• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对食品欺诈:尼日利亚消费者知识与态度调查

Navigating Food Fraud: A Survey of Nigerian Consumer Knowledge and Attitudes.

作者信息

Onyeaka Helen, Anyogu Amarachukwu, Odeyemi Olumide A, Ukwuru Michael Ukwuru, Eze Ukpai, Isaac-Bamgboye Folayemi J, Anumudu Christian K, Akinwunmi Oluwabunmi O, Sotayo Olufemi Peter, Jeff-Agboola Yemisi A

机构信息

School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

School of Biomedical Sciences, University of West London, London W5 5RF, UK.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):3270. doi: 10.3390/foods13203270.

DOI:10.3390/foods13203270
PMID:39456332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11508003/
Abstract

Food fraud presents a growing threat globally, impacting consumer health; food safety; and brand credibility. The key motivation for food fraud is usually an economic or financial advantage. Economically motivated food fraud (EMA) is the illegal deception, deliberate and intentional substitution or addition of a substance in a food product, which may pose a possible health risk to unsuspecting consumers. This study aims to assess the awareness and attitudes of Nigerian consumers towards food authenticity and the regulatory measures in place to combat food adulteration. The study comprised 2160 respondents who were asked about their knowledge of high-profile food fraud incidents, frequently adulterated products, and their opinions of the effects of food fraud and preventative measures. The findings of this study revealed that more than a third of respondents were unfamiliar with the term "food fraud". However, they were aware of local high-profile cases, such as "plastic rice" and counterfeit dairy products. Most participants relied on point-of-sale information for assessing food authenticity, with street vendors being viewed as potential sources of food adulteration. The study also found that more than half of the respondents were concerned about food fraud regardless of whether it involved local or imported products. A wide variety of food items were identified as prone to adulteration or fraudulent activity. These included alcoholic drinks, dairy products, honey, rice, and tomato paste, amongst others. These findings highlight the need for improved consumer awareness, regulatory effectiveness, and remediation efforts to combat food fraud in Nigeria.

摘要

食品欺诈在全球构成的威胁日益增大,影响着消费者健康、食品安全以及品牌信誉。食品欺诈的主要动机通常是经济或财务利益。出于经济动机的食品欺诈(EMA)是指在食品中非法欺骗、故意替换或添加某种物质,这可能会对毫无戒心的消费者构成健康风险。本研究旨在评估尼日利亚消费者对食品真实性的认知和态度,以及为打击食品掺假而采取的监管措施。该研究涵盖了2160名受访者,询问了他们对重大食品欺诈事件、经常被掺假的产品的了解,以及他们对食品欺诈影响和预防措施的看法。这项研究的结果显示,超过三分之一的受访者不熟悉“食品欺诈”这个术语。然而,他们知晓当地的重大案件,如“塑料大米”和假冒乳制品。大多数参与者依靠销售点信息来评估食品的真实性,街头小贩被视为食品掺假的潜在源头。研究还发现,超过一半的受访者担心食品欺诈,无论其涉及本地产品还是进口产品。多种食品被确定容易掺假或存在欺诈行为。这些食品包括酒精饮料、乳制品、蜂蜜、大米和番茄酱等。这些发现凸显了在尼日利亚提高消费者意识、监管有效性以及打击食品欺诈补救措施的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/2b1e61154adf/foods-13-03270-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/9542a82e9a3a/foods-13-03270-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/14ea29b5db59/foods-13-03270-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/0788c5c4ef94/foods-13-03270-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/69e1b697cb62/foods-13-03270-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/2b1e61154adf/foods-13-03270-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/9542a82e9a3a/foods-13-03270-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/14ea29b5db59/foods-13-03270-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/0788c5c4ef94/foods-13-03270-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/69e1b697cb62/foods-13-03270-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6be/11508003/2b1e61154adf/foods-13-03270-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Navigating Food Fraud: A Survey of Nigerian Consumer Knowledge and Attitudes.应对食品欺诈:尼日利亚消费者知识与态度调查
Foods. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):3270. doi: 10.3390/foods13203270.
2
International Survey of Food Fraud and Related Terminology: Preliminary Results and Discussion.国际食品欺诈及相关术语调查:初步结果与讨论。
J Food Sci. 2019 Oct;84(10):2705-2718. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14705. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Economically Motivated Food Fraud and Adulteration in Brazil: Incidents and Alternatives to Minimize Occurrence.巴西的经济动机型食品欺诈和掺假:事件及发生最小化的替代方案。
J Food Sci. 2018 Aug;83(8):2028-2038. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14279. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
Defining the public health threat of food fraud.定义食品欺诈对公共健康的威胁。
J Food Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;76(9):R157-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02417.x.
5
Economically motivated adulteration (EMA) of food: common characteristics of EMA incidents.经济驱动的食品掺假(EMA):EMA 事件的共同特征。
J Food Prot. 2013 Apr;76(4):723-35. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-399.
6
Development of a Hazard Classification Scheme for Substances Used in the Fraudulent Adulteration of Foods.用于食品欺诈掺假的物质危害分类方案的制定。
J Food Prot. 2018 Jan;81(1):31-36. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-173.
7
Consumer Perception of Food Fraud in Serbia and Montenegro.塞尔维亚和黑山消费者对食品欺诈的认知。
Foods. 2023 Dec 22;13(1):53. doi: 10.3390/foods13010053.
8
Food fraud and the perceived integrity of European food imports into China.食品掺假与欧洲输华食品的可信度感知
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0195817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195817. eCollection 2018.
9
Consumer Knowledge about Food Labeling and Fraud.消费者对食品标签及欺诈行为的认知。
Foods. 2021 May 15;10(5):1095. doi: 10.3390/foods10051095.
10
Authenticity of food products in the Polish market checked during 2005-2012.2005年至2012年期间对波兰市场上食品的真实性进行了检查。
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2015;66(1):27-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning-Enhanced Spectroscopic Technologies for Food Quality Assessment: Convergence and Emerging Frontiers.用于食品质量评估的深度学习增强光谱技术:融合与新兴前沿
Foods. 2025 Jul 2;14(13):2350. doi: 10.3390/foods14132350.

