• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混合变量图形建模框架,用于预测脊髓损伤患者的医院获得性压疮风险。

Mixed-variable graphical modeling framework towards risk prediction of hospital-acquired pressure injury in spinal cord injury individuals.

机构信息

Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zürich, 8006, Zürich, Switzerland.

Swiss Paraplegic Research (SPF), 6207, Nottwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 23;14(1):25067. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75691-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-75691-9
PMID:39443567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11499609/
Abstract

Developing machine learning (ML) methods for healthcare predictive modeling requires absolute explainability and transparency to build trust and accountability. Graphical models (GM) are key tools for this but face challenges like small sample sizes, mixed variables, and latent confounders. This paper presents a novel learning framework addressing these challenges by integrating latent variables using fast causal inference (FCI), accommodating mixed variables with predictive permutation conditional independence tests (PPCIT), and employing a systematic graphical embedding approach leveraging expert knowledge. This method ensures a transparent model structure and an explainable feature selection and modeling approach, achieving competitive prediction performance. For real-world validation, data of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) were used, where the approach achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.941 and an AUC of 0.983, outperforming most benchmarks. The PPCIT method also demonstrated superior accuracy and scalability over other benchmarks in causal discovery validation on synthetic datasets that closely resemble our real dataset. This holistic framework effectively addresses the challenges of mixed variables and explainable predictive modeling for disease onset, which is crucial for enabling transparency and interpretability in ML-based healthcare.

