Physical Education Department, College of Education, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, Viana do Castelo, 4900-347, Portugal.
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04674-0.
Surf therapy is gaining popularity for improving mental health. However, there is limited research evidence to substantiate these claims. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to assess randomized or non-randomized studies analyzing the efficacy of surf therapy in improving symptoms of mental illness compared to non-exercising controls and/or alternative intervention, and to identify evidential gaps to inform future research.
PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines were followed. Eligibility criteria included participants of any age and sex, explicitly diagnosed with any mental health disorder, while exposed to surf therapy and compared to non-exercising controls and/or alternative interventions. The primary outcome consisted of changes in symptoms of mental illness scored from baseline to post-intervention. Any randomized or non-randomized trial design was considered. We searched Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases (December 7, 2023), without language or publication date restrictions and without filters. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2. A meta-analysis could not be conducted due to heterogeneity of the studies; therefore, a narrative synthesis of individual study results was performed.
Of 5,666 records, three randomized controlled studies were included in the review. Overall, the findings of the three studies suggest no robust consistent evidence of improvement in mental health symptoms when comparing surf therapy to wait-list control groups or other nature-based exercise interventions (hike therapy). Certainty of evidence should be considered very low, as it is based on three randomized controlled trials.
Although we believe that surf therapy provides an interesting approach, robust evidence is scarce. Routes for future well-designed, controlled studies are discussed.
No funding to report.
PROSPERO CRD42021277060.
冲浪疗法在改善心理健康方面越来越受欢迎。然而,目前还没有足够的研究证据来证实这些说法。因此,本系统评价旨在评估分析冲浪疗法与非运动对照组和/或替代干预相比,改善精神疾病症状的疗效的随机或非随机研究,并确定证据空白,以指导未来的研究。
本研究遵循 PRISMA 2020 报告指南。纳入标准包括任何年龄和性别的参与者,明确诊断为任何精神疾病,同时接受冲浪疗法,并与非运动对照组和/或替代干预进行比较。主要结局为从基线到干预后精神疾病症状评分的变化。任何随机或非随机试验设计都被考虑。我们检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL、EMBASE、PubMed、Scopus、SPORTDiscus 和 Web of Science 数据库(2023 年 12 月 7 日),没有语言或出版日期限制,也没有使用过滤器。使用 RoB 2 评估偏倚风险。由于研究的异质性,无法进行荟萃分析;因此,对单个研究结果进行了叙述性综合。
在 5666 条记录中,有三项随机对照研究纳入本综述。总的来说,这三项研究的结果表明,与等待对照组或其他基于自然的运动干预(徒步疗法)相比,冲浪疗法对改善心理健康症状没有可靠的一致证据。由于三项随机对照试验,证据的确定性应被认为非常低。
尽管我们认为冲浪疗法提供了一种有趣的方法,但缺乏强有力的证据。讨论了未来进行精心设计、对照研究的途径。
无资金报告。
PROSPERO CRD42021277060。