Independent Scholar, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Anthropology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0309107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309107. eCollection 2024.
Although archaeologists are learning more about the lives of Upper Paleolithic children, the significant contributions they made to the welfare of their communities, including their role in craft production, remain understudied. In the present study, we use high resolution photographs of 489 ceramic artifacts from Dolní Věstonice I and II, Pavlov I and VI, and Předmostí, five archaeological sites in Czechia (ca. 30,000 BP) to address two questions: 1. Can the ceramic products of novices be distinguished from those made by experts? 2. If so, can we tell if these novices were children? To address these questions, we documented variables known ethnographically and archaeologically to be associated with learners in a sample from these five sites. The sample is composed of fired ("ceramic") and unfired ("sedimentary") anthropomorphic and zoomorphic figurines, non-diagnostic figurine fragments and a sample of the so-called "pellets" from one site, Pavlov I. Our results support the hypothesis that ceramic objects are the products of novices, and in many cases, these novices are children. Our findings have implications for inter-generational knowledge transmission, the role of children in craft production and the importance of learning through play.
尽管考古学家对旧石器时代晚期儿童的生活有了更多的了解,但他们对社区福利的重要贡献,包括他们在工艺生产中的作用,仍未得到充分研究。在本研究中,我们使用了来自捷克的五个考古遗址(约 30000 BP)的 489 件陶瓷制品的高分辨率照片,这些遗址包括 Dolní Věstonice I 和 II、Pavlov I 和 VI 以及 Předmostí,来回答两个问题:1. 能否区分新手和专家制作的陶瓷产品?2. 如果可以,我们能否判断这些新手是儿童?为了解决这些问题,我们记录了这些遗址的变量,这些变量在民族志和考古学上与学习者有关。该样本由来自五个遗址的烧制(“陶瓷”)和未烧制(“沉积”)的拟人化和动物化小雕像、非诊断性小雕像碎片以及一个所谓的“小球”样本组成。我们的结果支持了这样的假设,即陶瓷制品是新手的产物,而且在许多情况下,这些新手是儿童。我们的发现对代际知识传播、儿童在工艺生产中的作用以及通过游戏学习的重要性具有重要意义。