Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, UAntwerpen, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2416432. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2416432. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
As researchers in primary care, we want to drive change in practice and conduct research that sparks meaningful transformation. These changes can only happen if our research work resonates in a meaningful way with the people who they are designed for, i.e. the healthcare professionals and the patients.
This viewpoint stems from first-hand insights gained as a social scientist engaged in trials and primary care research amidst epidemics and pandemics. Some examples stemming from the EU Funded GRACE INTRO, RECOVER and Prudence trial illustrate these experiences. I outline how primary care can effectively address the pressing challenges it encounters, whether as researchers, members of the public, or healthcare professionals, and how to integrate successfully social sciences within clinical primary care research.
As interdisciplinary researchers, social scientists and medical researchers can work together under certain conditions, i.e. equal status, adequate resources, and seamless integration within trial structures.
作为基层医疗的研究人员,我们希望推动实践变革,并开展能够引发有意义变革的研究。只有当我们的研究工作与设计对象——医疗保健专业人员和患者——产生共鸣时,这些变革才会发生。
本观点源自社会科学家在传染病和大流行期间参与试验和基层医疗研究的第一手见解。从欧盟资助的 GRACE INTRO、RECOVER 和 Prudence 试验中获得的一些示例说明了这些经验。我概述了基层医疗如何能够有效地应对其面临的紧迫挑战,无论是作为研究人员、公众还是医疗保健专业人员,以及如何成功地将社会科学融入临床基层医疗研究中。
作为跨学科研究人员,社会科学家和医学研究人员可以在某些条件下合作,例如平等的地位、充足的资源以及在试验结构中的无缝整合。