Service de Médecine Interne Générale, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024 Oct 3;154:3714. doi: 10.57187/s.3714.
Health equity is a key component of quality of care and an objective for a growing number of quality improvement projects for deontological, ethical, public health and economic reasons. To monitor equity in the delivery of health services in Switzerland, there is a need to implement valid, measurable and actionable equity indicators, along with vulnerability stratifiers such as migrant status, which could lead to differences in quality of care. The aim of this study was to develop a set of healthcare equity indicators and stratifiers targeting inpatient and outpatient populations and to test their feasibility.
A scoping literature review and inputs from a national interprofessional expert taskforce provided a set of indicators and vulnerability stratifiers. The most valid and measurable indicators and stratifiers were retained using a Delphi process. They were then operationalised, and their implementation tested in three Swiss hospitals from the three language regions.
A taskforce of 18 experts, including a patient representative, selected 11 indicators that evaluate structures, processes and outcomes, and five vulnerability stratifiers. Although most indicators and stratifiers could be implemented in all three hospitals, data availability was limited for some variables, including patient satisfaction and access to interpreters for foreign-language patients.
The equity indicators and stratifiers identified by this two-stage process have content validity, wide patient coverage and are focused on inequities in the healthcare system that are actionable through improvement projects. Both the indicators and the project methodology could be replicated in institutions aiming for more equitable care.
出于道德、伦理、公共卫生和经济等方面的原因,卫生公平是医疗质量的关键组成部分,也是越来越多质量改进项目的目标。为了监测瑞士卫生服务提供方面的公平性,需要制定有效的、可衡量的和可操作的公平指标,以及弱势群体分层指标,如移民身份,这可能导致医疗质量的差异。本研究的目的是制定一套针对住院和门诊人群的医疗保健公平指标和弱势群体分层指标,并测试其可行性。
通过文献范围界定审查和国家跨专业专家工作组的投入,提供了一套指标和弱势群体分层指标。使用德尔菲法保留了最有效和可衡量的指标和分层指标。然后对其进行了实施,并在来自三个语言区的三家瑞士医院中测试了其实施情况。
一个由 18 名专家组成的工作组,包括一名患者代表,选择了 11 个评估结构、过程和结果的指标,以及 5 个弱势群体分层指标。尽管大多数指标和分层指标都可以在所有三所医院实施,但有些变量的数据可用性有限,包括患者满意度和为讲外语的患者提供口译员。
通过这两阶段过程确定的公平指标和分层指标具有内容有效性、广泛的患者覆盖面,并侧重于可通过改进项目解决的医疗保健系统中的不公平问题。该指标和项目方法都可以在希望提供更公平的医疗保健的机构中复制。