Department of Cardiology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Anzhen Hospital, No.2 of Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, 100029, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Department of Cardiology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04273-4.
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel physiological pacing method for treating left ventricular dyssynchrony. LBBAP is often delivered using lumenless leads (LLL). However, recent studies have also reported the use of style-driven leads (SDL). This study is the first systematic review comparing the outcomes of LBBAP with SDL vs. LLL.
The review and meta-analysis included all available comparative studies published on Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and Scopus up to 6th March 2024.
Eight observational studies were included in the review. Meta-analysis showed that success rates of LBBAP performed with LLL and SDL were comparable (OR: 1.72 95% CI: 0.94, 3.17 I = 38%). Duration of implantation and total procedural duration were significantly lower in LBBAP performed with SDL. The pacing threshold was significantly higher, while pacing impedance was significantly lower in the SDL compared to the LLL group. Pacing QRS interval, R-wave amplitude, and stimulus to peak left ventricular activation time were similar in the two groups. Intra-operative and post-operative dislodgement were significantly higher in the SDL group, but no difference was noted in intra-operative perforation and pneumothorax risk.
Limited evidence from observational studies with inherent selection bias shows that success rates for LBBAP may not differ between SDL and LLL. While implantation of SDL may be significantly faster, it carries a higher risk of lead dislodgement. Both SDL and LLL are associated with comparable pacing characteristics except for reduced pacing impedance with SDL.
左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)是一种治疗左心室不同步的新型生理性起搏方法。LBBAP 通常使用无内腔导联(LLL)进行传输。然而,最近的研究也报告了使用 StyIe-Driven 导联(SDL)的情况。本研究是首个比较 LBBAP 与 SDL 与 LLL 的系统评价。
本综述和荟萃分析纳入了截至 2024 年 3 月 6 日在 Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、CENTRAL 和 Scopus 上发表的所有可用的比较研究。
本综述纳入了 8 项观察性研究。荟萃分析显示,使用 LLL 和 SDL 进行 LBBAP 的成功率相当(OR:1.72,95%CI:0.94,3.17,I=38%)。使用 SDL 进行 LBBAP 的植入时间和总手术时间明显更短。与 LLL 组相比,SDL 组的起搏阈值明显更高,而起搏阻抗明显更低。两组的起搏 QRS 间期、R 波振幅和刺激到左心室激活时间相似。SDL 组术中及术后脱位的发生率明显较高,但术中穿孔和气胸的风险无差异。
受固有选择偏倚影响的观察性研究证据有限,表明 LBBAP 的成功率在 SDL 和 LLL 之间可能没有差异。虽然 SDL 的植入可能明显更快,但它存在更高的导联脱位风险。除了 SDL 起搏阻抗降低外,SDL 和 LLL 都具有相似的起搏特征。