Suppr超能文献

全国范围内非紧急医疗保健禁令期间的程序优先级:瑞士医院数据的准实验性回顾性研究

Procedure Prioritization During a Nationwide Ban on Non-Urgent Healthcare: A Quasi-Experimental Retrospective Study of Hospital Data in Switzerland.

作者信息

Grischott Thomas, Mehra Tarun, Meyer Matthias R, Senn Oliver, Rachamin Yael

机构信息

Institute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Health Serv Insights. 2024 Oct 23;17:11786329241293534. doi: 10.1177/11786329241293534. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 lockdown in spring 2020, Switzerland restricted non-urgent healthcare services to safeguard capacity. While prioritization of care was supposed to be driven by medical urgency, demographic factors or economic incentives might have influenced the hospitals' resource allocation decisions.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates potential determinants of procedure prioritization in hospitalized patients during the lockdown period.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental retrospective study of hospital data in Switzerland.

METHODS

We analyzed 496 456 adult patients with known insurance status and a recorded procedure, admitted for cardiovascular, orthopedic/musculoskeletal or oncological reasons from January 2017 (3 years before the COVID-19 outbreak) to mid-April 2020 (in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic), to obtain admission rate ratios (ARRs, "lockdown" admission rates divided by "normal" rates) from negative binomial regression analysis of fortnightly admissions for frequent procedure-diagnosis combinations. Quade and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared ARRs between sex×age, insurance and comorbidity strata.

RESULTS

Admission rates showed significant reductions for 29 of 53 procedure-diagnosis combinations. Reductions varied strongly by emergency, with largest decreases in orthopedic procedures for arthrosis (osteoarthritis) and non-arthritic joint disorders, and the smallest in cerebral imaging for stroke patients and surgical procedures for malignant neoplasms. The only difference in ARRs between strata was a stronger decrease in admission rates for cardiovascular combinations for patients with private versus basic health insurance.

CONCLUSION

While medical procedures were affected to varying degrees by the ban on non-urgent healthcare during the COVID-19 lockdown, we found no robust evidence that factors other than medical urgency influenced healthcare prioritization.

摘要

背景

在2020年春季新冠疫情封锁期间,瑞士限制了非紧急医疗服务以保障医疗能力。虽然医疗护理的优先级本应依据医疗紧急程度来确定,但人口因素或经济激励措施可能影响了医院的资源分配决策。

目的

本研究调查了封锁期间住院患者手术优先级的潜在决定因素。

设计

对瑞士医院数据进行的准实验性回顾性研究。

方法

我们分析了496456名已知保险状况且有记录手术的成年患者,这些患者因心血管、骨科/肌肉骨骼或肿瘤原因于2017年1月(新冠疫情爆发前3年)至2020年4月中旬(新冠疫情大流行的第一年)入院,通过对频繁手术-诊断组合的双周入院情况进行负二项回归分析来获取入院率比(ARR,“封锁”期入院率除以“正常”期入院率)。Quade检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较了性别×年龄、保险和合并症分层之间的ARR。

结果

53种手术-诊断组合中有29种的入院率显著下降。下降幅度因紧急程度差异很大,骨关节炎和非关节炎性关节疾病的骨科手术下降幅度最大,中风患者的脑部成像和恶性肿瘤的外科手术下降幅度最小。各分层之间ARR的唯一差异是,拥有私人医疗保险与基本医疗保险的患者,心血管疾病组合的入院率下降幅度更大。

结论

虽然在新冠疫情封锁期间,非紧急医疗服务禁令对医疗程序产生了不同程度的影响,但我们没有找到有力证据表明除医疗紧急程度外的其他因素影响了医疗护理的优先级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6e3/11503697/1452a23b9d0b/10.1177_11786329241293534-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验