Paat Yok-Fong, Hope Trina L, Ferreira-Pinto João B, Olvera Alvarez Hector
Department of Social Work, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Department of Sociology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Sep 30;14(10):2671-2685. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14100176.
Stress is widely known to have debilitating effects on physical health and mental wellbeing, particularly on one's coping styles, personality traits, and outlook on life. Cumulative and chronic stress, which can serve as a triggering or aggravating factor for many pathological disorders if left unaddressed, has been linked to many life-threatening diseases. While many studies have looked at how optimism and pessimism are used as a form of coping mechanism, few have examined how different bio-psycho-social reactions to stress shape the level of optimism and pessimism. Using a sample of adult individuals aged 18 and older in the United States (n = 3361), this study addressed the following research questions: (1) What types of stress are predictive of optimism and pessimism? (2) Which responses to stress and coping mechanisms are most predictive of optimism and pessimism? (3) Do optimism and pessimism share the same stress-related risk and protective factors? Overall, this study found that while optimism and pessimism share conceptual similarities, they are not necessarily influenced by the same stress mechanisms. Stress, whether personal or financial, was associated with a negative outlook on life. This study showed that having good sleep quality and a lower number of psychological stress symptoms was linked to increasing optimism and reducing pessimism, while overeating or eating unhealthily was connected to both optimism and pessimism. Additionally, this study found that exercise/walking and emotional support mediated the effects of the responses to stress on the respondents' level of optimism and pessimism.
众所周知,压力会对身体健康和心理健康产生不利影响,尤其是对一个人的应对方式、性格特征和人生观。累积性和慢性压力如果不加以解决,可能会成为许多病理疾病的触发或加重因素,它与许多危及生命的疾病有关。虽然许多研究探讨了乐观和悲观如何作为一种应对机制,但很少有研究考察不同的生物心理社会应激反应如何塑造乐观和悲观的程度。本研究以美国18岁及以上的成年个体为样本(n = 3361),探讨了以下研究问题:(1)哪些类型的压力可预测乐观和悲观?(2)哪些应激反应和应对机制最能预测乐观和悲观?(3)乐观和悲观是否共享相同的与压力相关的风险和保护因素?总体而言,本研究发现,虽然乐观和悲观在概念上有相似之处,但它们不一定受相同的压力机制影响。压力,无论是个人压力还是经济压力,都与消极的人生观有关。这项研究表明,拥有良好的睡眠质量和较少的心理压力症状与乐观情绪增加和悲观情绪减少有关,而暴饮暴食或不健康饮食则与乐观和悲观情绪都有关。此外,本研究发现,运动/散步和情感支持介导了应激反应对受访者乐观和悲观程度的影响。