Piumatti Giovanni, Costa Manuel João, Alcorta-Garza Adelina, Ardenghi Stefano, Baroffio Anne, Elorduy Marta, Gerbase Margaret W, Gustin Marie-Paule, Palés Jordi, Quince Thelma, Rampoldi Giulia, Strepparava Maria Grazia, Thiemann Pia, Virumbrales Montserrat, Vivanco Luis, Costa Patrício S
Fondazione Agnelli, Turin, Italy.
Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Oct 23:1632787241296540. doi: 10.1177/01632787241296540.
This study aimed to examine the factorial structure of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Medical student version (JSE-S) and assess items' discriminatory ability at higher and lower empathy levels in medical student populations from different countries and languages. JSE-S datasets were retrieved from previous studies of 4113 first- and/or second-year medical students from Switzerland, Portugal, Italy, Brazil, France, Spain, New Zealand, UK, Ireland, Mexico, and Peru. Parallel principal component analyses and item response theory were applied. Excluding item 18, the Compassionate Care subscale emerged in five samples (Switzerland, Portugal, Italy, France and UK/Ireland), Perspective Taking in three (Switzerland, Portugal and UK/Ireland) and Walking in Patient's Shoes in five (Switzerland, Portugal, Spain, UK/Ireland and Mexico/Peru). All subscales had items providing overlapping information. The JSE-S subscales had reliable high test performance at low empathy levels, while when the JSE-S increased, the standard error also increased. There was no consistent support across countries for the JSE-S three-factorial structure. Items provided redundant information and discriminatory power decreased when aiming to differentiate students at high empathy levels. A JSE-S revision to improve cross-cultural comparability, results' generalizability and validity should focus on suppressing or reformulating items that cannot differentiate medical students' empathy.
本研究旨在检验杰斐逊共情量表-医学生版(JSE-S)的因子结构,并评估该量表在来自不同国家、使用不同语言的医学生群体中,于高低共情水平下各项目的区分能力。JSE-S数据集取自之前对来自瑞士、葡萄牙、意大利、巴西、法国、西班牙、新西兰、英国、爱尔兰、墨西哥和秘鲁的4113名一年级和/或二年级医学生的研究。研究应用了平行主成分分析和项目反应理论。排除第18项后,“关爱护理”子量表在五个样本(瑞士、葡萄牙、意大利、法国和英国/爱尔兰)中出现,“观点采择”子量表在三个样本(瑞士、葡萄牙和英国/爱尔兰)中出现,“设身处地为患者着想”子量表在五个样本(瑞士、葡萄牙、西班牙、英国/爱尔兰和墨西哥/秘鲁)中出现。所有子量表均有提供重叠信息的项目。JSE-S子量表在低共情水平时具有可靠的高测试性能,但随着JSE-S得分增加,标准误差也会增加。对于JSE-S的三因子结构,各国之间没有一致的支持。各项目提供了冗余信息,在旨在区分高共情水平学生时,区分能力下降。为提高跨文化可比性、结果的可推广性和有效性而对JSE-S进行修订时,应着重抑制或重新制定无法区分医学生共情水平的项目。