摘要

开发用于医疗保健预测建模的机器学习 (ML) 方法需要绝对的可解释性和透明度,以建立信任和问责制。图形模型 (GM) 是实现这一目标的关键工具,但面临着样本量小、混合变量和潜在混杂因素等挑战。本文提出了一种新颖的学习框架,通过使用快速因果推理 (FCI) 整合潜在变量、使用预测排列条件独立性检验 (PPCIT) 处理混合变量以及利用专家知识采用系统图形嵌入方法,解决了这些挑战。该方法确保了模型结构的透明性以及可解释的特征选择和建模方法,实现了具有竞争力的预测性能。在真实世界的验证中,我们使用了脊髓损伤 (SCI) 个体的医院获得性压力性损伤 (HAPI) 数据,该方法在平衡准确性方面达到了 0.941,AUC 达到了 0.983,优于大多数基准。在对我们的真实数据集非常相似的合成数据集上进行因果发现验证时,PPCIT 方法在准确性和可扩展性方面也优于其他基准。该整体框架有效地解决了混合变量和可解释预测建模在疾病发作方面的挑战,这对于实现基于机器学习的医疗保健的透明度和可解释性至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/40aea0bd6369/41598_2024_75691_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/706213d0c10d/41598_2024_75691_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/78ce29bd6011/41598_2024_75691_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/8e52369a962a/41598_2024_75691_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/175161881856/41598_2024_75691_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/49f5b35e13bf/41598_2024_75691_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/9f4cf52f6497/41598_2024_75691_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/40aea0bd6369/41598_2024_75691_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/706213d0c10d/41598_2024_75691_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/78ce29bd6011/41598_2024_75691_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/8e52369a962a/41598_2024_75691_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/175161881856/41598_2024_75691_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/49f5b35e13bf/41598_2024_75691_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/9f4cf52f6497/41598_2024_75691_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4247/11499609/40aea0bd6369/41598_2024_75691_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mixed-variable graphical modeling framework towards risk prediction of hospital-acquired pressure injury in spinal cord injury individuals.混合变量图形建模框架,用于预测脊髓损伤患者的医院获得性压疮风险。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 23;14(1):25067. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75691-9.
2
Development of the spinal cord injury pressure sore onset risk screening (SCI-PreSORS) instrument: a pressure injury risk decision tree for spinal cord injury rehabilitation.脊髓损伤压力性溃疡发病风险筛查(SCI-PreSORS)工具的研制:脊髓损伤康复的压力性损伤风险决策树。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Feb;59(2):123-131. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0510-y. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3
Machine learning to develop a predictive model of pressure injury in persons with spinal cord injury.机器学习在脊髓损伤患者压力性损伤预测模型中的应用。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Sep;61(9):513-520. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00924-z. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
4
Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Early Prediction of Pressure Injury Risk.可解释人工智能在压疮风险早期预测中的应用。
Am J Crit Care. 2024 Sep 1;33(5):373-381. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2024856.
5
COVID-Net Biochem: an explainability-driven framework to building machine learning models for predicting survival and kidney injury of COVID-19 patients from clinical and biochemistry data.COVID-Net 生化:一个基于可解释性的框架,用于构建基于临床和生化数据预测 COVID-19 患者生存和肾脏损伤的机器学习模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 9;13(1):17001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42203-0.
6
A systematic review of predictive models for hospital-acquired pressure injury using machine learning.基于机器学习的医院获得性压疮预测模型的系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2023 Mar;10(3):1234-1246. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1429. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
7
Risk factors for hospital acquired pressure injury in patients with spinal cord injury during first rehabilitation: prospective cohort study.脊髓损伤患者首次康复期间医院获得性压疮的危险因素:前瞻性队列研究
Spinal Cord. 2022 Jan;60(1):45-52. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00681-x. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
8
Predictive Value of Braden Risk Factors in Pressure Ulcers of Outpatients With Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤门诊患者压疮中Braden危险因素的预测价值
Acta Med Iran. 2018 Jan;56(1):56-61.
9
Determining Pressure Injury Risk on Admission to Inpatient Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Comparison of the FIM, Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale, and Braden Scale.入院时确定住院脊髓损伤康复患者的压疮风险:功能性独立性评定量表、脊髓损伤压疮量表和布雷登量表的比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct;100(10):1881-1887. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 May 1.
10
Expert-augmented automated machine learning optimizes hemodynamic predictors of spinal cord injury outcome.专家增强的自动化机器学习优化了脊髓损伤结果的血流动力学预测因子。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0265254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265254. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Global, regional and national burden of decubitus ulcers in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2021.1990年至2021年204个国家和地区的全球、区域和国家压疮负担:基于2021年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 26;13:1494229. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1494229. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk constellation of hospital acquired pressure injuries in patients with a spinal cord injury/ disorder - focus on time since spinal cord injury/ disorder and patients' age.医院获得性压疮在脊髓损伤/疾病患者中的风险组合——关注脊髓损伤/疾病发生时间和患者年龄。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Aug;61(8):453-459. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00910-5. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
2
Causal machine learning for healthcare and precision medicine.用于医疗保健和精准医学的因果机器学习。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 3;9(8):220638. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220638. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Pressure Injuries and Management after Spinal Cord Injury.
脊髓损伤后的压力性损伤及其管理
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 12;12(7):1130. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071130.
4
Modeling and prediction of pressure injury in hospitalized patients using artificial intelligence.利用人工智能对住院患者的压疮进行建模和预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Aug 30;21(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01608-5.
5
Risk factors for hospital acquired pressure injury in patients with spinal cord injury during first rehabilitation: prospective cohort study.脊髓损伤患者首次康复期间医院获得性压疮的危险因素:前瞻性队列研究
Spinal Cord. 2022 Jan;60(1):45-52. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00681-x. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
6
Using Machine Learning Technologies in Pressure Injury Management: Systematic Review.机器学习技术在压疮管理中的应用:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 10;9(3):e25704. doi: 10.2196/25704.
7
Describing Functioning in People Living With Spinal Cord Injury Across 22 Countries: A Graphical Modeling Approach.在 22 个国家/地区生活的脊髓损伤人群的功能描述:一种图形建模方法。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Dec;101(12):2112-2143. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.374. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees.利用可解释人工智能实现从局部解释到树木的全局理解
Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1):56-67. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
9
Machine intelligence in healthcare-perspectives on trustworthiness, explainability, usability, and transparency.医疗保健中的机器智能——关于可信度、可解释性、可用性和透明度的观点
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Mar 26;3:47. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0254-2. eCollection 2020.
10
Impact of spasticity on functioning in spinal cord injury: an application of graphical modelling.痉挛对脊髓损伤功能的影响:图形建模的应用。
J Rehabil Med. 2020 Mar 31;52(3):jrm00037. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2657.