties. Various host traits, including taxonomy, diet, social behaviour, and external factors such as prey availability and the local environment, all play an important role in shaping composition and diversity of the gut microbiogta. In this study, we explored the impact of intestinal microorganisms on the host in adapting to their respective ecological niches in two species of snakes. We collected feces from and from different geographical locations and used 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology to sequence the v3-v4 region. The results revealed that there was no significant difference in the alpha diversity of intestinal microorganisms between and . The gut microbiota of all individuals comprised four main phyla: Pseudomonadota, Bacteroidota, Bacillota, and Actinomycetota. At the genus level, the genus dominated the enterobacterial microbiota in the samples from Hainan, while there was no obvious dominant genus in the enterobacterial microbiota of the samples from the other four localities. Comparative analysis of enzyme families annotated to the gut microbiota between and from the four sampling regions by CAZy carbohydrate annotation revealed that nine enzyme families differed significantly in terms of glycoside hydrolases (GHs). In addition, we compared the composition of gut microbial communities between and and investigated the impact of the differences on their functions. Our results will provide insights into the coevolution of host and gut microbes.

摘要

宿主与肠道微生物群之间的相互作用错综复杂,会显著影响双方的生态和进化。各种宿主特征,包括分类学、饮食、社会行为,以及猎物可获得性和当地环境等外部因素,在塑造肠道微生物群的组成和多样性方面都发挥着重要作用。在本研究中,我们探讨了肠道微生物对两种蛇类宿主适应各自生态位的影响。我们从不同地理位置收集了[蛇的种类1]和[蛇的种类2]的粪便,并使用16S rRNA基因测序技术对v3 - v4区域进行测序。结果显示,[蛇的种类1]和[蛇的种类2]肠道微生物的α多样性没有显著差异。所有个体的肠道微生物群包括四个主要门类:假单胞菌门、拟杆菌门、芽孢杆菌门和放线菌门。在属水平上,[具体属名]在海南样本的肠道细菌微生物群中占主导地位,而在其他四个地点样本的肠道细菌微生物群中没有明显的优势属。通过CAZy碳水化合物注释对四个采样区域的[蛇的种类1]和[蛇的种类2]肠道微生物群注释的酶家族进行比较分析发现,九个酶家族在糖苷水解酶(GHs)方面存在显著差异。此外,我们比较了[蛇的种类1]和[蛇的种类2]肠道微生物群落的组成,并研究了这些差异对其功能的影响。我们的结果将为宿主与肠道微生物的共同进化提供见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/373f0d7aa920/ECE3-14-e70480-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/6ab1b8f62d3f/ECE3-14-e70480-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/7bcab89ef53f/ECE3-14-e70480-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/b32f9bf3bd68/ECE3-14-e70480-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/9a3e53760ec9/ECE3-14-e70480-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/9447a42b284f/ECE3-14-e70480-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/64faab5e6059/ECE3-14-e70480-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/3ff9688e6a02/ECE3-14-e70480-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/804c770edaea/ECE3-14-e70480-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/111c5b5a28a0/ECE3-14-e70480-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/6e88d8da70d7/ECE3-14-e70480-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/44293fc909d8/ECE3-14-e70480-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/373f0d7aa920/ECE3-14-e70480-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/6ab1b8f62d3f/ECE3-14-e70480-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/7bcab89ef53f/ECE3-14-e70480-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/b32f9bf3bd68/ECE3-14-e70480-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/9a3e53760ec9/ECE3-14-e70480-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/9447a42b284f/ECE3-14-e70480-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/64faab5e6059/ECE3-14-e70480-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/3ff9688e6a02/ECE3-14-e70480-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/804c770edaea/ECE3-14-e70480-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/111c5b5a28a0/ECE3-14-e70480-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/6e88d8da70d7/ECE3-14-e70480-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/44293fc909d8/ECE3-14-e70480-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b24/11495892/373f0d7aa920/ECE3-14-e70480-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analyses of and Gut Microbiota in Different Regions.不同地区[具体所指未给出]与肠道微生物群的比较分析。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct 22;14(10):e70480. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70480. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Characteristics of Microbiota in Different Segments of the Digestive Tract of ..消化道不同节段微生物群的特征
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 17;13(4):731. doi: 10.3390/ani13040731.
3
Genetic relationships between efficiency traits and gut microbiota traits in growing pigs being fed with a conventional or a high-fiber diet.在饲喂常规或高纤维日粮的生长猪中,效率性状与肠道微生物区系性状之间的遗传关系。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Jun 1;100(6). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac183.
