• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较宗教在非洲和亚太地区对新冠疫苗认知中的作用。

Comparing role of religion in perception of the COVID-19 vaccines in Africa and Asia Pacific.

作者信息

Jin Shihui, Cook Alex R, Kanwagi Robert, Larson Heidi J, Lin Leesa

机构信息

Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Statistics and Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Oct 24;4(1):212. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00628-2.

DOI:10.1038/s43856-024-00628-2
PMID:39448706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11502740/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the midst of the global COVID-19 vaccine distribution challenge, religion stands out as a key determinant of vaccine hesitancy and health choices. Notably, the multifaceted religious environments of Africa and the Asia Pacific remain under-researched in this context.

METHODS

Utilizing data from two survey waves conducted between 2021 and 2022, this cross-sectional study investigated the effects of religious beliefs on perceptions of compatibility between religion and vaccines and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Africa and Asia Pacific. Logistic regression models were employed, with interaction terms between socio-economic factors incorporated to account for variations among diverse subpopulations.

RESULTS

Among the eight religious groups identified, Atheists and Buddhists in the Asia Pacific exhibit the lowest agreement, with fewer than 60% acknowledging the religious compatibility of vaccines. Willingness to accept vaccines, however, is consistently higher in Asia Pacific by at least four percentage points compared to Africa, with the disparity widening further in the second wave. Impacts of education on vaccine perceptions vary across religious groups, while acknowledging vaccine compatibility with religion positively contributed to vaccine acceptance. Dynamics between region, religion, and other socio-demographic factors have changed substantially over time. All but Atheists and Muslims exhibit a higher propensity to endorse vaccines during Survey Wave 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals complex, context-dependent connections between vaccine attitudes and religion and the heterogeneous effects of time and education among different religious affiliations. Understanding the underlying drivers of these temporal variations helps inform tailored approaches aimed at addressing vaccine hesitancy, promoting vaccine uptake, and improving the well-being of each religious group.

摘要

背景

在全球新冠疫苗分配面临挑战的背景下,宗教成为疫苗犹豫和健康选择的关键决定因素。值得注意的是,非洲和亚太地区多层面的宗教环境在这方面的研究仍显不足。

方法

本横断面研究利用2021年至2022年两轮调查的数据,探究宗教信仰对非洲和亚太地区宗教与疫苗兼容性认知以及新冠疫苗接受度的影响。采用逻辑回归模型,并纳入社会经济因素之间的交互项,以解释不同亚群体之间的差异。

结果

在确定的八个宗教群体中,亚太地区的无神论者和佛教徒认同度最低,不到60%的人认可疫苗与宗教的兼容性。然而,亚太地区接受疫苗的意愿始终比非洲至少高四个百分点,在第二轮调查中差距进一步扩大。教育对疫苗认知的影响因宗教群体而异,而认可疫苗与宗教的兼容性对疫苗接受度有积极贡献。随着时间的推移,地区、宗教和其他社会人口因素之间的动态关系发生了很大变化。除无神论者和穆斯林外,所有群体在第二轮调查中认可疫苗的倾向都更高。

