• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Continuous Catheter Techniques Versus Single-Injection Nerve Blocks: A Comprehensive Review of Postoperative Pain Management Strategies.连续导管技术与单次注射神经阻滞:术后疼痛管理策略的全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e70040. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70040. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Combined Popliteal Catheter With Single-Injection vs Continuous-Infusion Saphenous Nerve Block for Foot and Ankle Surgery.腘窝联合导管单次注射与连续输注隐神经阻滞用于足踝手术的比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Mar;39(3):332-337. doi: 10.1177/1071100717744331. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
3
Effectiveness of ondansetron as an adjunct to lidocaine intravenous regional anesthesia on tourniquet pain and postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective hand surgery: a systematic review protocol.昂丹司琼作为利多卡因静脉区域麻醉辅助药物对择期手部手术患者止血带疼痛和术后疼痛的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):27-38. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1768.
4
[Perioperative analgesia with continuous peripheral nerve blocks in children].[儿童围手术期连续外周神经阻滞镇痛]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007 Feb;26(2):136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2006.10.016. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
5
The catheter-over-needle assembly facilitates delivery of a second local anesthetic bolus to prolong supraclavicular brachial plexus block without time-consuming catheterization steps: a randomized controlled study.导管针组件有助于递送第二剂局部麻醉剂以延长锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的时间,而无需耗时的导管插入步骤:一项随机对照研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;60(7):692-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9951-5. Epub 2013 May 1.
6
Continuous femoral versus posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks for analgesia after hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study.连续股神经阻滞与后路腰丛神经阻滞用于髋关节置换术后镇痛的随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):897-903. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318212495b. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
7
Role of Adjuvants in Enhancing the Efficacy and Duration of Anesthesia Blocks: A Comprehensive Review.佐剂在增强麻醉阻滞效果和持续时间中的作用:一项综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 21;16(9):e69880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69880. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: a review of the published evidence.连续外周神经阻滞:已发表证据的综述。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):904-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182285e01. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
9
Complication rates and efficacy of single-injection vs. continuous interscalene nerve block: a prospective evaluation following arthroscopic primary rotator cuff repair without a concomitant open procedure.单次注射与连续肌间沟神经阻滞的并发症发生率及疗效:对无同期开放手术的关节镜下原发性肩袖修复术后的前瞻性评估。
JSES Int. 2023 Nov 18;8(2):282-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.10.008. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Ultrasound-guided, continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block in minimally invasive thoracic surgery-comparing programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) vs continuous infusion on quality of recovery and postoperative respiratory function: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial.超声引导下连续竖脊肌平面阻滞在微创胸科手术中的应用——比较程控间歇推注(PIB)与连续输注对恢复质量和术后呼吸功能的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Trials. 2022 Sep 21;23(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06726-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Multiple Trauma Care: Current Evidence and Clinical Challenges.将周围神经阻滞整合到多发伤救治中:当前证据与临床挑战
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 7;14(15):5598. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155598.

