• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能生存预测建模:考虑治疗及健康状况随时间变化的重要性。

AI Survival Prediction Modeling: The Importance of Considering Treatments and Changes in Health Status over Time.

作者信息

Adam Nabil, Wieder Robert

机构信息

Phalcon, LLC, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.

Newark Campus, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;16(20):3527. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203527.

DOI:10.3390/cancers16203527
PMID:39456622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11505986/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Deep learning (DL)-based models for predicting the survival of patients with local stages of breast cancer only use time-fixed covariates, i.e., patient and cancer data at the time of diagnosis. These predictions are inherently error-prone because they do not consider time-varying events that occur after initial diagnosis. Our objective is to improve the predictive modeling of survival of patients with localized breast cancer to consider both time-fixed and time-varying events; thus, we take into account the progression of a patient's health status over time.

METHODS

We extended four DL-based predictive survival models (DeepSurv, DeepHit, Nnet-survival, and Cox-Time) that deal with right-censored time-to-event data to consider not only a patient's time-fixed covariates (patient and cancer data at diagnosis) but also a patient's time-varying covariates (e.g., treatments, comorbidities, progressive age, frailty index, adverse events from treatment). We utilized, as our study data, the SEER-Medicare linked dataset from 1991 to 2016 to study a population of women diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer (BC) enrolled in Medicare at 65 years or older as qualified by age. We delineated time-fixed variables recorded at the time of diagnosis, including age, race, marital status, breast cancer stage, tumor grade, laterality, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2) status, and comorbidity index. We analyzed six distinct prognostic categories, cancer stages I-III BC, and each stage's ER/PR+ or ER/PR- status. At each visit, we delineated the time-varying covariates of administered treatments, induced adverse events, comorbidity index, and age. We predicted the survival of three hypothetical patients to demonstrate the model's utility.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes of the modeling were the measures of the model's prediction error, as measured by the concordance index, the most commonly applied evaluation metric in survival analysis, and the integrated Brier score, a metric of the model's discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

The proposed extended patients' covariates that include both time-fixed and time-varying covariates significantly improved the deep learning models' prediction error and the discrimination and calibration of a model's estimates. The prediction of the four DL models using time-fixed covariates in six different prognostic categories all resulted in approximately a 30% error in all six categories. When applying the proposed extension to include time-varying covariates, the accuracy of all four predictive models improved significantly, with the error decreasing to approximately 10%. The models' predictive accuracy was independent of the differing published survival predictions from time-fixed covariates in the six prognostic categories. We demonstrate the utility of the model in three hypothetical patients with unique patient, cancer, and treatment variables. The model predicted survival based on the patient's individual time-fixed and time-varying features, which varied considerably from Social Security age-based, and stage and race-based breast cancer survival predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive modeling of the survival of patients with early-stage breast cancer using DL models has a prediction error of around 30% when considering only time-fixed covariates at the time of diagnosis and decreases to values under 10% when time-varying covariates are added as input to the models, regardless of the prognostic category of the patient groups. These models can be used to predict individual patients' survival probabilities based on their unique repertoire of time-fixed and time-varying features. They will provide guidance for patients and their caregivers to assist in decision making.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b2/11505986/562472f7ac2f/cancers-16-03527-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b2/11505986/b9f2a603956d/cancers-16-03527-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b2/11505986/562472f7ac2f/cancers-16-03527-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b2/11505986/b9f2a603956d/cancers-16-03527-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b2/11505986/562472f7ac2f/cancers-16-03527-g002.jpg
摘要

背景与目的

基于深度学习(DL)的预测局部阶段乳腺癌患者生存率的模型仅使用固定时间协变量,即诊断时的患者和癌症数据。这些预测本质上容易出错,因为它们没有考虑初始诊断后发生的随时间变化的事件。我们的目标是改进局部乳腺癌患者生存率的预测模型,以同时考虑固定时间和随时间变化的事件;因此,我们考虑了患者健康状况随时间的进展。

方法

我们扩展了四种基于DL的预测生存模型(DeepSurv、DeepHit、Nnet-survival和Cox-Time),这些模型用于处理右删失的事件发生时间数据,不仅考虑患者的固定时间协变量(诊断时的患者和癌症数据),还考虑患者的随时间变化的协变量(例如,治疗、合并症、年龄增长、虚弱指数、治疗引起的不良事件)。我们使用1991年至2016年的SEER - Medicare关联数据集作为研究数据,以研究65岁及以上符合年龄条件并参加医疗保险的I - III期乳腺癌(BC)女性人群。我们划定了诊断时记录的固定时间变量,包括年龄、种族、婚姻状况、乳腺癌分期、肿瘤分级、患侧、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和人表皮受体2(HER2)状态以及合并症指数。我们分析了六个不同的预后类别,即I - III期BC癌症,以及每个阶段的ER/PR +或ER/PR -状态。在每次随访时,我们划定了所给予治疗、诱发的不良事件、合并症指数和年龄等随时间变化的协变量。我们预测了三名假设患者的生存率,以证明模型的效用。

