Costello Damien, Daly Ed, Ryan Lisa
Department of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, School of Science and Computing, Atlantic Technological University, H91 T8NW Galway, Ireland.
Irish Concussion Research Centre (ICRC), Atlantic Technological University, H91 T8NW Galway, Ireland.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Sep 26;9(4):177. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040177.
Injury prevention/reduction strategies are driven by data collected through injury surveillance systems. The aim of this review was to describe injury surveillance systems that are used for ongoing surveillance in either a professional or amateur sporting environment. This was an update to a review done in 2015 to determine the gaps in injury surveillance. A systematic search process of five databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS and ProQuest) was used to discover published research that presented methodological data about the injury surveillance systems implemented by clubs and organisations for ongoing surveillance. Inclusion criteria centred on the population under surveillance and the ongoing nature of that activity. Data extracted and summarised included the level of athlete under surveillance, the data collection mechanism and the personnel involved, the injury definitions applied and the date and country of origin to provide a comprehensive picture of the systems. A total of 21 systems were documented as being used in ongoing injury surveillance, with 57% of these exclusively in the professional/elite landscapes and 33% at the amateur level. Surveillance systems cater for one sport per athlete entry so there is a gap in research for multi-sport athletes at the amateur level, especially where there is no early specialisation in a multi-sport participation environment. Research in this area will lead to a better understanding of subsequent injury risk for multi-sport athletes who have a higher athlete exposure than single-sport athletes.
伤害预防/减少策略是由通过伤害监测系统收集的数据驱动的。本综述的目的是描述用于职业或业余体育环境中持续监测的伤害监测系统。这是对2015年进行的一项综述的更新,以确定伤害监测方面的差距。使用五个数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、SCOPUS和ProQuest)进行系统检索,以发现已发表的研究,这些研究提供了关于俱乐部和组织为持续监测而实施的伤害监测系统的方法学数据。纳入标准集中在受监测人群和该活动的持续性。提取和总结的数据包括受监测运动员的水平、数据收集机制和相关人员、适用的伤害定义以及起源日期和国家,以全面了解这些系统。共有21个系统被记录用于持续的伤害监测,其中57%仅用于职业/精英领域,33%用于业余水平。监测系统为每个运动员条目针对一项运动,因此在业余水平上对多项目运动员的研究存在空白,特别是在多项目参与环境中没有早期专项化的情况下。该领域的研究将有助于更好地理解多项目运动员后续的伤害风险,他们比单项运动运动员有更高的运动员暴露率。