Erlandson Grant, Magzamen Sheryl, Sharp Julia L, Seidel James, Poole Jill A, Bradford Mary, Schaeffer Joshua W
Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Agromedicine. 2025 Jan;30(1):27-37. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2416425. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
Increased risk of occupational exposure to bioaerosols has long been recognized in livestock operations including dairy facilities. Spanning the inhalable fraction (0-100 μm), dairy bioaerosols comprise a wide variety of inflammatory components that deposit in the nasopharyngeal region. The resultant inflammatory response from bioaerosol exposure is likely driving the increased prevalence of respiratory disease observed in dairy workers. It is also thought the microbiome of the upper respiratory system may help mediate this inflammation. We investigated the viability of a low-cost hypertonic saline nasal rinse intervention in modulating inflammatory responses in bioaerosol exposed dairy workers and its impact on microbial diversity.
Pre- and post-shift nasal rinses were administered and collected alongside full shift inhalable personal breathing zone (PBZ) samples for each participant for up to 5 consecutive days. Treatment group participants ( = 23) received hypertonic saline rinses while control group participants ( = 22) received normotonic saline rinses. Particulate matter (PM) and endotoxin concentrations were quantified from PBZ samples using gravimetric and enzymatic analytical methods, respectively. Pre- and post-shift rinses were analyzed for pro- and anti-inflammatory markers and microbial diversity using a multiplex assay and 16S rRNA sequencing, respectively.
PM and endotoxin concentrations were comparable between groups indicating similar exposures. Post-shift pro-inflammatory markers were significantly higher than pre-shift for IL-13 ( = .047), IL-1β ( < .001), IL-6 ( < .001), IL-8 ( < .001), and TNF-α ( = .024). There was no evidence of a difference in log concentrations between intervention group or day among any of the measured inflammatory markers. Anti-inflammatory IL-10 concentrations increased across the 5 sample days, independent of treatment group suggesting tonicity may not be driving the change. However, this result was not significant ( = .217). Nasal microbiome alpha (within sample) and beta (between sample) diversity metrics did not differ significantly between group or day demonstrating no adverse washout intervention effects.
This study provided encouraging results that warrant future research to further evaluate saline nasal rinses as a workplace intervention.
长期以来,人们一直认识到在包括乳制品厂在内的畜牧生产作业中,职业接触生物气溶胶的风险会增加。乳制品生物气溶胶涵盖可吸入部分(0 - 100μm),包含多种沉积在鼻咽区域的炎症成分。生物气溶胶暴露引发的炎症反应可能导致乳制品工人呼吸道疾病患病率上升。人们还认为上呼吸道微生物群可能有助于调节这种炎症。我们研究了一种低成本高渗盐水鼻腔冲洗干预措施对暴露于生物气溶胶的乳制品工人炎症反应的调节作用及其对微生物多样性的影响。
连续5天,在每个参与者班前和班后进行鼻腔冲洗并收集冲洗液,同时收集整个班次的可吸入个人呼吸区(PBZ)样本。治疗组参与者(n = 23)接受高渗盐水冲洗,而对照组参与者(n = 22)接受等渗盐水冲洗。分别使用重量法和酶分析法从PBZ样本中定量颗粒物(PM)和内毒素浓度。班前和班后冲洗液分别使用多重检测法和16S rRNA测序分析促炎和抗炎标志物以及微生物多样性。
两组之间的PM和内毒素浓度相当,表明暴露情况相似。班后促炎标志物IL - 13(P = 0.047)、IL - 1β(P < 0.001)、IL - 6(P < 0.001)、IL - 8(P < 0.001)和TNF - α(P = 0.024)显著高于班前。在任何测量的炎症标志物中,干预组或不同天数之间的对数浓度均无差异证据。抗炎性IL - 10浓度在5个采样日中均有所增加,与治疗组无关,这表明渗透压可能不是导致变化的原因。然而,这一结果并不显著(P = 0.217)。鼻腔微生物群的α(样本内)和β(样本间)多样性指标在组间或不同天数之间无显著差异,表明冲洗干预没有不良影响。
本研究提供了令人鼓舞的结果,值得未来进一步研究以进一步评估盐水鼻腔冲洗作为一种工作场所干预措施的效果。