Suppr超能文献

两种不同人工晶状体的客观和主观结果比较分析:三焦点和扩展视力范围人工晶状体

Comparative analysis of objective and subjective outcomes of two different intraocular lenses: trifocal and extended range of vision.

作者信息

Pedrotti Emilio, Carones Francesco, Talli Pietro, Bonacci Erika, Selvi Federico, Galzignato Alice, Besutti Andrea, De Gregorio Alessandra, Marchini Giorgio

机构信息

Department of Neurological, Neuropsychological, Morphological and Movement Sciences, Ophthalmology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Carones Ophthalmology Center, Carones Vision, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 14;5(1):e000497. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000497. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate objective and subjective outcomes after bilateral implantation of two different multifocal intraocular lenses, which correct pseudophakic presbyopia in an adequate and homogeneous population court.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Fifty patients were evaluated at 3 months after bilateral implantation, at the Eye Clinic of University of Verona and at the Carones Ophthalmology Center Milano, as follows: Tecnis Symfony (25 patients), Alcon PanOptix (25 patients). Main outcomes were uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and BCVA) at 4 m, 60 cm (best distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (BDCIVA) and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity), 40 cm (best distance corrected near visual acuity (BDCNVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA)), objective refractive outcome, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) cut-off), optical quality (Strehl ratio), aberrometry (root mean square RMS 4 mm), subjective quality of life (National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life score (NEI-RQL-42 score) test).

RESULTS

Symfony and PanOptix showed BCVA and UDVA comparable results. Symfony presented significant better outcomes at BDCIVA (p=0.001), while PanOptix showed better performances at BDCNVA and UNVA (p=0.01). Symfony achieved better results in RMS 4 mm (p=0.024) and in MTF cut-off (p=0.041). In the questionnaire NEI-RQL-42, PanOptix presented better scores in 'near vision' and 'spectacles independence', whereas Symfony in 'symptoms' and 'clarity of vision'.

CONCLUSION

Both intraocular lenses are valid options to avoid pseudophakic presbyopia, even though they present different features which make them unique. Symfony allows patients to achieve a better objective and subjective quality of vision and contrast sensitivity; PanOptix provides better outcomes in near vision and spectacles independence requirements.

摘要

目的

评估在适当且同质的人群中双侧植入两种不同多焦点人工晶状体矫正假晶状体性老视后的客观和主观结果。

方法与分析

在维罗纳大学眼科诊所和米兰卡罗内斯眼科中心,对50例患者在双侧植入后3个月进行了评估,如下:Tecnis Symfony(25例患者)、爱尔康PanOptix(25例患者)。主要结果包括4米、60厘米(最佳矫正中距离视力(BDCIVA)和未矫正中距离视力)、40厘米(最佳矫正近视力(BDCNVA)和未矫正近视力(UNVA))时的未矫正和最佳矫正远视力(UDVA和BCVA)、客观屈光结果、散焦曲线、对比敏感度(调制传递函数(MTF)截止值)、光学质量(斯特列尔比率)、像差测量(4毫米均方根RMS)、主观生活质量(美国国立眼科研究所屈光不正生活质量评分(NEI-RQL-42评分)测试)。

结果

Symfony和PanOptix的BCVA和UDVA结果相当。Symfony在BDCIVA方面表现出显著更好的结果(p = 0.001),而PanOptix在BDCNVA和UNVA方面表现更好(p = 0.01)。Symfony在4毫米均方根(p = 0.024)和MTF截止值(p = 0.041)方面取得了更好的结果。在NEI-RQL-42问卷中,PanOptix在“近视力”和“不依赖眼镜”方面得分更高,而Symfony在“症状”和“视力清晰度”方面得分更高。

结论

两种人工晶状体都是避免假晶状体性老视有效的选择,尽管它们具有不同的特征,使其独具特色。Symfony能让患者获得更好的客观和主观视觉质量以及对比敏感度;PanOptix在近视力和满足摆脱眼镜需求方面提供了更好的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db0/7559032/4b35be869e82/bmjophth-2020-000497f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验