• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消除生物医学研究中的性别偏见需要公平纳入孕妇和性别多样化人群。

Eliminating gender bias in biomedical research requires fair inclusion of pregnant women and gender diverse people.

作者信息

Shankar Mridula, Gülmezoglu A Metin, Vogel Joshua P, Goudar Shivaprasad S, McDougall Annie, Somannavar Manjunath S, Rushwan Sara, Pujar Yeshita V, Charantimath Umesh, Ammerdorffer Anne, Bohren Meghan A

机构信息

Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Concept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland/Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Oct 23;4(1):211. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00629-1.

DOI:10.1038/s43856-024-00629-1
PMID:39443672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11500090/
Abstract

Systematic under-representation of pregnant women and gender diverse pregnant people in clinical research has prevented them from benefitting fairly from biomedical advances. The resulting lack of pharmacological safety and efficacy data leads to medicine discontinuation, sub-optimal dosing, and reliance on repurposed therapies. We identify four roadblocks to fair inclusion. First, investment and research are inhibited by protectionist attitudes among research gatekeepers who view pregnancy as a vulnerable state. Second, exclusion ignores human-specific biological variations affecting medication absorption and impacts on the pregnant body. Third, pregnant populations in low-and middle-income countries face a double disadvantage due to gender and location, despite bearing a disproportionate maternal mortality burden. Fourth, perspectives and experiences of pregnant populations are undervalued in clinical intervention design. We propose five actions to optimize fair inclusion: fostering reciprocal partnerships, prioritizing multi-disciplinary research, awareness-raising of the need for pharmaceutical innovation, conducting regulatory analyses, and promoting responsible inclusion over presumptive exclusion.

摘要

孕妇和性别多元化的孕妇在临床研究中的系统性代表性不足,使她们无法公平地从生物医学进步中受益。由此导致的药理安全性和有效性数据的缺乏,导致药物停用、剂量未达最佳水平以及对重新利用疗法的依赖。我们确定了公平纳入的四个障碍。第一,研究把关人持保护主义态度,将怀孕视为脆弱状态,这抑制了投资和研究。第二,排除忽视了影响药物吸收以及对孕妇身体影响的人类特定生物学差异。第三,低收入和中等收入国家的孕妇群体尽管承受着过高的孕产妇死亡负担,但由于性别和地理位置而面临双重不利处境。第四,孕妇群体的观点和经历在临床干预设计中未得到重视。我们提出五项行动以优化公平纳入:建立互惠伙伴关系、优先开展多学科研究、提高对药物创新需求的认识、进行监管分析以及促进负责任的纳入而非推定排除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb8/11500090/0d71c3adc434/43856_2024_629_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb8/11500090/0d71c3adc434/43856_2024_629_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb8/11500090/0d71c3adc434/43856_2024_629_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Eliminating gender bias in biomedical research requires fair inclusion of pregnant women and gender diverse people.消除生物医学研究中的性别偏见需要公平纳入孕妇和性别多样化人群。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Oct 23;4(1):211. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00629-1.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
4
Author Correction: Eliminating gender bias in biomedical research requires fair inclusion of pregnant women and gender diverse people.作者更正:消除生物医学研究中的性别偏见需要公平纳入孕妇和性别多样化人群。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Dec 6;4(1):260. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00689-3.
5
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
6
Four Faces of Fair Subject Selection.公平的受试者选择的四个方面。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Feb;20(2):5-19. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1701731.
7
Including Pregnant Women in Clinical Research: Practical Guidance for Institutional Review Boards.将孕妇纳入临床研究:机构审查委员会实用指南
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Nov;41(6):35-40. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500036.
8
Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials: an integrated scientific and ethical approach.将孕妇合理纳入临床试验:一种科学与伦理相结合的方法。
Trials. 2018 Jan 29;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2402-9.
9
How the CIOMS guidelines contribute to fair inclusion of pregnant women in research.《CIOMS 指南如何促进公平纳入孕妇参与研究》。
Bioethics. 2019 Mar;33(3):367-373. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12520. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
10
Factors influencing the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials: A mixed-methods systematic review.影响孕妇和哺乳期妇女参与临床试验的因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2024 May 30;21(5):e1004405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004405. eCollection 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials: A mixed-methods systematic review.影响孕妇和哺乳期妇女参与临床试验的因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2024 May 30;21(5):e1004405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004405. eCollection 2024 May.
2
When dignity meets evidence.当尊严遇上证据。
Lancet. 2023 Feb 4;401(10374):340-341. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00176-9. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
3
Exclusion of pregnant people from emergency vaccine clinical trials: A systematic review of clinical trial protocols and reporting from 2009 to 2019.
将孕妇排除在紧急疫苗临床试验之外:2009 年至 2019 年临床试验方案和报告的系统评价。
Vaccine. 2023 Aug 7;41(35):5159-5181. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.073. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
4
Biological and pathological mechanisms leading to the birth of a small vulnerable newborn.导致弱小早产儿出生的生物学和病理学机制。
Lancet. 2023 May 20;401(10389):1720-1732. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00573-1. Epub 2023 May 8.
5
Walking the walk to include pregnant participants in non-obstetric clinical trials: Insights from the SNAP Trial.将孕妇纳入非产科临床试验的实际行动:来自SNAP试验的见解。
Obstet Med. 2023 Mar;16(1):3-4. doi: 10.1177/1753495X231163351. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
6
Eligibility and enrollment of pregnant and breastfeeding women in psychiatry randomized controlled trials.精神科随机对照试验中孕妇和哺乳期妇女的入选和纳入标准。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2023 Jun;26(3):353-359. doi: 10.1007/s00737-023-01319-y. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Systematic evaluation of the pre-eclampsia drugs, dietary supplements and biologicals pipeline using target product profiles.运用目标产品特性,系统性评估子痫前期药物、膳食补充剂和生物制剂研发管线。
BMC Med. 2022 Nov 4;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02582-z.
8
Gaps in evidence-based medicine: underrepresented populations still excluded from research trials following 2018 recommendations from the Health and Human Services Task Force on Research Specific to Pregnant Women and Lactating Women.循证医学的差距:根据卫生与公众服务部孕妇和哺乳期妇女专项研究特别工作组2018年的建议,研究试验中仍未充分纳入代表性不足的人群。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;227(6):908-909. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.009. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
9
Randomised trials in maternal and perinatal health in low and middle-income countries from 2010 to 2019: a systematic scoping review.2010 年至 2019 年在中低收入国家开展的孕产妇和围产医学随机试验:系统范围界定审查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 7;12(7):e059473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059473.
10
Clinical trials in pregnancy and the "shadows of thalidomide": Revisiting the legacy of Frances Kelsey.妊娠期临床试验和“反应停阴影”:重访弗朗西斯·凯尔西的遗产。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106806. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106806. Epub 2022 May 30.