O'Connor Fergus K, Meade Robert D, Notley Sean R, Ioannou Leonidas G, Flouris Andreas D, Kenny Glen P
Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Automatics, Biocybernetics and Robotics, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2024 Dec;21(12):869-877. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2024.2406227. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
While monitoring physiological strain is recommended to safeguard workers during heat exposure, it is logistically challenging. The perceptual strain index (PeSI) is a subjective estimate thought to reflect the physiological strain index (PSI) that requires no direct monitoring. However, advanced age and chronic diseases (hypertension/type 2 diabetes [T2D]) influence the perception of heat stress, potentially limiting the utility of the PeSI. We therefore assessed whether the relation and agreement between the PeSI and PSI during simulated work in various environmental conditions is modified by age and T2D/hypertension. Thirteen young adults and 37 older adults without ( = 14) and with T2D ( = 10) or hypertension ( = 13) walked on a treadmill (∼200 W/m) for 180 min or until termination (volitional fatigue, rectal temperature ≥39.5 °C) in 16, 24, 28, and 32 °C wet-bulb globe temperatures. Rectal temperature and heart rate were recorded to calculate PSI (0-10 scale). Rating of perceived exertion and thermal sensation were recorded to calculate PeSI (0-10 scale). The relation between hourly PSI and PeSI was assessed via linear mixed models. Mean bias (95% limits of agreement [LoA]) between PSI and PeSI was assessed via Bland-Altman analysis. PSI increased with PeSI ( < 0.001), but the slope of this relation was not different between young and older adults ( = 0.189) or as a function of chronic disease (within older adults; = 0.183). The mean bias between PSI and PeSI was small (0.02), but the 95% LoA was wide (-3.3-3.4). Together, a linear relation between PeSI and PSI was observed but agreement between these measures varied considerably across individuals and thus PeSI should not be used as a surrogate marker of PSI. Caution should be taken when utilizing the PeSI to estimate physiological strain on workers.
虽然建议在热暴露期间监测生理应激以保护工人,但在实际操作中具有挑战性。感知应激指数(PeSI)是一种主观估计,被认为可以反映无需直接监测的生理应激指数(PSI)。然而,高龄和慢性疾病(高血压/2型糖尿病 [T2D])会影响对热应激的感知,这可能会限制PeSI的效用。因此,我们评估了在各种环境条件下模拟工作期间,年龄以及T2D/高血压是否会改变PeSI与PSI之间的关系和一致性。13名年轻人和37名老年人,其中无T2D(n = 14)、有T2D(n = 10)或高血压(n = 13),在湿球黑球温度分别为16、24、28和32°C的环境中,在跑步机上以约200 W/m的功率行走180分钟或直至终止(自愿疲劳,直肠温度≥39.5°C)。记录直肠温度和心率以计算PSI(0至10分制)。记录主观用力程度和热感觉评分以计算PeSI(0至10分制)。通过线性混合模型评估每小时PSI与PeSI之间的关系。通过Bland-Altman分析评估PSI与PeSI之间的平均偏差(95%一致性界限 [LoA])。PSI随PeSI升高(P < 0.001),但年轻人和老年人之间这种关系的斜率无差异(P = 0.189),在老年人中也不随慢性病情况而变化(P = 0.183)。PSI与PeSI之间的平均偏差较小(0.02),但95% LoA较宽(-3.3至3.4)。总体而言,观察到PeSI与PSI之间存在线性关系,但这些测量值之间的一致性在个体间差异很大,因此PeSI不应用作PSI的替代指标。在利用PeSI估计工人的生理应激时应谨慎。