• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者对澳大利亚 2 型糖尿病患者可接受的、设计良好的、整合的农产品处方的观点:一项形成性研究。

Stakeholder Perspectives on the Acceptability, Design, and Integration of Produce Prescriptions for People with Type 2 Diabetes in Australia: A Formative Study.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

Diabetes Australia, Sydney, NSW 2037, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 8;21(10):1330. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101330.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21101330
PMID:39457303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11507040/
Abstract

Produce prescription programs can benefit both individuals and health systems; however, best practices for integrating such programs into the Australian health system are yet unknown. This study explored stakeholders' perspectives on the acceptability, potential design and integration of produce prescription programs for adults with type 2 diabetes in Australia. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 22 participants for an online workshop, representing six stakeholder groups (government, healthcare service, clinician, food retailer, consumer, non-government organisation). Participant responses were gathered through workshop discussions and a virtual collaboration tool (Mural). The workshop was video-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted using a deductive-inductive approach. Stakeholders recognised produce prescription as an acceptable intervention; however, they identified challenges to implementation related to contextuality, accessibility, and sustainability. Stakeholders were vocal about the approach (e.g., community-led) and infrastructure (e.g., screening tools) needed to support program design and implementation but expressed diverse views about potential funding models, indicating a need for further investigation. Aligning evaluation outcomes with existing measures in local, State and Federal initiatives was recommended, and entry points for integration were identified within and outside of the Australian health sector. Our findings provide clear considerations for future produce prescription interventions for people with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

生产处方项目既有益于个人也有益于卫生系统;然而,将此类项目融入澳大利亚卫生系统的最佳实践尚不清楚。本研究探讨了利益相关者对澳大利亚 2 型糖尿病成年人生产处方项目的可接受性、潜在设计和整合的看法。采用目的性抽样,通过在线研讨会招募了 22 名参与者,代表六个利益相关者群体(政府、医疗服务、临床医生、食品零售商、消费者、非政府组织)。通过研讨会讨论和虚拟协作工具(Mural)收集参与者的反馈。研讨会进行了视频录制并逐字转录,并采用演绎归纳法进行主题分析。利益相关者认为生产处方是一种可接受的干预措施;然而,他们确定了与上下文、可及性和可持续性相关的实施挑战。利益相关者对支持项目设计和实施所需的方法(例如,社区主导)和基础设施(例如,筛选工具)直言不讳,但对潜在的资金模式持不同意见,表明需要进一步研究。建议将评估结果与当地、州和联邦倡议中的现有措施保持一致,并确定澳大利亚卫生部门内外的整合切入点。我们的研究结果为 2 型糖尿病患者的未来生产处方干预提供了明确的考虑因素。

