Suppr超能文献

分析 Photo Finish 智能手机应用程序测量短跑时间的有效性和可靠性。

Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of the Photo Finish Smartphone App to Measure Sprint Time.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad San Jorge, Autov. A-23 km 299, 50830 Villanueva de Gállego, Spain.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;24(20):6719. doi: 10.3390/s24206719.

Abstract

In athletic training and research, the evaluation of sprint speed is widely used, and its accurate measurement is especially demanding. High-cost photocells are the gold-standard system for sprint time assessment, although low-cost smartphone applications can be a suitable option. This study assesses the validity and reliability of an application to measure sprint time compared to photocells. Five physically active subjects completed six sprints of 10 m and 20 m at maximal speed and a 5 m go and return sprint to evaluate the validity of the Photo Finish app (Version 2.30). To assess reliability, six trials of 5 m go and return sprints were measured by two smartphones. The validity results showed a mean bias of 0.012 s (95% CL: 0.000, 0.024) between the application and the photocells for the 10 m sprint, 0.007 s (95% CL: -0.007, 0.022) for the 20 m sprint and 0.005 s (95% CL: -0.005, 0.017) for the 5 m go and return test. The results also found R between both systems (R= 0.9863, 0.990 and 0.958) for each distance (10 m, 20 m and 5 m go and return, respectively). As for reliability, the application showed outstanding consistency between two smartphones operating simultaneously (ICC 0.999; R: 0.999). This study shows that the Photo Finish app is an accurate and reliable tool to measure sprint time with an error of 0.09 s.

摘要

在运动训练和研究中,短跑速度的评估被广泛应用,其精确测量尤其具有挑战性。尽管低成本的智能手机应用程序也可以是一个合适的选择,但高成本的光电管仍然是短跑时间评估的黄金标准系统。本研究评估了一种应用程序测量短跑时间的有效性和可靠性,与光电管相比。五名身体活跃的受试者以最大速度完成了六次 10 米和 20 米的短跑,以及五次 5 米的往返短跑,以评估 Photo Finish 应用程序(版本 2.30)的有效性。为了评估可靠性,使用两部智能手机测量了六次 5 米往返短跑。有效性结果显示,应用程序与光电管在 10 米短跑中的平均偏差为 0.012 秒(95%置信区间:0.000,0.024),在 20 米短跑中为 0.007 秒(95%置信区间:-0.007,0.022),在 5 米往返测试中为 0.005 秒(95%置信区间:-0.005,0.017)。结果还发现,两个系统之间的 R 值(R=0.9863、0.990 和 0.958)分别为每个距离(10 米、20 米和 5 米往返测试)。至于可靠性,应用程序在两部同时运行的智能手机之间表现出出色的一致性(ICC 0.999;R:0.999)。本研究表明,Photo Finish 应用程序是一种准确可靠的测量短跑时间的工具,误差为 0.09 秒。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5de9/11511534/4e09e26ce644/sensors-24-06719-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验