Bento Teresa, Vitorino Anabela, Cid Luís, Monteiro Diogo, Couto Nuno
Sport Sciences School of Rio Maior, Santarém Polytechnic University (ESDRM-IPSantarém), 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
Research Center in Sport Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
Sports (Basel). 2024 Oct 16;12(10):279. doi: 10.3390/sports12100279.
Both the Dualistic Model of Passion and Self-Determination Theory suggest that the persistence of a behaviour over time derives from the internalisation of the passion or motivation that the individual feels about the activity. However, the integration of these theoretical assumptions may lead to a better understanding of related outcomes, in particular on subjective well-being (SWB). In this context, this study aimed at systematically reviewing the relation between passion, behaviour regulation (i.e., self-determined motivation), and SWB in sport. The PRISMA 2020 protocol was used to guide the systematic review. Electronic searches were conducted in the Web of Science database and Pubmed. The following descriptors were used: SWB; passion; motivation; behavioural regulation; and sport. After the search, 12 studies were retrieved for analysis that show us the following results tendencies: harmonious passion (HP) and autonomous motivation (AM) (i.e., more self-determined forms of behaviour regulation) are positively related to SWB (i.e., life satisfaction and positive affect), while obsessive passion (OP) and controlled motivation (CM) (i.e., less self-determined forms of behaviour regulation) are negatively associated with SWB. However, no studies were found to simultaneously analyse the three theoretical constructs. These results show us the importance of developing conditions in sport contexts that promote positive feelings that take into account athletes' development of harmonious passion and self-determined behaviour regulation, in order to achieve higher levels of well-being. Nevertheless, these results also lead us to the necessity for more studies to highlight the theoretical link between passion and motivation in the context of sport, especially regarding the mediating role of motivation in the relationship between passion and well-being.
激情二元模型和自我决定理论均表明,一种行为随时间的持续源于个体对该活动所感受到的激情或动机的内化。然而,整合这些理论假设可能会使我们对相关结果有更好的理解,特别是对主观幸福感(SWB)的理解。在此背景下,本研究旨在系统回顾体育运动中激情、行为调节(即自我决定动机)与主观幸福感之间的关系。采用PRISMA 2020方案来指导系统回顾。在科学网数据库和PubMed中进行了电子检索。使用了以下描述词:主观幸福感;激情;动机;行为调节;以及体育运动。检索后,筛选出12项研究进行分析,这些研究向我们展示了以下结果趋势:和谐激情(HP)和自主动机(AM)(即行为调节中更具自我决定性质的形式)与主观幸福感(即生活满意度和积极情绪)呈正相关,而强迫性激情(OP)和控制性动机(CM)(即行为调节中自我决定程度较低的形式)与主观幸福感呈负相关。然而,未发现有研究同时分析这三种理论构念。这些结果向我们表明,在体育环境中创造条件以促进积极情绪非常重要,这些条件应考虑到运动员和谐激情和自我决定行为调节的发展,以便实现更高水平的幸福感。尽管如此,这些结果也使我们认识到有必要开展更多研究,以突出体育运动背景下激情与动机之间的理论联系,特别是动机在激情与幸福感关系中的中介作用。