相似文献

1
Stakeholder Perspectives on the Acceptability, Design, and Integration of Produce Prescriptions for People with Type 2 Diabetes in Australia: A Formative Study.利益相关者对澳大利亚 2 型糖尿病患者可接受的、设计良好的、整合的农产品处方的观点:一项形成性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 8;21(10):1330. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101330.
2
Bridging barriers to advance multisector approaches to improve food security, nutrition and population health in Nepal: transdisciplinary perspectives.跨越障碍,推进多部门方法,改善尼泊尔的粮食安全、营养和人口健康:跨学科视角。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 18;19(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7204-4.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
A qualitative study of the perceptions and experiences of participants and healthcare professionals in the DiRECT-Australia type 2 diabetes remission service.一项关于 DiRECT-Australia 2 型糖尿病缓解服务中参与者和医疗保健专业人员的看法和经验的定性研究。
Diabet Med. 2024 Jun;41(6):e15301. doi: 10.1111/dme.15301. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
5
Accelerating implementation of adolescent digital health prevention programs: analysis of insights from Australian stakeholders.加速实施青少年数字健康预防计划:对澳大利亚利益相关者的见解进行分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 3;12:1389739. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1389739. eCollection 2024.
6
Developing and testing a produce prescription implementation blueprint to improve food security in a clinical setting: a pilot study protocol.制定并测试一份农产品处方实施蓝图以改善临床环境中的食品安全:一项试点研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Mar 23;10(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01467-7.
7
A Qualitative Study to Understand Stakeholders' Views About the Fruits & Veggies (FNV) Social Marketing Campaign to Promote Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in the United States.一项定性研究,旨在了解利益相关者对“水果与蔬菜(FNV)”社会营销活动的看法,该活动旨在促进美国的水果和蔬菜消费。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Dec;120(12):1986-1997.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
8
Prescription drug monitoring program in Australia: a qualitative study of stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of a state-wide implementation.澳大利亚的处方药物监测项目:对利益相关者在全州范围内实施该项目的经验和看法的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 29;24(1):1147. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11614-8.
9
Stakeholders' Perspectives on the Current Status of Partnerships between the Food Banking and Healthcare Systems to Address Food Insecurity in the U.S.利益相关者视角下美国家庭食品银行与医疗系统伙伴关系的现状——以解决食品不安全问题为中心
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):4502. doi: 10.3390/nu13124502.
10
Improving the integration of care for trans adults: ICTA a mixed-methods study.改善跨性别成人的护理整合:ICTA 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(28):1-217. doi: 10.3310/EWTA4502.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of Food is Medicine Programs in Healthcare Settings: A Narrative Review.医疗机构实施“医食同源”计划:叙事性综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(14):2797-2805. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08768-w. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
2
Developing and testing a produce prescription implementation blueprint to improve food security in a clinical setting: a pilot study protocol.制定并测试一份农产品处方实施蓝图以改善临床环境中的食品安全:一项试点研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Mar 23;10(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01467-7.
3
"Food Is Medicine" Strategies for Nutrition Security and Cardiometabolic Health Equity: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.《食物是良药》:保障营养安全和实现心血管代谢健康公平的策略:美国心脏病学会最新综述。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Feb 27;83(8):843-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.023.
4
Translation of a Diabetes Remission Service into Australian Primary Care: Findings from the Evaluation of DiRECT-Australia.将糖尿病缓解服务转化为澳大利亚初级保健服务:来自 DiRECT-Australia 评估的结果。
J Diabetes Res. 2024 Feb 8;2024:2350551. doi: 10.1155/2024/2350551. eCollection 2024.
5
Adoption and implementation of produce prescription programs for under-resourced populations: clinic staff perspectives.为资源匮乏人群采用和实施农产品处方计划:诊所工作人员的观点。
Front Nutr. 2023 Oct 27;10:1221785. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1221785. eCollection 2023.
6
A 5-year review of prevalence, temporal trends and characteristics of individuals experiencing moderate and severe food insecurity in 34 high income countries.34 个高收入国家中经历中度和重度粮食不安全个体的流行率、时间趋势和特征的 5 年回顾。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;23(1):2215. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17139-9.
7
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of medically tailored meals compared to usual care among individuals with type 2 diabetes in Australia.澳大利亚 2 型糖尿病患者医学定制膳食与常规护理随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Sep;132:107307. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107307. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
8
Food Insecurity and Diabetes: Overview of Intersections and Potential Dual Solutions.食物不安全与糖尿病:交叉问题与潜在双重解决方案概述。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Sep 1;46(9):1599-1608. doi: 10.2337/dci23-0002.
9
Testing the Feasibility and Dietary Impact of a "Produce Prescription" Program for Adults with Undermanaged Type 2 Diabetes and Food Insecurity in Australia.测试“农产品处方”项目在澳大利亚 2 型糖尿病未得到良好管理且存在食物不安全感的成年人中的可行性和饮食影响。
J Nutr. 2022 Nov;152(11):2409-2418. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac152. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
10
"I Felt Like I Had Something I Could Do About It": Pediatric Clinician Experiences With a Food Insecurity-Focused Produce Prescription Program.“我觉得我可以为此做点什么”:儿科临床医生参与粮食不安全为重点的农产品处方项目的经验。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2023 Oct;62(9):1018-1026. doi: 10.1177/00099228221150604. Epub 2023 Jan 23.