Suppr超能文献

加权毛毯在精神障碍患者症状管理中的安全性和有效性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Safety and effectiveness of weighted blankets for symptom management in patients with mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.

Psychotherapy Department, Zhengzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450052, China.

出版信息

Complement Ther Med. 2024 Dec;87:103104. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103104. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current practice guideline regarding treatment for insomnia and sleep disturbances among children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been published and it suggests that the use of weighted blankets might not be an evidence-informed practice. However, limited guidance and evidence synthesis exist on the overall effectiveness of a weighted blanket for symptom management among patients with mental disorders, although it has been routinely recommended and prescribed for this population in many mental health care settings.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate and synthesize existing data on the safety and effectiveness of weighted blankets for symptom management among patients with mental disorders.

METHODS

Comprehensive retrieval of published, unpublished, or ongoing studies was carried out across a series of bibliographic databases, grey literature sources, and clinical trial registry platforms, along with manual screening of the reference lists of the included studies or relevant reviews. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared a weighted blanket intervention and a control condition among patients with mental disorders. Two reviewers independently extracted the data using a pre-specified form and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies with the revised Cochrane 'Risk of Bias' (RoB 2) tool. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis when possible. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses, where appropriate, were conducted to explore the robustness of the pooled effect estimates.

RESULTS

Eight studies involving a total of 426 patients were included in this review. Half of the included studies were rated as having a high risk of bias, primarily due to the failure to blind participants for participant-reported measures. No serious adverse events were reported with the application of weighted blankets. The meta-analysis of five studies revealed that the use of weighted blankets induced a small magnitude decrease (standardized mean difference within studies [SMD]= 0.40) in anxiety management. The pooled estimate of three studies reporting the effect of weighted blankets on insomnia revealed a nonsignificant difference between the two groups (mean difference [MD] = -1.92, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = -3.92-0.09, p = 0.06). However, the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis of the two remaining homogeneous studies revealed that patients who used weighted blankets had reduced insomnia severity index (ISI) scores (MD = -2.78, 95 % CI = -4.44 to -1.12, p = 0.001). Additionally, a study without available data for inclusion in the meta-analysis also reported a positive effect in reducing the ISI score. Due to the heterogeneity across studies, summary estimates for the effects of weighted blankets on fatigue and depression were not computed. However, primary studies reporting these two outcomes demonstrated that the application of weighted blankets had a positive effect.

CONCLUSION

Weighted blankets may be a safe and effective add-on treatment for managing common symptoms such as anxiety, insomnia, depression, and fatigue among psychiatric patients. However, these results need to be further confirmed due to the limited number of studies included in this review, the small sample size and the significant heterogeneity across these primary studies. To gain a better understanding of the effect and mechanism of weight blankets, future trials should preferably integrate more objective measures.

摘要

背景

目前针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童和青少年的失眠和睡眠障碍治疗的实践指南已经发布,该指南建议使用加重毛毯可能不是一种基于证据的实践。然而,尽管在许多心理健康护理环境中,它已被常规推荐和开给该人群,但对于加重毛毯在精神障碍患者症状管理中的总体有效性,仍存在有限的指导和证据综合。

目的

系统评估和综合现有关于加重毛毯在精神障碍患者症状管理中的安全性和有效性的数据。

方法

通过一系列文献数据库、灰色文献来源和临床试验注册平台全面检索已发表、未发表或正在进行的研究,并手动筛选纳入研究或相关综述的参考文献列表。如果研究比较了加重毛毯干预和精神障碍患者的对照条件,则纳入随机对照试验(RCT)。两位评审员使用预先指定的表格独立提取数据,并使用修订后的 Cochrane“风险偏倚”(RoB 2)工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。当可能时,使用 Review Manager(RevMan)5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。进行亚组和敏感性分析,以探索汇总效应估计的稳健性。

结果

本综述共纳入了 8 项研究,总计 426 名患者。纳入研究中有一半被评为高偏倚风险,主要是由于未能对参与者报告的措施进行盲法。使用加重毛毯没有报告严重不良事件。五项研究的荟萃分析显示,使用加重毛毯可使焦虑管理的幅度略有降低(研究内标准化均数差 [SMD] = 0.40)。三项研究报告的加重毛毯对失眠影响的汇总估计值显示两组之间无显著差异(平均差 [MD] = -1.92,95%置信区间 [CI] = -3.92-0.09,p = 0.06)。然而,对两项剩余同质研究的逐一剔除敏感性分析显示,使用加重毛毯的患者失眠严重程度指数(ISI)评分降低(MD = -2.78,95%CI = -4.44 至 -1.12,p = 0.001)。此外,一项未提供可纳入荟萃分析数据的研究也报告了降低 ISI 评分的积极效果。由于研究间存在异质性,因此未计算加重毛毯对疲劳和抑郁影响的汇总估计值。然而,报告这两个结局的主要研究表明,应用加重毛毯具有积极的效果。

结论

加重毛毯可能是管理精神障碍患者常见症状(如焦虑、失眠、抑郁和疲劳)的一种安全有效的附加治疗方法。然而,由于本综述纳入的研究数量有限,样本量小,这些主要研究之间存在显著异质性,因此这些结果需要进一步证实。为了更好地了解加重毛毯的效果和机制,未来的试验最好纳入更多的客观测量指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验