Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services, Toronto, ON M5T 3A9, Canada.
Department of Sociology, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 11;21(10):1347. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101347.
The global escalation of conflict, violence, and human rights violations sets a pressing backdrop for examining the resilience of forcibly displaced youth (FDY) in Canada. This study aims to unpack the multifaceted challenges and resilience mechanisms of FDY, focusing on their health, well-being, and integration into host communities. It seeks to identify current models of resilience, understand the factors within each model, and highlight gaps and limitations. Using a university librarian-supported structured search strategy, this exploratory rapid review searched literature from Ovid Medline and open-source databases, published in English between January 2019 and January 2024, that fit specific inclusion criteria. The eligible articles (N = 12 out of 4096) were charted and analyzed by two student researchers with the Principal Investigator (PI). Charted data were analyzed thematically. The selected studies captured diverse geographical perspectives, resilience models (such as Ungar's ecological perspective and Masten's resilience developmental models), as well as protective and promotive frameworks. Key findings indicate the complexity of resilience influenced by individual, familial, societal, and cultural factors. Each model offers insights into the dynamic interplay of these influences on FDY's resilience. However, these models often fall short of addressing the nuances of cultural specificity, the impact of trauma, and the intersectionality of FDY's identities. Recognizing the diverse and evolving nature of FDY's coping mechanisms, this study advocates for a culturally appropriate approach to resilience that integrates an intersectionality framework of individual attributes and culturally sensitive models.
全球冲突、暴力和侵犯人权事件的升级，为研究加拿大被迫流离失所青年（FDY）的适应力提供了紧迫的背景。本研究旨在剖析 FDY 面临的多方面挑战和适应机制，重点关注他们的健康、福祉和融入收容社区的情况。本研究旨在确定当前的适应力模式，了解每个模式中的因素，并强调差距和局限性。 本探索性快速综述使用大学图书馆员支持的结构化搜索策略，从 Ovid Medline 和开源数据库中搜索了 2019 年 1 月至 2024 年 1 月期间以英文发表的、符合特定纳入标准的文献。两名学生研究员与首席研究员（PI）一起对符合条件的文章（4096 篇中选出 12 篇）进行了图表和分析。图表数据进行了主题分析。 所选研究从不同的地理角度、适应力模型（如 Ungar 的生态视角和 Masten 的适应力发展模型）以及保护和促进框架捕捉了多样性。主要发现表明，个体、家庭、社会和文化因素影响了适应力的复杂性。每个模型都深入了解了这些因素对 FDY 适应力的动态相互作用。然而，这些模型往往无法解决文化特异性、创伤影响以及 FDY 身份的交叉性等细微差别。 鉴于 FDY 应对机制的多样性和演变性质，本研究提倡采取一种文化上适当的适应力方法，该方法整合了个体属性的交叉性框架和文化敏感的模型。