本文引用的文献

1
How Worried Are You about Food Fraud? A Preliminary Multi-Country Study among Consumers in Selected Sub-Saharan African Countries.你对食品欺诈有多担心?撒哈拉以南非洲部分国家消费者的初步多国研究。
Foods. 2023 Sep 29;12(19):3627. doi: 10.3390/foods12193627.
2
Illicit Alcohol: Public Health Risk of Methanol Poisoning and Policy Mitigation Strategies.非法酒精:甲醇中毒的公共卫生风险及政策缓解策略
Foods. 2021 Jul 13;10(7):1625. doi: 10.3390/foods10071625.
3
Consumer Knowledge about Food Labeling and Fraud.消费者对食品标签及欺诈行为的认知。
Foods. 2021 May 15;10(5):1095. doi: 10.3390/foods10051095.
4
Gender differences in perceived food healthiness and food avoidance in a Swedish population-based survey: a cross sectional study.基于人群的瑞典调查研究中对食物健康感知和食物回避的性别差异:一项横断面研究。
Nutr J. 2020 Dec 29;19(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00659-0.
5
Going web or staying paper? The use of web-surveys among older people.上网还是用纸?老年人对网络调查的使用情况。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01138-0.
6
Optical screening for presence of banned Sudan III and Sudan IV dyes in edible palm oils.食用棕榈油中禁用苏丹红 III 和苏丹红 IV 染料的光学筛选。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2020 Jul;37(7):1049-1060. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2020.1726500. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
7
Four years post-horsegate: an update of measures and actions put in place following the horsemeat incident of 2013.马肉丑闻四年后:2013年马肉事件后所采取措施及行动的最新情况
NPJ Sci Food. 2017 Nov 6;1:5. doi: 10.1038/s41538-017-0007-z. eCollection 2017.
8
Innovative technologies to manage aflatoxins in foods and feeds and the profitability of application - A review.食品和饲料中黄曲霉毒素管理的创新技术及其应用的盈利能力——综述
Food Control. 2017 Jun;76:127-138. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.01.008.
9
Food safety knowledge and hygiene practices among veterinary medicine students at Trakia University, Bulgaria.保加利亚特拉基阿大学兽医学学生的食品安全知识和卫生习惯。
J Infect Public Health. 2017 Nov-Dec;10(6):778-782. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
10
The Methanol Poisoning Outbreaks in Libya 2013 and Kenya 2014.2013年利比亚和2014年肯尼亚的甲醇中毒事件
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152676. eCollection 2016.