• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

介绍我们的定制GPT:个性化GPT构建器对科学写作潜在影响的一个例子。

Introducing Our Custom GPT: An Example of the Potential Impact of Personalized GPT Builders on Scientific Writing.

作者信息

Kabir Aymen, Shah Suraj, Haddad Alexander, Raper Daniel M S

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:461-468. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.041. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.041
PMID:39442688
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rapid progression of artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, has contributed to increase its utility and popularity in various fields. Discourse about AI's potential role in different aspects of scientific literature such as writing, data analysis, and literature review, is growing as the programs continue to improve their capabilities. This study utilizes a recently released ChatGPT tool that allows users to create customized GPTs to highlight the potential of customizable GPTs tailored to prepare and write research manuscripts.

METHODS

We developed our 2 GPTs, Neurosurgical Research Paper Writer and Medi Research Assistant, through iterative refinement of ChatGPT 4.0's tool, GPT Builder. This process included providing specific and thorough instructions along with repetitive testing and feedback-driven adjustments to finalize a version of the model that fit our needs.

RESULTS

The GPT models that we created were able to efficiently and consistently produce accurate outputs from inputted prompts based on their specific configurations. It effectively analyzed existing literature that it found and synthesized information in ways that were reliable and written in ways comparable to manuscripts authored by scientific professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

While the ability of modern AI to generate scientific manuscripts has shown significant progress, the persistence of fallacies and miscalculations suggest that the development of GPTs requires extensive calibration before achieving greater reliability and consistency. Nevertheless, the prospective horizon of AI-driven research holds promise in streamlining the publication workflow and increasing accessibility to novel research.

摘要

背景

人工智能(AI)和大型语言模型(LLMs),如ChatGPT的迅速发展,促使其在各个领域的实用性和受欢迎程度不断提高。随着这些程序不断提升其能力,关于AI在科学文献的不同方面,如写作、数据分析和文献综述中可能发挥的作用的讨论也日益增多。本研究利用了最近发布的ChatGPT工具,该工具允许用户创建定制的GPT,以突出定制GPT在准备和撰写研究手稿方面的潜力。

方法

我们通过对ChatGPT 4.0的工具GPT Builder进行迭代优化,开发了两个GPT,即神经外科研究论文撰写器和医学研究助手。这个过程包括提供具体而全面的指令,以及反复测试和基于反馈的调整,以确定一个符合我们需求的模型版本。

结果

我们创建的GPT模型能够根据其特定配置,从输入的提示中高效且一致地生成准确的输出。它有效地分析了找到的现有文献,并以可靠的方式综合信息,其撰写方式可与科学专业人员撰写的手稿相媲美。

结论

虽然现代AI生成科学手稿的能力已取得显著进展,但错误和误算的存在表明,在实现更高的可靠性和一致性之前,GPT的开发需要进行广泛的校准。尽管如此,AI驱动研究的前景有望简化出版流程并增加获取新研究的机会。

相似文献

1
Introducing Our Custom GPT: An Example of the Potential Impact of Personalized GPT Builders on Scientific Writing.介绍我们的定制GPT:个性化GPT构建器对科学写作潜在影响的一个例子。
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:461-468. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.041. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Emotional prompting amplifies disinformation generation in AI large language models.情感提示会放大人工智能大语言模型中的虚假信息生成。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Apr 7;8:1543603. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1543603. eCollection 2025.
3
Large Language Models and Empathy: Systematic Review.大语言模型与同理心:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 11;26:e52597. doi: 10.2196/52597.
4
Stench of Errors or the Shine of Potential: The Challenge of (Ir)Responsible Use of ChatGPT in Speech-Language Pathology.错误的恶臭还是潜力的光辉:言语病理学中(不)负责任地使用ChatGPT的挑战。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70088.
5
Exploring the possibilities and limitations of customized large language model to support and improve cervical cancer screening.探索定制大语言模型以支持和改进宫颈癌筛查的可能性与局限性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03088-3.
6
Performance of ChatGPT Across Different Versions in Medical Licensing Examinations Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ChatGPT 在全球医学执照考试不同版本中的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 25;26:e60807. doi: 10.2196/60807.
7
Generative AI's healthcare professional role creep: a cross-sectional evaluation of publicly accessible, customised health-related GPTs.生成式人工智能在医疗保健专业领域的角色蔓延:对公开可用的定制健康相关生成式预训练变换器模型的横断面评估
Front Public Health. 2025 May 9;13:1584348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1584348. eCollection 2025.
8
Large Language Model Architectures in Health Care: Scoping Review of Research Perspectives.医疗保健中的大语言模型架构:研究视角的范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 19;27:e70315. doi: 10.2196/70315.
9
Evaluating a Large Language Model's Ability to Synthesize a Health Science Master's Thesis: Case Study.评估大型语言模型合成健康科学硕士论文的能力:案例研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 3;9:e73248. doi: 10.2196/73248.
10
Public Versus Academic Discourse on ChatGPT in Health Care: Mixed Methods Study.医疗保健领域中关于ChatGPT的公众与学术话语:混合方法研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jun 23;5:e64509. doi: 10.2196/64509.