本文引用的文献

1
Innovative Applications of Telemedicine and Other Digital Health Solutions in Pain Management: A Literature Review.远程医疗及其他数字健康解决方案在疼痛管理中的创新应用:一项文献综述
Pain Ther. 2024 Aug;13(4):791-812. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00620-7. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
2
Revitalizing Postoperative Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery via Inter-departmental Collaboration Toward Precision Medicine: A Narrative Review.通过跨部门协作迈向精准医学,优化术后加速康复中的术后疼痛管理:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Apr 25;16(4):e59031. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59031. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Design and development of patient health tracking, monitoring and big data storage using Internet of Things and real time cloud computing.利用物联网和实时云计算进行患者健康跟踪、监测及大数据存储的设计与开发。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0298582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298582. eCollection 2024.
4
Challenges and Solutions in Postoperative Complications: A Narrative Review in General Surgery.术后并发症的挑战与解决方案:普通外科的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2023 Dec 22;15(12):e50942. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50942. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Neurological Complications of Local Anesthesia in Dentistry: A Review.牙科局部麻醉的神经并发症:综述
Cureus. 2023 Dec 19;15(12):e50790. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50790. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Patients' satisfaction with post-operative pain management in Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.患者对埃塞俄比亚 Ayder 综合专科医院术后疼痛管理的满意度:一项横断面研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Jun 21;45:94. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.94.22563. eCollection 2023.
7
A Comprehensive Review on the Efficacy of Nerve Blocks in Reducing Postoperative Anesthetic and Analgesic Requirements.神经阻滞在降低术后麻醉和镇痛需求方面疗效的综合综述
Cureus. 2023 May 4;15(5):e38552. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38552. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Unanticipated costs associated with interscalene nerve catheters for shoulder surgery.与肩手术相关的肌间沟神经导管的意外费用。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6S):S118-S122. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
9
Using artificial intelligence to improve pain assessment and pain management: a scoping review.利用人工智能改善疼痛评估和管理:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Feb 16;30(3):570-587. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac231.
10
Analgesic benefits of single-shot versus continuous adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.全膝关节置换术中单次注射与持续股内收肌管阻滞的镇痛效果:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Feb;48(2):49-60. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103756. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

连续导管技术与单次注射神经阻滞:术后疼痛管理策略的全面综述

Continuous Catheter Techniques Versus Single-Injection Nerve Blocks: A Comprehensive Review of Postoperative Pain Management Strategies.

作者信息

Singhal Akansha, Taksande Karuna

机构信息

Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e70040. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70040. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.70040
PMID:39449957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11501424/
Abstract

Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for optimizing patient recovery and enhancing surgical outcomes. This review compares two prominent regional anesthesia techniques, continuous catheter techniques and single-injection nerve blocks, focusing on their efficacy, safety, and impact on patient outcomes. Single-injection nerve blocks involve administering a one-time anesthetic dose to a specific nerve or plexus, offering immediate but transient pain relief. In contrast, continuous catheter techniques utilize a catheter to deliver a continuous infusion of anesthetic, providing extended analgesia. The review synthesizes current evidence on the effectiveness of each method, highlighting that single-injection blocks are advantageous for their simplicity and rapid onset but may require supplementary pain management for longer procedures. Continuous catheter techniques, while offering prolonged pain relief, carry risks such as infection and catheter displacement. The comparative analysis of these techniques reveals that both have distinct roles in postoperative care, with choice depending on the surgical procedure and patient needs. Patient satisfaction, recovery times, and overall outcomes are critical factors in determining the optimal pain management strategy. Future research should focus on refining these techniques and exploring innovations to improve patient care and pain management outcomes. This review provides insights for clinicians to make informed decisions about postoperative pain management to enhance patient comfort and recovery.

摘要

有效的术后疼痛管理对于优化患者康复和提高手术效果至关重要。本综述比较了两种主要的区域麻醉技术,即连续导管技术和单次注射神经阻滞,重点关注它们的疗效、安全性以及对患者预后的影响。单次注射神经阻滞是向特定神经或神经丛一次性给予麻醉剂量,可立即缓解疼痛,但持续时间短暂。相比之下,连续导管技术利用导管持续输注麻醉剂,提供延长的镇痛效果。该综述综合了关于每种方法有效性的当前证据,强调单次注射阻滞因其操作简单和起效迅速而具有优势,但对于较长手术可能需要辅助疼痛管理。连续导管技术虽然能提供长时间的疼痛缓解,但存在感染和导管移位等风险。对这些技术的比较分析表明,两者在术后护理中都有不同的作用,选择取决于手术程序和患者需求。患者满意度、恢复时间和总体预后是确定最佳疼痛管理策略的关键因素。未来的研究应侧重于改进这些技术并探索创新方法,以改善患者护理和疼痛管理效果。本综述为临床医生在术后疼痛管理方面做出明智决策提供了见解,以提高患者舒适度和促进康复。