Suppr超能文献

GaitSmart及一种人工智能解决方案对英国老年人群全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者康复治疗的成本效益分析

Cost-Effectiveness of GaitSmart and an Artificial Intelligence Solution for Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in Older Population in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Zanghelini Fernando, Ponzo Aisling, Xydopoulos Georgios, Fordham Richard, Khanal Saval

机构信息

Health Economics Consulting, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK.

出版信息

Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Oct 5;9(5):129. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9050129.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

GaitSmart (GS) is a sensor-based digital medical device that can be used with the integrated app vGym to provide a personalised rehabilitation programme for older people undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine whether the GS intervention used in the rehabilitation of older people undergoing THA or TKA is potentially cost-effective compared to the current standard of care (SoC).

METHODS

Decision-analytic modelling was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness over a seventeen-week time horizon from an NHS perspective. UK clinical and cost data from the GaitSmart randomised clinical trial was used to obtain the input parameters, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to address uncertainties.

RESULTS

Over a seventeen-week time horizon, GS incurred cost savings of GBP 450.56 and a 0.02 gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to the SoC. These results indicate that GS is the dominant intervention because the device demonstrated greater effectiveness and lower costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of our results.

CONCLUSIONS

GS appears to offer short-term efficiency benefits and demonstrates cost-effectiveness for the improvement in gait in people undergoing THA or TKA, compared to the SoC.

摘要

背景

GaitSmart(GS)是一种基于传感器的数字医疗设备,可与集成应用程序vGym配合使用,为接受全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)的老年人提供个性化康复方案。本研究旨在确定与当前标准护理(SoC)相比,GS干预措施用于接受THA或TKA的老年人康复是否具有潜在成本效益。

方法

从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度,进行决策分析建模以估计17周时间范围内的成本效益。使用来自GaitSmart随机临床试验的英国临床和成本数据来获取输入参数,并进行敏感性分析以解决不确定性。

结果

在17周的时间范围内,与SoC相比,GS节省了450.56英镑的成本,质量调整生命年(QALY)增加了0.02。这些结果表明GS是主要干预措施,因为该设备显示出更高的有效性和更低的成本。概率敏感性分析证实了我们结果的稳健性。

结论

与SoC相比,GS似乎提供了短期效率优势,并证明了在接受THA或TKA的人群中改善步态的成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9512/11508099/fb73f8e934b3/geriatrics-09-00129-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验