结论

我们的研究揭示了疫苗态度与宗教之间复杂的、依赖于具体情境的联系,以及不同宗教信仰中时间和教育的异质影响。了解这些时间变化的潜在驱动因素有助于制定针对性的方法,以解决疫苗犹豫问题,促进疫苗接种,并改善每个宗教群体的福祉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/8770a642dd9f/43856_2024_628_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/e97136a9e521/43856_2024_628_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/8622b38d2628/43856_2024_628_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/1e5806fb5358/43856_2024_628_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/068c6a030bed/43856_2024_628_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/8770a642dd9f/43856_2024_628_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/e97136a9e521/43856_2024_628_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/8622b38d2628/43856_2024_628_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/1e5806fb5358/43856_2024_628_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/068c6a030bed/43856_2024_628_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d78/11502740/8770a642dd9f/43856_2024_628_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing role of religion in perception of the COVID-19 vaccines in Africa and Asia Pacific.比较宗教在非洲和亚太地区对新冠疫苗认知中的作用。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Oct 24;4(1):212. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00628-2.
2
Faith and vaccination: a scoping review of the relationships between religious beliefs and vaccine hesitancy.信仰与疫苗接种:宗教信仰与疫苗犹豫之间关系的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 6;24(1):1806. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18873-4.
3
Socioeconomic determinants and reasons for non-acceptance to vaccination recommendations during the 3 - 5 waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary.匈牙利 COVID-19 大流行的 3-5 波期间,疫苗接种建议的社会经济决定因素和不接受原因。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):1796. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19267-2.
4
The role of religion and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in England.宗教和 COVID-19 疫苗接种在英国的作用。
Vaccine. 2024 May 10;42(13):3215-3219. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
5
Self-Reported COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Acceptance and Hesitancy Among Autistic Adults in Pennsylvania: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Survey Data.宾夕法尼亚州自闭症成年人自我报告的新冠疫苗及加强针接种接受度与犹豫情况:调查数据的横断面分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 28;10:e51054. doi: 10.2196/51054.
6
Exploring the beliefs and experiences with regard to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance in a slum of Karachi, Pakistan.探讨巴基斯坦卡拉奇贫民窟居民对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫和接受的信念和经验。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Dec 1;37(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac140.
7
Adult smokers' perception of the role of religion and religious leadership on smoking and association with quitting: a comparison between Thai Buddhists and Malaysian Muslims.成年吸烟者对宗教及宗教领袖在吸烟与戒烟方面所起作用的认知:泰国佛教徒与马来西亚穆斯林的比较
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Oct;69(7):1025-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.042. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
8
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among healthcare workers in South Africa.南非医护人员对 COVID-19 疫苗的接受度和犹豫。
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Apr;21(4):549-559. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2023355. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
Longitudinal changes in COVID-19 vaccination intent among South African adults: evidence from the NIDS-CRAM panel survey, February to May 2021.2021 年 2 月至 5 月南非成年人中 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿的纵向变化:来自 NIDS-CRAM 面板调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 2;22(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12826-5.
10
Spillover of Vaccine Hesitancy into Adult COVID-19 and Influenza: The Role of Race, Religion, and Political Affiliation in the United States.疫苗犹豫向成人 COVID-19 和流感的溢出:美国种族、宗教和政治信仰的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043376.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaccination strategies to achieve outbreak control for MPXV Clade I with a one-time mass campaign in sub-Saharan Africa: A scenario-based modelling study.在撒哈拉以南非洲通过一次性大规模接种运动实现对MPXV进化枝I疫情控制的疫苗接种策略:一项基于情景的建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2025 Sep 5;22(9):e1004726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004726. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Various Segments of the Population in Turkey: A Literature Review.土耳其不同人群对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:文献综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jan 7;13(1):44. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13010044.
3
Vaccination Education Deficits and Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Students in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infections, hospitalisations, and mortality in adults: findings from a rapid living systematic evidence synthesis and meta-analysis up to December, 2022.COVID-19 疫苗对成年人感染、住院和死亡的长期有效性:截至 2022 年 12 月快速实时系统证据综合和荟萃分析的结果。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 May;11(5):439-452. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00015-2. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
A survey of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance across 23 countries in 2022.2022年对23个国家新冠疫苗接受情况的调查。
Nat Med. 2023 Feb;29(2):366-375. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02185-4. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
3
日本医学生的疫苗接种教育缺陷与疫苗犹豫:一项横断面研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Nov 22;12(12):1310. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12121310.
Global state of education-related inequality in COVID-19 vaccine coverage, structural barriers, vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine refusal: findings from the Global COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey.
全球 COVID-19 趋势和影响调查:新冠疫苗覆盖、结构性障碍、疫苗犹豫和疫苗拒绝方面与教育相关的不平等的全球状况。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Feb;11(2):e207-e217. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00520-4. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
4
Defining and measuring vaccine hesitancy.定义和测量疫苗犹豫。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Dec;6(12):1609-1610. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01484-7.
5
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and its socio-demographic and emotional determinants: A multi-country cross-sectional study.COVID-19 疫苗接受度及其社会人口学和情绪决定因素:一项多国家横断面研究。
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 9;41(2):354-364. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.051. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
6
COVID-19 Vaccination Willingness in Four Asian Countries: A Comparative Study including Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam.COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿在四个亚洲国家:包括泰国、印度尼西亚、菲律宾和越南的比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912284.
7
A comprehensive examination of association between belief in vaccine misinformation and vaccination intention in the COVID-19 context.在 COVID-19 背景下,对疫苗错误信息信念与接种意愿之间的关联进行全面考察。
J Health Commun. 2022 Jul 3;27(7):495-509. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2130479. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
8
Characterising reasons for reversals of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among Japanese people: One-year follow-up survey.剖析日本民众新冠疫苗接种犹豫态度转变的原因:一年期随访调查
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Oct;27:100541. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100541. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
9
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Malaysia: Exploring factors and identifying highly vulnerable groups.马来西亚对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:探索因素和确定高度脆弱群体。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0270868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270868. eCollection 2022.
10
Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study.全球首例 COVID-19 疫苗接种一年的影响:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;22(9):1293-1302. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00320-6. Epub 2022 Jun 23.