Rakovitsky Nadya, Lurie-Weinberger Mor N, Temkin Elizabeth, Hameir Amichay, Efrati-Epchtien Reut, Wulffhart Liat, Keren Paz Alona, Schwartz David, Carmeli Yehuda
National Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Israel Ministry of Health, Tel Aviv, Israel.
School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Oct 23;12(12):e0089124. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00891-24.
There is an urgent need for accurate and fast diagnostic tests to identify carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Here, we evaluated a colorimetric imipenem hydrolysis test, called the CARBA PAcE test, to detect carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). We tested a collection of 270 GNB isolates with a characterized carbapenemase content. Our testing set included 205 carbapenemase-producing, carbapenemase-resistant () with 40 carbapenemase (KPC), 49 New Delhi metallo beta lactamase (NDM), 49 OXA-48-like, 15 Verona integron-mediated metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), three IMP, 43 IMI, six isolates producing more than one carbapenemase, and 65 non-carbapenemase-producing (20 ESBL producers, 35 non-carbapenemase-producing, carbapenem-resistant [non-CP CRE], and 10 carbapenem-susceptible [non-CP, non-CSE, third-generation cephalosporin and carbapenem susceptible]). We compared the performances of the CARBA PAcE test, the qualitative colorimetric β-CARBA test, and the modified CarbaNP test to a gold standard of carbapenemase gene detection by PCR. Specificities of all tests were high: 95.4% (62/65) for CARBA PAcE test, 98.5% (64/65) for β-CARBA test, and 100% (65/65) for the modified CarbaNP test. Sensitivity varied by carbapenemase: all three tests had a sensitivity of 100% for NDM, VIM, and IMP and 97.5% for KPC. Sensitivity to detect IMI was 0% for the CARBA PAcE and β-CARBA tests and 11.6% for the modified CarbaNP test. Sensitivity to detect OXA-48-like was 89.7% for the CARBA PAcE test, 87.7% for the β-CARBA test, and 14.2% for the modified CarbaNP test. Reading the results of the CARBA PAcE assay was difficult. The CARBA PAcE assay is highly sensitive for detecting NDM, VIM, IMP, and KPC, but slightly less sensitive for OXA-48-like. It does not detect IMI. It is highly specific, and its overall diagnostic accuracy is similar to that of β-CARBA. Its operational advantages are rapid turnaround time, ease of use, and long shelf life, but reading of results is subjective.IMPORTANCEWe evaluated the ability of the CARBA PAcE test to detect carbapenemases in 274 Gram-negative isolates with a known carbapenemase content. Specificity was high for all carbapenemases tested (96.9%). Sensitivity was high for KPC, NDM, VIM, and IMP (97.5-100%); but lower for OXA-48-like (89.7%). Activity of IMI could not be detected. Taken together, our results indicate that CARBA PAcE is a useful alternative in regions where NDM and KPC are predominant. The limitations of the test are difficulty in reading results and incompatibility with mSuperCARBA.
迫切需要准确快速的诊断测试来鉴定产碳青霉烯酶细菌。在此,我们评估了一种比色法亚胺培南水解试验,即CARBA PAcE试验,以检测产碳青霉烯酶的革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)。我们用一组已知碳青霉烯酶含量的270株GNB分离株进行了测试。我们的测试集包括205株产碳青霉烯酶且对碳青霉烯耐药的菌株(),其中40株产KPC碳青霉烯酶、49株产新德里金属β-内酰胺酶(NDM)、49株产OXA-48样酶、15株产维罗纳整合子介导的金属β-内酰胺酶(VIM)、3株产IMP酶、43株产IMI酶、6株产多种碳青霉烯酶,以及65株不产碳青霉烯酶的菌株(20株产超广谱β-内酰胺酶、35株不产碳青霉烯酶但对碳青霉烯耐药[非产碳青霉烯酶的耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科细菌,non-CP CRE],以及10株对碳青霉烯敏感的菌株[非产碳青霉烯酶、非产超广谱β-内酰胺酶、对第三代头孢菌素和碳青霉烯敏感])。我们将CARBA PAcE试验、定性比色β-CARBA试验和改良CarbaNP试验的性能与通过PCR检测碳青霉烯酶基因的金标准进行了比较。所有试验的特异性都很高:CARBA PAcE试验为95.4%(62/65),β-CARBA试验为98.5%(64/65),改良CarbaNP试验为100%(65/65)。不同碳青霉烯酶的敏感性有所不同:所有三项试验对NDM、VIM和IMP的敏感性均为100%,对KPC的敏感性为97.5%。CARBA PAcE试验和β-CARBA试验检测IMI的敏感性为0%,改良CarbaNP试验为11.6%。CARBA PAcE试验检测OXA-48样酶的敏感性为89.7%,β-CARBA试验为87.7%,改良CarbaNP试验为14.2%。读取CARBA PAcE试验结果存在困难。CARBA PAcE试验对检测NDM、VIM、IMP和KPC高度敏感,但对OXA-48样酶的敏感性略低。它无法检测IMI。其特异性很高,总体诊断准确性与β-CARBA相似。其操作优势在于周转时间快、使用方便且保质期长,但结果读取具有主观性。重要性我们评估了CARBA PAcE试验在274株已知碳青霉烯酶含量的革兰氏阴性分离株中检测碳青霉烯酶的能力。对所有测试的碳青霉烯酶而言,特异性都很高(96.9%)。对KPC、NDM、VIM和IMP的敏感性很高(97.5%-100%);但对OXA-48样酶的敏感性较低(89.7%)。无法检测到IMI的活性。总体而言,我们的结果表明,在以NDM和KPC为主的地区,CARBA PAcE是一种有用的替代方法。该试验的局限性在于结果读取困难以及与mSuperCARBA不兼容。