Xiong ZhiFeng
College of physical education and health, Geely University of China, 641423 Chengdu, China.
J Sports Sci Med. 2025 Sep 1;24(3):475-484. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2025.475. eCollection 2025 Sep.
The aim of this study was to examine how physiological, locomotor, and mechanical load parameters contribute to variations in aerobic, anaerobic, and neuromuscular adaptations in male soccer players. A 12-week cohort study was conducted involving 41 male under-17 soccer players (16.4 ± 0.5 years old). All training sessions and matches were monitored using heart rate (HR) monitors, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and a global positioning system (GPS). The following variables were recorded daily: training impulse (TRIMP), session-RPE, total distance, high speed running (14.0 to 19.9 km/h, HSR), and very high speed running (>20 km/h, VHSR), and the number of accelerations and decelerations. Physical fitness was assessed twice - at baseline and after the 12-week intervention. The assessments included aerobic capacity via the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test (YYIRT), anaerobic capacity via the mean sprint time at Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RSAmean), muscle power using the Countermovement Jump (CMJ), and sprint performance measured in a 30-meter sprint. Simple linear regressions showed that both accumulated session-RPE (R = 0.446, β = 0.668, p < 0.001) and accumulated TRIMP (R = 0.417, β = 0.646, p < 0.001) were significant positive predictors of YYIRT delta, although explain less than half of variance. A multiple regression analysis revealed that accumulated VHSR significantly predicted RSAmean delta, indicating that higher VHSR values are associated with smaller and improved RSAmean (B = -0.003, p = 0.002), while HSR was not a significant predictor (p = 0.291). These findings suggest that internal load measures (session-RPE, TRIMP) are more strongly associated with aerobic adaptations, while specific external load metrics (e.g., VHSR) better explain RSA changes, highlighting the importance of modifying load monitoring strategies to the specific physiological adaptations targeted. Incorporating individualized load management based on these measures may help maximize performance improvements in practical contexts.
本研究的目的是探讨生理、运动和机械负荷参数如何影响男性足球运动员的有氧、无氧和神经肌肉适应性变化。进行了一项为期12周的队列研究,涉及41名17岁以下男性足球运动员(16.4±0.5岁)。所有训练课程和比赛均使用心率(HR)监测器、主观用力程度(RPE)评分和全球定位系统(GPS)进行监测。每天记录以下变量:训练冲量(TRIMP)、单次训练RPE、总距离、高速奔跑(14.0至19.9公里/小时,HSR)、极高速奔跑(>20公里/小时,VHSR)以及加速和减速次数。在基线和12周干预后对身体素质进行了两次评估。评估包括通过Yo-Yo间歇恢复测试(YYIRT)评估有氧能力、通过基于跑步的无氧冲刺测试(RSAmean)的平均冲刺时间评估无氧能力、使用反向移动跳跃(CMJ)评估肌肉力量以及在30米冲刺中测量冲刺表现。简单线性回归表明,累积单次训练RPE(R = 0.446,β = 0.668,p < 0.001)和累积TRIMP(R = 0.417,β = 0.646,p < 0.001)均是YYIRT变化量的显著正预测因子,尽管解释的方差不到一半。多元回归分析显示,累积VHSR显著预测RSAmean变化量,表明较高的VHSR值与较小且改善的RSAmean相关(B = -0.003,p = 0.002),而HSR不是显著预测因子(p = 0.291)。这些发现表明,内部负荷指标(单次训练RPE、TRIMP)与有氧适应性的关联更强,而特定的外部负荷指标(如VHSR)能更好地解释RSA的变化,突出了根据目标特定生理适应性调整负荷监测策略的重要性。基于这些指标纳入个性化负荷管理可能有助于在实际环境中最大限度地提高运动表现。