Cruz Murilo Henrique, Normando David, Mendonça Marcos Rogério de, Peixoto Soares Ueno Eloísa, Neto José Rino, Paiva João Batista de
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil.
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Oct 24. doi: 10.1007/s00056-024-00557-8.
To analyze the effects of the time span between archwire changes on the amount of transverse dental arch expansion. The design was a prospective, controlled clinical trial. Randomization was performed by computer-generated allocation tables.
In all, 35 patients were evaluated in three groups treated with fixed appliances and the same four sequential leveling archwires, however, with different replacement periods: 28 days (4-week [4W] group), 56 days (8-week [8W] group), and 84 days (12-week [12W] group). Digital models were measured before the treatment (T0) and at the end of the evaluation period (T1) by a blinded operator with OrthoAnalyzer® software (3-Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and compared using MANOVA. A multiple linear regression was also used to evaluate the influences of age, initial dental crowding, incisor inclination, and facial pattern on the amount of expansion.
Mean expansion was 2.77 ± 0.84 mm (upper arch) and 3.12 ± 0.88 mm (lower arch) in the 12W group; 1.96 ± 0.82 mm and 2.27 ± 0.96 mm in the 8W group, and 1.11 ± 0.93 mm and 1.32 ± 0.91 mm in the 4W group, respectively for the upper and lower arches. The amount of expansion varied significantly between the groups in the area of the canines, first premolars, and second premolars for both arches. Expansion was less in older patients. Initial dental crowding, incisor inclination and facial pattern had no influence on dental expansion.
Longer time spans between archwire changes provided greater amounts of expansion, while age is inversely related, with younger patients expressing greater amounts of expansion. The results also suggest that the expansion provided by the fixed appliances is expressed mainly in the canine and premolar areas.
分析弓丝更换时间间隔对牙弓横向扩展量的影响。本研究设计为一项前瞻性对照临床试验。通过计算机生成的分配表进行随机分组。
总共35例患者被分为三组,均采用固定矫治器和相同的四根序贯整平弓丝进行治疗,但弓丝更换周期不同:28天(4周[4W]组)、56天(8周[8W]组)和84天(12周[12W]组)。在治疗前(T0)和评估期末(T1),由一名盲法操作人员使用OrthoAnalyzer®软件(丹麦哥本哈根3-Shape公司)对数字化模型进行测量,并采用多变量方差分析进行比较。还使用多元线性回归来评估年龄、初始牙列拥挤度、切牙倾斜度和面部类型对扩展量的影响。
12W组上牙弓平均扩展量为2.77±0.84mm,下牙弓为3.12±0.88mm;8W组上牙弓为1.96±0.82mm,下牙弓为2.27±0.96mm;4W组上牙弓为1.11±0.93mm,下牙弓为1.32±0.91mm。在两个牙弓的尖牙、第一前磨牙和第二前磨牙区域,各组间的扩展量差异显著。年龄较大的患者扩展量较小。初始牙列拥挤度、切牙倾斜度和面部类型对牙弓扩展无影响。
弓丝更换的时间间隔越长,扩展量越大,而年龄与之呈负相关,年龄较小的患者扩展量更大。结果还表明,固定矫治器产生的扩展主要表现在尖牙和前磨牙区域。