主要结局与指标

建模的主要结局是模型预测误差的度量,通过一致性指数(生存分析中最常用的评估指标)和综合Brier评分(模型区分度和校准度的指标)来衡量。

结果

所提出的扩展患者协变量,包括固定时间和随时间变化的协变量,显著改善了深度学习模型的预测误差以及模型估计的区分度和校准度。在六个不同预后类别中使用固定时间协变量的四个DL模型的预测在所有六个类别中均导致约30%的误差。当应用所提出的扩展以纳入随时间变化的协变量时,所有四个预测模型的准确性均显著提高,误差降至约10%。模型的预测准确性与六个预后类别中固定时间协变量的不同已发表生存预测无关。我们在三名具有独特患者、癌症和治疗变量的假设患者中展示了模型的效用。该模型基于患者个体的固定时间和随时间变化的特征预测生存率,这与基于社会保障年龄、分期和种族的乳腺癌生存预测有很大差异。

结论

使用DL模型对早期乳腺癌患者生存率进行预测建模时,仅考虑诊断时的固定时间协变量时预测误差约为30%,当将随时间变化的协变量作为模型输入添加时,误差降至10%以下,无论患者群体的预后类别如何。这些模型可用于根据患者独特的固定时间和随时间变化特征集预测个体患者的生存概率。它们将为患者及其护理人员提供指导以协助决策。

相似文献

1
AI Survival Prediction Modeling: The Importance of Considering Treatments and Changes in Health Status over Time.人工智能生存预测建模:考虑治疗及健康状况随时间变化的重要性。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;16(20):3527. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203527.
2
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Temporal Association Rule Mining: Race-Based Patterns of Treatment-Adverse Events in Breast Cancer Patients Using SEER-Medicare Dataset.时间关联规则挖掘:使用SEER-医疗保险数据集分析乳腺癌患者基于种族的治疗-不良事件模式
Biomedicines. 2024 May 29;12(6):1213. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12061213.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人新诊断慢性淋巴细胞白血病的预后模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 31;7(7):CD012022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012022.pub2.
7
Time-related survival prediction in molecular subtypes of breast cancer using time-to-event deep-learning-based models.使用基于深度学习的事件发生时间模型对乳腺癌分子亚型进行与时间相关的生存预测。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 5;13:1147604. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1147604. eCollection 2023.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.用于指导早期乳腺癌女性辅助化疗决策的基因表达谱分析:基于证据的经济分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(23):1-57. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
10
Does the SORG Algorithm Predict 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma? An External Validation.SORG 算法能否预测软骨肉瘤患者的 5 年生存率?一项外部验证。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Oct;477(10):2296-2303. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000748.

引用本文的文献

1
A stacking ensemble framework integrating radiomics and deep learning for prognostic prediction in head and neck cancer.一种整合放射组学和深度学习的堆叠集成框架,用于头颈癌的预后预测。
Radiat Oncol. 2025 Aug 13;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02695-8.
2
Predictive Modeling of Long-Term Survivors with Stage IV Breast Cancer Using the SEER-Medicare Dataset.利用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据集对IV期乳腺癌长期幸存者进行预测建模。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 1;16(23):4033. doi: 10.3390/cancers16234033.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk Prediction: A Systematic Review of Statistical and Machine Learning-Based Models.乳腺癌复发风险预测的演变:基于统计和机器学习模型的系统评价。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Aug;7:e2300049. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00049.
2
Age of onset and cumulative risk of mental disorders: a cross-national analysis of population surveys from 29 countries.发病年龄与精神障碍的累积风险:29 个国家人口调查的跨国分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;10(9):668-681. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00193-1. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
3
Awakening of Dormant Breast Cancer Cells in the Bone Marrow.
骨髓中休眠乳腺癌细胞的苏醒
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 1;15(11):3021. doi: 10.3390/cancers15113021.
4
Association of Social Determinants and Tumor Biology With Racial Disparity in Survival From Early-Stage, Hormone-Dependent Breast Cancer.社会决定因素和肿瘤生物学与早期激素依赖性乳腺癌生存的种族差异相关。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):536-545. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7705.
5
Racial Differences in Breast Cancer Therapeutic Toxicity: Implications for Practice.种族差异与乳腺癌治疗毒性:对实践的启示。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Feb 6;32(2):157-158. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1111.
6
Survival prediction models: an introduction to discrete-time modeling.生存预测模型:离散时间建模简介。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 26;22(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01679-6.
7
Potential Impact of Revised NCI Eligibility Criteria Guidance: Prior Malignancy Exclusion in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.修订后的 NCI 资格标准指导意见的潜在影响:乳腺癌临床试验中既往恶性肿瘤的排除。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Jul;20(7):792-799.e4. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7017.
8
Patient-reported treatment toxicity and adverse events in Black and White women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer.黑人和白人女性接受早期乳腺癌化疗的患者报告治疗毒性和不良事件。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan;191(2):409-422. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06439-6. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
9
Continuous and discrete-time survival prediction with neural networks.神经网络的连续时间和离散时间生存预测。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2021 Oct;27(4):710-736. doi: 10.1007/s10985-021-09532-6. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
10
Life expectancy estimates based on comorbidities and frailty to inform preventive care.基于合并症和虚弱程度的预期寿命估计,以提供预防保健信息。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jan;70(1):99-109. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17468. Epub 2021 Sep 18.