• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠套叠水压灌肠复位术致肠穿孔的危险因素。

Risk factors of bowel perforation during hydrostatic enema reduction for paediatric intussusception.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2417181. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2417181. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1080/07853890.2024.2417181
PMID:39444147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11505585/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bowel perforation is a major, yet unstudied complication of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic enema reduction (UGHR). In this study, we aimed to explore the risk factors and determine the clinical characteristics of bowel perforation during UGHR for paediatric intussusception (P-UGHR).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the medical records of patients who underwent UGHR for intussusception at our institution between January 2011 and December 2021. The patients were divided into the P-UGHR and no P-UGHR groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to analyse the risk factors for P-UGHR, and the clinical characteristics of patients with P-UGHR were determined.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 4961 intussusception episodes. We identified 15 patients [eight male (53.3%); median age, 8.73 months; age range, 3-17 months] with P-UGHR. All P-UGHR cases involved colonic perforations without necrosis distal to the intussusception mass. The perforations were located in the ascending [40% (6/15)], transverse [46.7% (7/15)] or descending colon [13.3% (2/15)]. Age ≤10.5 months [odds ratio (OR), 3.636; 90% confidence interval (CI), 1.274-10.38;  = 0.043], bloody stools (OR, 4.189; 90% CI, 1.352-12.978;  = 0.037) and symptom duration >17.5 h (OR, 0.188; 90% CI, 0.053-0.666;  = 0.03) were independent risk factors for P-UGHR.

CONCLUSION

Age ≤10.5 months, bloody stools and symptom duration >17.5 h were independent risk factors for P-UGHR. Caution should be exercised during UGHR in patients aged ≤10.5 months, with bloody stools or symptom duration >17.5 h.

摘要

目的

肠穿孔是超声引导水压灌肠复位(UGHR)的一种主要但尚未研究的并发症。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨小儿肠套叠(P-UGHR)患者行 UGHR 时肠穿孔的危险因素,并确定其临床特征。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2011 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在我院行 UGHR 治疗肠套叠的患者的病历。患者分为 P-UGHR 组和非 P-UGHR 组。采用单因素和多因素 logistic 回归分析 P-UGHR 的危险因素,并确定 P-UGHR 患者的临床特征。

结果

最终分析纳入了 4961 例肠套叠病例。我们发现 15 例患者(男 8 例,占 53.3%;中位年龄 8.73 个月;年龄范围 3-17 个月)发生 P-UGHR。所有 P-UGHR 病例均为结肠穿孔,且套叠肿块远端无坏死。穿孔部位位于升结肠[40%(6/15)]、横结肠[46.7%(7/15)]或降结肠[13.3%(2/15)]。年龄≤10.5 个月[比值比(OR)3.636;90%置信区间(CI)1.274-10.38;P=0.043]、血便(OR 4.189;90%CI 1.352-12.978;P=0.037)和症状持续时间>17.5 小时(OR 0.188;90%CI 0.053-0.666;P=0.03)是 P-UGHR 的独立危险因素。

