Suppr超能文献

与药师治疗癌症恶病质的多模式护理实践相关的因素。

Factors Associated with Multimodal Care Practices for Cancer Cachexia among Pharmacists.

机构信息

Department of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2024 Oct 12;31(10):6133-6143. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31100457.

Abstract

Pharmacists' roles in cachexia care are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the knowledge and practice of cachexia care and identify factors related to the practice of cachexia care among pharmacists. Information on the knowledge and practice of cachexia care was obtained. Components of practicing multimodal care were evaluated. Participants were categorized into two groups according to practicing multimodal care levels. Comparisons were made between the groups, and multiple regression analysis was employed. Of the 451 pharmacists, 243 responded. They were categorized into the Practicing group (n = 119) and Not practicing group (n = 124). Significant differences were observed for the number of advanced cancer patients/month, frequency of caring for them, and involvement in training programs on cachexia. The Practicing group had significantly better knowledge about cachexia. The Practicing group used guidelines, items, and symptoms more frequently to detect cachexia. The Practicing group tended to detect cachexia and initiate interventions in earlier phases and in patients with a better status. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the most significant factor was the regular provision of care (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.92). The regular provision of care was associated with the practice of multimodal care.

摘要

药师在恶病质治疗中的角色尚不清楚。本研究旨在阐明药师在恶病质治疗中的知识和实践情况,并确定与药师开展恶病质治疗实践相关的因素。我们获得了有关恶病质治疗知识和实践的信息。评估了开展多模式治疗的各个组成部分。根据开展多模式治疗的水平,我们将参与者分为两组。对两组进行比较,并进行多元回归分析。在 451 名药剂师中,有 243 名做出了回应。他们被分为实践组(n=119)和非实践组(n=124)。每月接受高级癌症患者的人数、照顾他们的频率以及参与恶病质培训计划的情况存在显著差异。实践组对恶病质的知识明显更好。实践组更频繁地使用指南、项目和症状来检测恶病质。实践组倾向于更早地在病情更好的患者中检测到恶病质并开始干预。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,最重要的因素是定期提供护理(比值比,2.07;95%置信区间,1.10-3.92)。定期提供护理与开展多模式治疗有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a443/11506594/53f8c715ae5d/curroncol-31-00457-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验