Adams Tony
Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.
20 Century Br Hist. 2023 May 31;34(2):324-353. doi: 10.1093/tcbh/hwad019.
In the wake of the linguistic turn the 'new political history' has recognized the importance of both political language and social context. In practice, however, over recent years much political history of the pre-1918 period has become increasingly focused on language and party, relegating society and economy to the margins. This study emphasizes the interconnectedness of party politics and society, arguing that smaller municipal electoral districts offer potential new insights into the impact of religion, class, gender and ethnicity upon both, party policy and practice, and voter behaviour. Parties adapted their campaign strategies and policy stances to reflect their understanding of the social make-up of local electorates. Voter responses to party campaigns could be strongly influenced, but not determined, by individual or group perceptions of social standing. By exploring the connected fortunes of all three major parties new light is shed on the development of local political culture before 1914. The article also assesses the shifting strengths and weaknesses of Conservative, Liberal, and Labour parties, and contributes to historiographical debates on the politics of slum and suburban communities, and the pre-war trajectories of the major parties.
随着语言转向,“新政治史”认识到政治语言和社会背景的重要性。然而实际上,近年来,许多关于1918年以前时期的政治史越来越关注语言和政党,将社会和经济边缘化。本研究强调政党政治与社会的相互联系,认为较小的市政选区为宗教、阶级、性别和种族对政党政策与实践以及选民行为的影响提供了潜在的新见解。政党调整其竞选策略和政策立场,以反映他们对当地选民社会构成的理解。选民对政党竞选活动的反应可能会受到个人或群体社会地位认知的强烈影响,但并非由其决定。通过探究所有三个主要政党的兴衰,1914年以前地方政治文化的发展得以呈现新的面貌。本文还评估了保守党、自由党和工党不断变化的优势与劣势,并为关于贫民窟和郊区社区政治以及主要政党战前发展轨迹的史学辩论做出了贡献。