• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药师主导的干预措施对墨西哥成年2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项系统评价

Effects of Pharmacist-Led Interventions Regarding Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Mexico: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Blanco-Vega Dulce D, Reyes-López Alfonso, Vargas-Neri Jessica L, Osnaya-Valencia Frida I

机构信息

Department of Epidemiological Research, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City 06720, Mexico.

Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Sep 27;12(5):148. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12050148.

DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12050148
PMID:39452804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11511297/
Abstract

In Mexico, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a serious public health concern. As experts in drug therapy, pharmacists are essential additions to multidisciplinary diabetes patient care teams. There have been no systematic reviews or meta-analyses performed on pharmacist-led interventions (PIs) in Mexico; therefore, the impact of PIs on patients remains poorly explored. An electronic search of the PubMed, SciELO and BVS databases and certain institutional repositories was conducted in English and Spanish through 24 August 2021 with a subsequent update through June 2024. A total of 1302 potentially relevant studies were identified in the initial search, of which nine met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. The results suggest that PIs, such as pharmacotherapeutic follow-up and patient education, may have positive effects on outcomes in Mexican patients with T2DM. PIs led to significant reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and arterial blood pressure levels, general reductions in body mass index and negative outcomes associated with medication, as well as significant improvements in therapeutic adherence and patient knowledge in the intervention group during follow-up periods of 3-12 months. Further well-designed research, including controlled studies with adequate sample sizes and standardized tools, is essential to fully understand the effects of PIs regarding patients with T2DM in Mexico.

摘要

在墨西哥,2型糖尿病(T2DM)是一个严重的公共卫生问题。作为药物治疗方面的专家,药剂师是多学科糖尿病患者护理团队中不可或缺的成员。墨西哥尚未对药剂师主导的干预措施(PI)进行系统评价或荟萃分析;因此,PI对患者的影响仍未得到充分探讨。通过在PubMed、SciELO和BVS数据库以及某些机构知识库中进行电子检索,检索语言为英语和西班牙语,检索截止日期为2021年8月24日,随后更新至2024年6月。在初步检索中总共识别出1302项潜在相关研究,其中9项符合纳入标准并被纳入本系统评价。结果表明,诸如药物治疗随访和患者教育等PI可能对墨西哥T2DM患者的治疗结果产生积极影响。在3至12个月的随访期内,PI导致干预组糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、甘油三酯、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和动脉血压水平显著降低,体重指数总体下降,与药物相关的不良后果减少,治疗依从性和患者知识水平显著提高。进一步开展设计良好的研究,包括具有足够样本量和标准化工具的对照研究,对于全面了解PI对墨西哥T2DM患者的影响至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1529/11511297/00f555c18625/pharmacy-12-00148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1529/11511297/00f555c18625/pharmacy-12-00148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1529/11511297/00f555c18625/pharmacy-12-00148-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Pharmacist-Led Interventions Regarding Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Mexico: A Systematic Review.药师主导的干预措施对墨西哥成年2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项系统评价
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Sep 27;12(5):148. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12050148.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Community-based care for the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.基于社区的2型糖尿病管理:循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(23):1-40. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
4
Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Program on Improving Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus from Northern Cyprus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.北塞浦路斯药师主导的项目对改善 2 型糖尿病患者结局的效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 May;23(5):573-582. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.5.573.
5
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.2型糖尿病的行为干预:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
6
Pharmacist Interventions in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.药师干预在 2 型糖尿病管理中的作用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 May;22(5):493-515. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.5.493.
7
Pharmacist-Led Self-management Interventions to Improve Diabetes Outcomes. A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.药师主导的自我管理干预措施改善糖尿病结局:一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Dec 14;8:891. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00891. eCollection 2017.
8
Randomized controlled trial of clinical pharmacy management of patients with type 2 diabetes in an outpatient diabetes clinic in Jordan.约旦一家门诊糖尿病诊所中2型糖尿病患者临床药学管理的随机对照试验
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Sep;18(7):516-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.516.
9
The impact of pharmacist care on diabetes outcomes in primary care settings: An umbrella review of published systematic reviews.药师护理对初级保健环境中糖尿病结局的影响:已发表系统评价的伞式综述。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Oct;14(5):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.12.007. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
10
Impact of community pharmacist-led interventions in chronic disease management on clinical, utilization, and economic outcomes: An umbrella review.社区药剂师主导的慢性病管理干预措施对临床、利用情况及经济结局的影响:一项伞状综述
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Sep;16(9):1155-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.12.016. Epub 2020 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding team-based care for hypertension and cardiovascular risk management with HEARTS in the Americas.通过“美洲地区高血压和心血管风险管理强化治疗与培训体系(HEARTS)”扩大基于团队的医疗服务
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 May 12;49:e43. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.43. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2022 年美国糖尿病协会 (ADA) 和欧洲糖尿病研究协会 (EASD) 共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Nov 1;45(11):2753-2786. doi: 10.2337/dci22-0034.
2
Impact of Pharmaceutical Education on Medication Adherence and Its Clinical Efficacy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Systemic Arterial Hypertension.药学教育对2型糖尿病和系统性动脉高血压患者药物依从性及其临床疗效的影响
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Aug 5;16:1999-2007. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S370323. eCollection 2022.
3
Impact of Pharmacists-Led Interventions in Primary Care for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes on HbA1c Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
药师主导的干预措施对2型糖尿病成年患者初级保健中糖化血红蛋白水平的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3156. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063156.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Impact of clinical pharmacy in oncology and hematology centers: A systematic review.临床药学在肿瘤和血液学中心的影响:系统评价。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2021 Apr;27(3):679-692. doi: 10.1177/1078155220976801. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
6
Clinical pharmacists´ interventions in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.临床药师对2型糖尿病管理的干预措施:一项系统综述
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jul-Sep;18(3):2000. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.3.2000. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
7
Clinical and economic outcomes of hospital pharmaceutical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医院药学服务的临床与经济结果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05346-8.
8
Pharmaceutical care-based interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.基于药学服务的2型糖尿病干预措施:一项随机临床试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020 Jan 31;18:eRW4686. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020RW4686. eCollection 2020.
9
Economic evaluations of clinical pharmacy services in China: a systematic review.中国临床药学服务的经济评价:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 6;10(1):e034862. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034862.
10
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.