Bechtel William
Department of Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
J Biol Rhythms. 2024 Dec;39(6):513-534. doi: 10.1177/07487304241286573. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
Mammalian circadian biologists commonly characterize the relation between circadian clocks as hierarchical, with the clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus at the top of the hierarchy. The lineage of research since the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was first identified as in mammals has challenged this perspective, revealing clocks in peripheral tissues, showing that they respond to their own zeitgebers, coordinate oscillations among themselves, and in some cases modify the behavior of the SCN. Increasingly circadian timekeepers appear to constitute a heterarchical network, with control distributed and operating along multiple pathways. One reason for the continued invocation of hierarchy in mammalian circadian biology is that it is difficult to understand how a heterarchical system could operate effectively so as to maintain the organism. Evolved mechanisms, however, need not respect hierarchy and those that have survived have demonstrated the ability of heterarchical organizaton to maintain organisms.
哺乳动物生物钟学家通常将生物钟之间的关系描述为层级式的,视交叉上核中的生物钟处于层级顶端。自从视交叉上核(SCN)首次在哺乳动物中被确定以来的一系列研究对这一观点提出了挑战,揭示了外周组织中的生物钟,表明它们对自身的授时因子作出反应,相互协调振荡,并且在某些情况下会改变视交叉上核的行为。越来越多的生物钟似乎构成了一个异层级网络,其控制沿着多条途径分布并运行。在哺乳动物生物钟生物学中持续援引层级关系的一个原因是,很难理解一个异层级系统如何能够有效地运作以维持生物体。然而,进化机制不一定遵循层级关系,那些留存下来的机制已经证明了异层级组织维持生物体的能力。