Suppr超能文献

Q235钢对接焊接接头的破坏性与非破坏性断裂韧性测量比较

Comparison of destructive and non-destructive fracture toughness measurements for Q235 steel butt-welded joint.

作者信息

Li Yao, Jiang Tong, Li Ling, Lu Pengmin, Li Datao, Wang Binhua, Chen Guozhang, Hou Yulong

机构信息

School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, 710055, Shaanxi, China.

Key Laboratory of Road Construction Technology and Equipment, Ministry of Education School of Construction Machinery, Chang'an University, Shaanxi, 710064, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 24;14(1):25218. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76687-1.

Abstract

As a critical component of a welded structure, the integrity of the welded joint significantly affects the safety and reliability of the structure in service. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the integrity of welded joints. However, given the harshness of standard measurements renders them unsuitable for application to small volume zones, welded structures or in-service structures. In this study, the fracture properties of a Q235 steel butt-welded joint was evaluated by boundary effect modelling (BEM) method and the ball indentation (BI) method. The results demonstrate that the fracture toughness distribution obtained by the two methods are consistent, with the highest fracture toughness in the weld metal, followed by the heat-affected zone and the base metal, and the lowest fracture toughness in the fusion zone, which is in agreement with the results of the metallographic testing. Furthermore, the relative errors of the zones obtained by the ball indentation method and the boundary effect modelling method ranging from 10.16 to 19.05%, which indicates safety margin ought to be considered for employing the BI method to determine fracture properties of in-service structures.

摘要

作为焊接结构的关键组成部分,焊接接头的完整性显著影响结构在服役期间的安全性和可靠性。因此,研究焊接接头的完整性至关重要。然而,鉴于标准测量的严苛性使其不适用于小体积区域、焊接结构或在用结构。在本研究中,采用边界效应建模(BEM)方法和球形压痕(BI)方法对Q235钢对接焊接接头的断裂性能进行了评估。结果表明,两种方法获得的断裂韧性分布一致,焊缝金属中的断裂韧性最高,其次是热影响区和母材,熔合区的断裂韧性最低,这与金相测试结果一致。此外,球形压痕法和边界效应建模法获得的区域相对误差在10.16%至19.05%之间,这表明在使用BI方法确定在用结构的断裂性能时应考虑安全裕度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbfc/11502882/dedaf57f369a/41598_2024_76687_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验