Pasanen Tytti P, Lanki Timo, Siponen Taina, Turunen Anu W, Tiittanen Pekka, Heikinheimo Vuokko, Tiitu Maija, Viinikka Arto, Halonen Jaana I
Department of Public Health, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Tampere, Finland.
Department of Public Health, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland.
J Urban Health. 2024 Dec;101(6):1207-1220. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00927-y. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
Quality of residential area, or neighborhood, is one determinant of overall quality of life and associated with health and health behavior. Ensuring that urban and suburban neighborhoods remain liveable and comfortable to reside in is a challenge amidst growing urbanization. Neighborhood quality has been associated with socio-demographic, dwelling-related, and subjective and objective neighborhood factors. However, only a few studies have additionally included participation in neighborhood decision-making and examined whether these associations are stronger among residents who are more settled in the neighborhood. We examined whether subjectively and objectively measured environmental factors and participation are associated with perception of neighborhood liveability and possible effect moderators. We analyzed survey data collected in 2021 among adults (aged 18-97) living in suburbs and urban centers in five Finnish cities (n = 2057; response rate 34%) with logistic regression models. Almost 80% of the respondents perceived their neighborhood as liveable or very liveable. The following factors were most strongly associated with perceiving the neighborhood as liveable: low area-level socioeconomic deprivation; central urban zone; green view from home; satisfaction with neighborhood safety, green areas, blue areas, and maintenance of traffic routes; and good or very good possibilities to influence decisions regarding the neighborhood. Only a few interactions between indicators of being more settled in the neighborhood (e.g., age group and dwelling ownership) modified these associations. In all, our study suggests that to maintain liveability, urban or community planning should consider local residents' favorable perceptions of safety, recreational areas, and engagement in decision-making.
住宅区或社区的质量是整体生活质量的一个决定因素,与健康及健康行为相关。在城市化进程不断加快的背景下,确保城市和郊区社区保持宜居和舒适是一项挑战。社区质量与社会人口统计学、住房相关以及主观和客观的社区因素有关。然而,只有少数研究额外纳入了社区决策参与情况,并考察了这些关联在社区居住时间更长的居民中是否更强。我们研究了主观和客观衡量的环境因素及参与情况是否与社区宜居性感知以及可能的效应调节因素相关。我们使用逻辑回归模型分析了2021年在芬兰五个城市的郊区和市中心居住的成年人(年龄在18 - 97岁之间)中收集的调查数据(n = 2057;回复率34%)。近80%的受访者认为他们的社区宜居或非常宜居。与认为社区宜居最密切相关的因素如下:低区域层面的社会经济剥夺;城市中心区;家中能看到绿色景观;对社区安全、绿地、蓝色区域以及交通路线维护的满意度;以及对影响社区决策有良好或非常好的可能性。在社区居住时间更长的指标(如年龄组和住房所有权)之间只有少数相互作用改变了这些关联。总之,我们的研究表明,为了维持宜居性,城市或社区规划应考虑当地居民对安全、休闲区域以及决策参与的良好感知。