Arslan Ersan, Kilit Bulent, Clemente Filipe Manuel, Soylu Yusuf, Sögüt Mustafa, Badicu Georgian, Akca Firat, Gokkaya Mine, Murawska-Ciałowicz Eugenia
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat 60250, Turkey.
School of Physical Education and Sports, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag 59030, Turkey.
Biology (Basel). 2021 Nov 15;10(11):1180. doi: 10.3390/biology10111180.
This study aimed to compare the order effects of combined small-sided games (SSGs) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on the psychophysiological responses and physical and technical performances of young soccer players. Twenty-four soccer players (aged 14.63 ± 0.71 years) were randomly divided into SSGs + HIIT ( = 12) and HIIT + SSGs ( = 12) for 6 weeks. The SSGs consisted of two 4-16 min rounds of 2, 3, and four-a-side games with 2 min of passive resting, whereas the HIIT consisted of 6-10 min of high-intensity runs at varying intensities (from 90 to 100%). Pre-test and post-test elements included a 5-30 m sprint test, countermovement jump test, zigzag agility test with the ball and without the ball, repeated sprint ability test, speed dribbling ability test, three-corner run test, and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test level 1. Both combined training interventions produced similar improvements in physical performance and technical responses ( ≥ 0.05, values ranging from 0.40 to 1.10). However, the combined HIIT + SSGs training produced meaningfully lower perceived exertion ( = 0.00, = 2.98) and greater physical enjoyment ( = 0.00, = 4.28) compared with the SSGs + HIIT intervention. Furthermore, the SSGs + HIIT group showed a higher training load than those from the HIIT + SSGs group for all weeks ( ≤ 0.05, values ranging from 1.36 to 2.05). The present study's results might be used by coaches and practitioners to design training programmes for youth soccer players.
本研究旨在比较组合式小场地比赛(SSGs)和高强度间歇训练(HIIT)的顺序效应对年轻足球运动员心理生理反应以及身体和技术表现的影响。24名足球运动员(年龄14.63±0.71岁)被随机分为SSGs+HIIT组(n = 12)和HIIT+SSGs组(n = 12),为期6周。SSGs包括两轮4至16分钟的2人、3人及4人制比赛,中间有2分钟的被动休息,而HIIT包括6至10分钟不同强度(90%至100%)的高强度跑步。测试前和测试后的项目包括5至30米短跑测试、纵跳测试、带球和不带球的之字形敏捷性测试、反复冲刺能力测试、快速运球能力测试、三角跑测试以及Yo-Yo间歇恢复测试1级。两种组合训练干预在身体表现和技术反应方面均产生了相似的改善(p≥0.05,效应值范围为0.40至1.10)。然而,与SSGs+HIIT干预相比,HIIT+SSGs组合训练产生的主观用力感觉显著更低(p = 0.00,d = 2.98),身体愉悦感更强(p = 0.00,d = 4.28)。此外,在所有周次中,SSGs+HIIT组的训练负荷均高于HIIT+SSGs组(p≤0.05,效应值范围为1.36至2.05)。本研究结果可供教练和从业者用于为青少年足球运动员设计训练计划。