Palamim Camila Vantini Capasso, Camargo Tais Mendes, Valencise Felipe Eduardo, Marson Fernando Augusto Lima
Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Laboratory of Clinical and Molecular Microbiology, LunGuardian Research Group - Epidemiology of Respiratory and Infectious Diseases, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 15;3(1):e000724. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000724. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, in Brazil, there has been a high rate of deaths, mainly among those who were hospitalised due to the disease and those who needed intensive care units (ICUs) and mechanical ventilation support.
The study evaluated the hospitalised patients with COVID-19 as well as subgroups considering those hospitalised patients who needed ICU treatment and those who received invasive mechanical ventilation in an ICU. The risk of death was compared in these three groups with adjustments for gender, age, race and comorbidities. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify the main predictors of death. A hospitalised patient was considered COVID-19 positive if they had a positive real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or serological test, followed by a notification form completed by a health professional, usually a medical doctor. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the institution (Certificate of Presentation of Ethical Appreciation n° 67241323.0.0000.5514; Study Approval Technical Opinion n° 5.908.611).
The study evaluated 2 031 309 hospitalised individuals with COVID-19. The case fatality rate was 33.2% (673 527/2 031 309). The case fatality rate was even higher among those patients who required ICU (372 031/665 621; 55.9%) treatment with the need for invasive ventilation support (240 704/303 505; 79.3%). In the multivariable analysis, the male sex (OR=1.14; 95% CI=1.13-1.15), older age [61 to 72 years old (OR=2.43; 95% CI=2.41-2.46), 83 to 85 years old (OR=4.10; 95% CI=4.06-4.14) and+85 years (OR=6.98; 95% CI=6.88-7.07)], race [mixed individuals () (OR=1.33; 95% CI=1.32-1.34), Black people (OR=1.57; 95% CI=1.55-1.60) and Indigenous peoples (OR=1.82, 95% CI=1.69-1.97)] and the presence of comorbidities [mainly, hepatic disorder (OR=1.80; 95% CI=1.73-1.87), immunosuppressive disorder (OR=1.80; 95% CI=1.76-1.84) and kidney disorder (OR=1.67; 95% CI=1.64-1.70)] were associated with an increased chance of death, except asthma (OR=0.77; 95% CI=0.75-0.79). In addition, among all admitted patients with COVID-19, the need for an ICU (OR=2.08; 95% CI=2.06-2.13) and invasive ventilatory support (OR=14.86; 95% CI=14.66-15.05) had an impact on death as an outcome.
Although the number of daily deaths from the coronavirus dropped during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil, our retrospective analysis showed a higher case fatality rate in patients requiring ICU, mainly when using invasive ventilation, compared with the rest of the world.
自新冠疫情开始以来,巴西的死亡率一直很高,主要集中在因该疾病住院的患者以及那些需要重症监护病房(ICU)和机械通气支持的患者中。
该研究评估了新冠住院患者,以及考虑那些需要ICU治疗的住院患者和在ICU接受有创机械通气的患者亚组。在对性别、年龄、种族和合并症进行调整后,比较了这三组的死亡风险。进行了多变量分析以确定死亡的主要预测因素。如果住院患者的实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)或血清学检测呈阳性,随后由卫生专业人员(通常是医生)填写通知表格,则该患者被视为新冠阳性。该研究得到了机构伦理委员会的批准(伦理评估报告证书编号67241323.0.0000.5514;研究批准技术意见编号5.908.611)。
该研究评估了2031309名新冠住院患者。病死率为33.2%(673527/2031309)。在那些需要ICU治疗(372031/665621;55.9%)以及需要有创通气支持(240704/303505;79.3%)的患者中,病死率更高。在多变量分析中,男性(OR = 1.14;95%CI = 1.13 - 1.15)、年龄较大[61至72岁(OR = 2.43;95%CI = 2.41 - 2.46)、83至85岁(OR = 4.10;95%CI = 4.06 - 4.14)以及85岁以上(OR = 6.98;95%CI = 6.88 - 7.07)]、种族[混血个体()(OR = 1.33;95%CI = 1.32 - 1.34)、黑人(OR = 1.57;95%CI = 1.55 - 1.60)和原住民(OR = 1.82,95%CI = 1.69 - 1.97)]以及合并症的存在[主要是肝脏疾病(OR = 1.80;95%CI = 1.73 - 1.87)、免疫抑制疾病(OR = 1.80;95%CI = 1.76 - 1.84)和肾脏疾病(OR = 1.67;95%CI = 1.64 - 1.70)]与死亡几率增加相关,但哮喘除外(OR = 0.77;95%CI = 0.75 - 0.79)。此外,在所有新冠住院患者中,需要ICU(OR = 2.08;95%CI = 2.06 - 2.13)和有创通气支持(OR = 14.86;95%CI = 14.66 - 15.05)对死亡结局有影响。
尽管在巴西新冠疫情期间,冠状病毒每日死亡人数有所下降,但我们的回顾性分析显示,与世界其他地区相比,需要ICU的患者病死率更高,主要是在使用有创通气时。