4
Genetic hypogonadal mouse model reveals niche-specific influence of reproductive axis and sex on intestinal microbial communities.遗传型性腺功能减退症小鼠模型揭示了生殖轴和性别对肠道微生物群落的特定小生境影响。
Biol Sex Differ. 2023 Nov 6;14(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13293-023-00564-1.
5
Characterization of the bacterial microbiota in different gut and oral compartments of splendid japalure (Japalura sensu lato).灿烂锦蛇(广义锦蛇属)不同肠道和口腔部位细菌微生物群的特征。
BMC Vet Res. 2022 May 27;18(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03300-w.
6
Using 16S rDNA and metagenomic sequencing technology to analyze the fecal microbiome of children with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder.采用 16S rDNA 和宏基因组测序技术分析回避/限制型食物摄入障碍儿童的粪便微生物组。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 20;13(1):20253. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47760-y.
7
Factors shaping the gut microbiome of five species of lizards from different habitats.影响 5 种不同生境蜥蜴肠道微生物组的因素。
PeerJ. 2023 May 9;11:e15146. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15146. eCollection 2023.
8
Influence of mode of delivery on infant gut microbiota composition: a pilot study.分娩方式对婴儿肠道微生物组成的影响:一项初步研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;44(1):2368829. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2024.2368829. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
9
[Analysis of the dynamic changes in gut microbiota in patients with extremely severe burns by 16S ribosomal RNA high-throughput sequencing technology].[16S核糖体RNA高通量测序技术分析特重度烧伤患者肠道微生物群的动态变化]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 20;36(12):1159-1166. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200518-00271.
10
Comparative Analysis of the Gut Microbiota of Adult Mosquitoes From Eight Locations in Hainan, China.中国海南 8 个地点成蚊肠道微生物的比较分析。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Dec 15;10:596750. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.596750. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Fecal and oral microbiome analysis of snakes from China reveals a novel natural emerging disease reservoir.对来自中国的蛇类进行的粪便和口腔微生物组分析揭示了一个新的自然出现的疾病宿主。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jan 11;14:1339188. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1339188. eCollection 2023.
2
16S rRNA gene-based meta-analysis of the reptile gut microbiota reveals environmental effects, host influences and a limited core microbiota.基于 16S rRNA 基因的爬行动物体内微生物组元分析揭示了环境影响、宿主影响和有限的核心微生物组。
Mol Ecol. 2023 Nov;32(22):6044-6058. doi: 10.1111/mec.17153. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Influence of phylogenetic, environmental, and behavioral factors on the gut bacterial community structure of dung beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in a Neotropical Biosphere Reserve.
系统发育、环境和行为因素对新热带生物圈保护区中蜣螂(金龟科:金龟亚科)肠道细菌群落结构的影响
Front Microbiol. 2023 Sep 5;14:1224601. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1224601. eCollection 2023.
4
Differences in the luminal and mucosal gut microbiomes and metabolomes of oriental rat snake (Ptyas mucosus).东方蝰(Ptyas mucosus)肠道腔和黏膜微生物组和代谢组的差异。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023 May;107(10):3257-3271. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12524-1. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Characteristics of Microbiota in Different Segments of the Digestive Tract of ..消化道不同节段微生物群的特征
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 17;13(4):731. doi: 10.3390/ani13040731.
6
Changes in the gut microbiota of forest musk deer () during conservation.林麝在保护期间肠道微生物群的变化
Front Microbiol. 2022 Sep 8;13:969593. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.969593. eCollection 2022.
7
Proximate Drivers of Population-Level Lizard Gut Microbial Diversity: Impacts of Diet, Insularity, and Local Environment.种群水平蜥蜴肠道微生物多样性的直接驱动因素:饮食、岛屿状态和当地环境的影响
Microorganisms. 2022 Jul 31;10(8):1550. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10081550.
8
High-Altitude Drives the Convergent Evolution of Alpha Diversity and Indicator Microbiota in the Gut Microbiomes of Ungulates.高海拔驱动有蹄类动物肠道微生物群中α多样性和指示微生物群的趋同进化。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 7;13:953234. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.953234. eCollection 2022.
9
Multi-Omics Approaches Revealed the Associations of Host Metabolism and Gut Microbiome With Phylogeny and Environmental Adaptation in Mountain Dragons.多组学方法揭示了山地龙宿主代谢和肠道微生物群与系统发育及环境适应性的关联。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jun 28;13:913700. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.913700. eCollection 2022.
10
Gut Microbiome Differences in Rescued Common Kestrels () Before and After Captivity.获救红隼在圈养前后的肠道微生物组差异。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jun 20;13:858592. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.858592. eCollection 2022.