结论

年龄≤10.5 个月、血便和症状持续时间>17.5 小时是 P-UGHR 的独立危险因素。对于年龄≤10.5 个月、有血便或症状持续时间>17.5 小时的患者,行 UGHR 时应谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b3/11505585/931b7500408c/IANN_A_2417181_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b3/11505585/c89b869150fd/IANN_A_2417181_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b3/11505585/4d9f13ac13f9/IANN_A_2417181_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b3/11505585/931b7500408c/IANN_A_2417181_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b3/11505585/c89b869150fd/IANN_A_2417181_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b3/11505585/4d9f13ac13f9/IANN_A_2417181_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b3/11505585/931b7500408c/IANN_A_2417181_F0003_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors of bowel perforation during hydrostatic enema reduction for paediatric intussusception.肠套叠水压灌肠复位术致肠穿孔的危险因素。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2417181. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2417181. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction versus fluoroscopy-guided air reduction for pediatric intussusception: a multi-center, prospective, cohort study.超声引导水压复位与透视引导气复位治疗小儿肠套叠的多中心前瞻性队列研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00346-9.
3
Air enema reduction versus hydrostatic enema reduction for intussusceptions in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.空气灌肠复位与水压灌肠复位治疗小儿肠套叠的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 18;19(3):e0297985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297985. eCollection 2024.
4
Colon perforation during attempted barium enema reduction of intussusception.在尝试通过钡剂灌肠复位肠套叠过程中发生的结肠穿孔。
J Pediatr Surg. 1981 Jun;16(3):313-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(81)80687-2.
5
Comparative safety and efficacy of balloon use in air enema reduction for pediatric intussusception.球囊在小儿肠套叠空气灌肠复位中应用的安全性和有效性比较
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Sep;48(10):1423-1431. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4156-2. Epub 2018 May 24.
6
Mechanism of perforation occurring in the intussuscipiens during hydrostatic reduction of intussusception.肠套叠水压复位过程中套入部发生穿孔的机制。
Can J Surg. 1982 Sep;25(5):481-3.
7
A comparison of hydrostatic reduction in children with intussusception versus surgery: Single-centre experience.小儿肠套叠水压复位与手术治疗的比较:单中心经验
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2017 Oct-Dec;14(4):61-64. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_102_16.
8
Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction for children with acute intussusception.超声引导下水压灌肠复位术治疗小儿急性肠套叠的有效性和安全性。
Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211040911. doi: 10.1177/00368504211040911.
9
Sonographically guided hydrostatic reduction of childhood intussusception using Hartmann's solution.超声引导下使用哈特曼氏溶液对儿童肠套叠进行水压复位。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Nov;167(5):1237-41. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911188.
10
Risk factors for failure of hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in pediatric patients: A retrospective study.小儿肠套叠水压灌肠复位失败的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(1):e13826. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013826.

本文引用的文献

1
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of the Need for Surgical Treatment in Children's Intussusception.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为儿童肠套叠手术治疗需求的预测指标
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Oct;33(5):422-427. doi: 10.1055/a-1913-4280. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
2
Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction for children with acute intussusception.超声引导下水压灌肠复位术治疗小儿急性肠套叠的有效性和安全性。
Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211040911. doi: 10.1177/00368504211040911.
3
Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction versus fluoroscopy-guided air reduction for pediatric intussusception: a multi-center, prospective, cohort study.
超声引导水压复位与透视引导气复位治疗小儿肠套叠的多中心前瞻性队列研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00346-9.
4
Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review.小儿肠套叠的治疗:系统评价。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Mar;56(3):587-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.055. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients.小儿肠套叠空气灌肠复位与水压灌肠复位的随机试验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Aug;53(8):1464-1468. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
6
Intussusception: past, present and future.肠套叠:过去、现在与未来。
Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Aug;47(9):1101-1108. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3878-x. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
7
Failed Intussusception Reduction in Children: Correlation Between Radiologic, Surgical, and Pathologic Findings.儿童肠套叠复位失败:放射学、手术及病理学检查结果的相关性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Aug;207(2):424-33. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15659. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Enema reduction of intussusception: the success rate of hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction.灌肠复位肠套叠:水压复位和气压复位的成功率。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Dec 15;11:1837-42. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S92169. eCollection 2015.
9
Reduction of intussusception in infants by a pediatric surgical team: improvement in safety and outcome.儿科手术团队对婴儿肠套叠的复位:安全性和治疗效果的改善
Pediatr Surg Int. 2006 Nov;22(11):897-900. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1766-9.
10
Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusceptions by saline enema: a review of 5218 cases in 17 years.超声引导下生理盐水灌肠水压复位治疗肠套叠:17年5218例病例回顾
Am J Surg. 2006 Sep;192(3):273-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.04.013.